skip to main content
article

Virtual worlds and moral evaluation

Authors Info & Claims
Published:01 December 2012Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

Consider the multi-user virtual worlds of online games such as EVE and World of Warcraft, or the multi-user virtual world of Second Life. Suppose a player performs an action in one of these worlds, via his or her virtual character, which would be wrong, if the virtual world were real. What is the moral status of this virtual action? In this paper I consider arguments for and against the Asymmetry Thesis: the thesis that such virtual actions are never wrong. I also explain how the truth of the Asymmetry Thesis is closely aligned with the possibility of what Edward Castronova has called closed synthetic worlds. With some qualifications, the ultimate conclusion is that the Asymmetry Thesis is false and that these closed worlds are impossible.

References

  1. Athanassoulis, N. (2002). The role of consent in sadomasochistic practices. Research Publications, 8, 141-155.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Bachman, R. (1983). The running man. New York: Signet Books.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Bradley, C., & Froomkin, A. (2004). Virtual worlds, real rules. New York Law School Law Review, 49, 103-146.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Brandt, R. B. (1979). A theory of the good and the right. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Brey, P. (1999). The ethics of representation and action in virtual reality. Ethics and Information Technology, 1, 5-14. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Castronova, E. (2004). The right to play. New York Law School Law Review, 49, 185-210.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Castronova, E. (2005, December 24). The Horde is Evil. Terra Nova {Weblog}. http://terranova.blogs.com/terra_nova/2005/12/the_ horde_is_ev.html. from Retrieved 4 June 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Community Standards. (n.d.). Second Life. http://secondlife.com/ corporate/cs.php. Retrieved from 18 June 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Craft, A. (2007). Sin in cyber-eden: Understanding the metaphysics and morals of virtual worlds. Ethics and Information Technology, 9, 205-217. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Driver, J. (2007). Dream immorality. Philosophy, 82, 5-22.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. EVE Online {computer software}. (2003). CCP.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Fairfield, J. (2005). Virtual property. Boston University Law Review, 85, 1047-1102.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Francis, T. (2005). Murder incorporated (pp. 126-129). UK: PC Gamer.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Gooskens, G. (2010). The ethical status of virtual actions. Ethical Perspectives, 17, 59-78.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Hooker, B. (2000). Ideal code, real world: A rule-consequentialist theory of morality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Huizinga, J. (1955). Homo ludens: A study of the play-elements in culture. Boston: Beacon Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Hunter, D., & Lastowka, G. (2004). Virtual crimes. New York Law School Law Review, 49, 211-229.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Hurd, H. (1996). The moral magic of consent. Legal Theory, 2, 121-146.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Johansson, M. (2009). Why unreal punishments in response to unreal crimes might actually be a really good thing. Ethics and Information Technology, 11, 71-79. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Kant, I. (1996) The Metaphysics of Morals, Mary Gregor (trans.) Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Kerr, O. (2008). Criminal law in virtual worlds. University of Chicago Legal Forum, 415.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Lamorisse, A. (1957). Risk {board game}, Parker Brothers.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Lander, M. (2003, December 26). Kassel Journal; Eating people is wrong! But is it homicide? Court to rule. New York Times. http://www.nytimes.com/2003/12/26/world/kassel-journal-eating-people-is-wrong-but-is-it-homicide-court-to-rule.html. from Retrieved 8 Dec 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Munn, N. J. (2012). The reality of friendship within immersive virtual worlds. Ethics and Information Technology, 14, 1-10. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Nielsen, M. E. J. (2010). Safe, sane, and consensual--consent and the ethics of BDSM. International Journal of Applied Philosophy, 24, 265-288.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. Nolan, C. (2010). Inception. Studios: Warner Bros.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Orend, B. (2006). The morality of war. Peterborough: Broadview Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Powers, T. (2003). Real wrongs in virtual communities. Ethics and Information Technology, 5, 191-198. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  29. Rossignol, J. (2005). A deadly dollar. The Escapist, 19, 18-22.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Second Life {computer software}. (2003). Linden Lab.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Strikwerda, L. (2012). Theft of virtual items in online multiplayer computer games: an ontological and moral analysis. Ethics and Information Technology, 14, 89-97. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. Walzer, M. (2006). Just and unjust wars: A moral argument with historical illustrations. New York: Basic Books.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Warburton, S. (2009). Second Life in higher education: Assessing the potential for and the barriers to deploying virtual worlds in learning and teaching. British Journal of Educational Technology, 40, 414-426.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. Wertheimer, A. (2000). What is consent? And is it important? Buffalo Criminal Law Review, 3, 557-583.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  35. Wolfendale, J. (2007). My avatar, my self: Virtual harm and attachment. Ethics and Information Technology, 9, 111-119. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. World of Warcraft {computer software}. (2004). Blizzard/Vivendi.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Virtual worlds and moral evaluation
        Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in

        Full Access