Skip to main content
Log in

Teaching ethical analysis in environmental management decisions: A process-oriented approach

  • Published:
Science and Engineering Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The general public and environmental policy makers often perceive management actions of environmental managers as “science,” when such actions are, in fact, value judgments about when to intervene in natural processes. The choice of action requires ethical as well as scientific analysis because managers must choose a normative outcome to direct their intervention. I examine a management case study involving prescribed burning of sagebrush (Artemisia tridentata) communities in south-central Montana (USA) to illustrate how to teach students to ethically evaluate a management action by precisely identifying: 1) the proposed management action, 2) the deficiency of the system to be remedied by the action, 3) the stakeholders affected by the action, and 4) the category and type of values affirmed in the management action. Through such analysis, students are taught to recognize implicit and explicit value judgments associated with management actions, identify stakeholders to whom managers have legitimate ethical obligations, and practice a general method of ethical analysis applicable to many forms of environmental management.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bunnell, F.L., and Dupuis, L.A. (1995) Conservation Biology’s literature revisited: wine or vinaigrette? Wildlife Society Bulletin 23: 56–62.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Murphy, D.D. (1990) Conservation biology and the scientific method, Conservation Biology 4: 203–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Tarlock, A.D. (1994) The nonequilibrium paradigm in ecology and the partial unraveling of environmental law, Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review 27: 1121–1144.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Dworkin, R. (1977) Taking rights seriously, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Elliot, J. (1978) Lessons from Love Canal, Journal of the American Medical Association 240: 2033–2034, 2040.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Davidson, A. (1990) In the Wake of the Exxon Valdez: The Devastating Impact of the Alaska Oil Spill, Sierra Club Books, San Francisco, California.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Porter, W.F. and Underwood, H.B. (1999) Of elephants and blind men: deer management in the U.S. national parks, Ecological Applications 9: 3–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Daly, H.E. (1968) On economics as a life science, Journal of Political Economy 76: 392–406.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Van Dyke, F.G., DiBenedetto, J.P. and Thomas, S.C. (1991) Vegetation and elk response to prescribed burning in south-central Montana, pp. 163–179; in Keiter, R.B. and Boyce, M.S. (eds.) The Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem: Redefining America’s Wilderness Heritage, Yale University Press, New Haven, Connecticut.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Van Dyke, F., Klein, W.C. and Stewart, S.T. (1998) Long-term range fidelity in Rocky Mountain elk, The Journal of Wildlife Management 61: 1020–1036.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Ralston H. III, (1986) Philosophy Gone Wild: Essays in Environmental Ethics, Prometheus Books, Buffalo, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Nash, R. (1989) The Rights of Nature: A History of Environmental Ethics, University of Wisconsin Press, Madison, Wisconsin.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Davis, M. (1986) The moral status of dogs, forests, and other persons, Social Theory and Practice 12: 27–59

    Google Scholar 

  14. Petulla, J.M. (1988) American Environmental History, 2nd edition, Macmillan, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Leopold, A. (1974) A Sand County Almanac: With Essays on Conservation from Round River, Sierra Club/Ballantine, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Van Dyke, F., Mahan, D.C., Sheldon, J.K. and Brand, R.H. (1996) Redeeming Creation: The Biblical Basis for Environmental Stewardship, Inter Varsity Press, Downers Grove, Illinois.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Robinson, J.B. (1992) Of maps and territories: the use and abuse of socio-economic modeling in support of decision-making, Technological Forecasting and Social Change 42: 147–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fred Van Dyke.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Van Dyke, F. Teaching ethical analysis in environmental management decisions: A process-oriented approach. SCI ENG ETHICS 11, 659–669 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-005-0034-z

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-005-0034-z

Keywords

Navigation