Abstract
Although this paper does not directly reference work done by Ed Gettier, I feel that it is an appropriate contribution to this volume in that it deals with two of the great intellectual loves of Ed’s life, higher-order logic and modal logic, and it deals with them in a ‘logic-chopping’ way that I rightly or wrongly think would please Ed.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Bibliography
Anderson, A.R. and N. Belnap, Jr. et al. [1975], Entailment: The Logic of Relevance and Necessity (Princeton: Princeton University Press).
Cummins, R. and Gottlieb, D. [1972], ‘On an Argument for Truth-Functionality,’ American Philosophical Quarterly, 9 265–269.
Davidson, D. [1967], ‘Causal Relations,’ Journal of Philosophy, 64 691–703.
Davidson, D. [1975], ‘True to the Facts,’ Journal of Philosophy, 66 748–764.
Dunn, J.M. [1981], ‘Quantum mathematics’ in PSA 1980, vol. 2, eds., P. Asquith and R. Giere (Lansing, Michigan: The Philosophy of Science Association) 512–531.
Frege, G. [1892], ‘On Sense and Reference,’ Zeitschrift für Philosophie und philosophische Kritik, 100, reprinted and translated by P. Geach and M. Black [1960], Translations from the Philosophical Writings of Gottlob Frege (Oxford, England: Basil Blackwell) 56–78.
Gödel, K. [1946], ‘Russell’s Mathematical Logic,’ in The Philosophy of Bertrand Russell, ed. P. A. Schilpp (Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press) 125–153.
Goldblatt, R. H. [1974], ‘Semantic Analysis of Orthologic,’ Journal of Philosophical Logic, 19–35.
Haack, S. [1974], Deviant Logic: Some Philosophical Issues (Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press).
Hellman, G. [1981], ‘Quantum Logic and Meaning,’ in PSA 1980, vol. 2, eds. P. Asquith and R. Giere (Lansing, Michigan: The Philosophy of Science Association) 493–511.
Los, J. and R. Suszko [1958], ‘Remarks on Sentential Logics,’ Indagationes Mathematicae, 20 177–183.
Putnam, H. [1968], ‘Is Logic Empirical?’ in Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science 5, eds. R. Cohen and M. Wartowsky, (Dordrecht, Holland: D. Reidel) 216–241.
Quine, W. V. O. [1960], Word and Object (Cambridge, Massachusetts: M.I.T. Press).
Quine, W. V. O. [1961], ‘Reference and Modality,’ From a Logical Point of View (Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press) 139–159.
Quine, W. V. O. [1966], ‘Three Grades of Modal Involvement,’ The Ways of Paradox, (New York: Random House) 156–174.
Sharvy, R. [1972], ‘Three Types of Referential Opacity,’ Philosophy of Science, 39 153–161.
Takeuti, G. [198+], ‘Quantum Set Theory,’ manuscript.
Wallace, J. [1969], ‘Propositional Attitudes and Identity,’ Journal of Philosophy, 66, 145–152.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1988 Kluwer Academic Publishers
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Dunn, J.M. (1988). The Impossibility of Certain Higher-Order Non-Classical Logics with Extensionality. In: Austin, D.F. (eds) Philosophical Analysis. Philosophical Studies Series, vol 39. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-2909-8_16
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-2909-8_16
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-3150-2
Online ISBN: 978-94-009-2909-8
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive