Quentin Skinner and Jacques Derrida on Power and the State

4Citations
Citations of this article
27Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

This article compares and contrasts the work of Quentin Skinner and Jacques Derrida on power and the State. It argues that despite Skinner's explicit repudiation of Derrida's method of philosophising, he has come to advocate an approach to the history of ideas that bears important and striking similarities to Derrida's thought. I attribute this intellectual gravitation toward Derrida as the logical outcome of a shared understanding on the nature of the cosmos and man's place within it-an understanding profoundly indebted to the philosophy of Friedrich Nietzsche and the genealogical history of Michel Foucault. As a means to illustrate the narrowing intellectual gulf between Skinner and Derrida, I compare their respective thoughts on the nature of the modern and contemporary State, a State that both intellectuals see as emerging from a dominant western philosophical tradition that, at its core, is marked by the idea of fear. For both Skinner and Derrida this has profound consequences for the possibilities open to individuals and societies for free thought and political action. © 2007 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Drolet, M. (2007). Quentin Skinner and Jacques Derrida on Power and the State. History of European Ideas, 33(2), 234–255. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.histeuroideas.2006.11.003

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free