Skip to main content
Log in

Building Ethical Leaders: A Way to Integrate and Assess Ethics Education

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The Building Ethical Leaders using an Integrated Ethics Framework (BELIEF) Program was introduced in 2006 at the Northern Illinois University College of Business. The Program was developed to support two learning objectives: (1) increase students’ awareness of ethical issues and (2) strengthen their decision-making abilities regarding these ethical issues. This article provides an overview of the development and integration of this Program. We also provide assessment data on our two learning objectives. The assessment measures improvement from 2005, before the implementation of the program, to all of the post-year measures. Thus, the BELIEF Program appears to enhance our students’ ability to recognize issues and identify appropriate decision alternatives. We hope that the description of the components of BELIEF will aid other schools as they integrate ethics into their curriculum.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Exhibit 3
Exhibit 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The handbook was written by NIU faculty and is specifically tailored to the BELIEF Program framework. The handbook is integrated into a required junior-level course. Students must successfully complete an online quiz regarding the content of the handbook before registering for subsequent semesters. Students are admitted to the College of Business when they are juniors. All take the same required course their first semester.

  2. The guide was developed based on several resources in the ethical decision-making literature (Davis 2003; Jennings 1998; Johannesen 2002; Nash 1993; Paton 1947; Peale and Blanchard 1988).

  3. All students are provided a wallet-sized card resembling a credit card that contains the 7-steps and the 12 tests that are part of the BELIEF decision-making guide.

  4. Currently the COB provides approximately 40 % and corporate partners and sponsors provide the remaining 60 % of the funding for the operations of the BELIEF Program. The goal is for BELIEF to be 100 % self-funded in the near future.

  5. During ethics week in 2011, more than 20 different speakers delivered presentations in over 30 different classes addressing over 1,000 students.

  6. Current corporate partners include AT&T Mobility, Caterpillar, Experian, KPMG, Microsoft, The National Bank & Trust, NICOR, and Road Ranger.

  7. The general academic scenario and the six scenarios for each major were developed by faculty in that discipline and pilot tested using a sample of COB students. Student responses were reviewed to determine if anything in the scenario was unclear or confusing. Minor modifications were made to the scenarios after the pilot test.

  8. The ten variables are the five questions for two scenarios (academic and discipline).

  9. The COB assurance of learning goal for ethics is that at least 80 % of the students meet or exceed expectations.

References

  • AACSB International. (2004). Ethics Education in Business Schools: Report of the Ethics Education Task Force to AACSB International’s Board of Directors. Downloaded from AACSB website on June 14, 2007.

  • AACSB International. (2007). Eligibility Procedures and Accreditation Standards for Business Accreditation.

  • Bloom, B. S. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives, Handbook 1: The cognitive domain. New York: David McKay Co Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cagle, J. A.B., P. W. Glasgo, and V. M. Holmes: 2008, ‘Using ethics vignettes in introductory finance classes: Impact on ethical perceptions of undergraduate business students’, Journal of Education for Business (November/December), 76-83.

  • Davis, M. (2003). A format for ethical decision making. Chicago, IL: Center for Study of Ethics in the Professions at the Illinois Institute of Technology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dean, K. L., & Beggs, J. M. (2006). University professors and teaching ethics: Conceptualizations and expectations. Journal of Management Education, 30, 15–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dellaportas, S., Cooper, B. J., & Leung, P. (2006). Measuring moral judgment and the implications of cooperative education and rule-based learning. Accounting and Finance, 46, 53–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gautschi, F. H., I. I. I., & Jones, T. M. (1998). Enhancing the ability of business students to recognize ethical issues: An empirical assessment of the effectiveness of a course in business ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 17, 205–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jennings, M. (1998). Ethics: Why it matters & how you do it. Government Accountants Journal, 47(4), 12–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johannesen, R. (2002). Ethics in human communications (5th ed.). Prospect Heights, IL: Waveland Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ketcham, A. F. (2003). Variations on the ethics component of the AACSB Accreditation Process. Journal of the Academy of Business Education. https://abe.villanova.edu/proc2003/ketcham.pdf

  • Kohlberg, L. (1969). Stage and sequence. The cognitive developmental approach to socialization. In D. A. Goslin (Ed.), Handbook of socialization theory (pp. 347–480). Chicago, IL: Rand McNally.

    Google Scholar 

  • Landis, J. R., & Koch, G. G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33(1), 159–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McNair, F., & Milam, E. E. (1993). Ethics in accounting education: What is really being done. Journal of Business Ethics, 12, 797–809.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nash, L. (1993). Good intentions aside: A manager’s guide to resolving ethical problems. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nguyen, N. T., Basuray, T. M., Smith, W. P., Kopka, D., & McCulloh, D. N. (2008). Ethics perception: Does teaching make a difference? Journal of Education for Business, 84, 66–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paton, H. (1947). The categorical imperative: A study of Kant’s philosophy. London: Hutchinson’s University Library.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peale, N., & Blanchard, K. (1988). The power of ethical management. New York: William Morrow & Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rest, J. R. (1986). Moral development: Advances in research and theory. New York: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richards, C. (1999). The transient effects of limited ethics training. Journal of Education for Business, 74, 332–334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ritter, B. A. (2006). Can business ethics be taught? A study of the ethical decision-making process in business students. Journal of Business Ethics, 68, 153–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sims, R. R., & Felton, E. I., Jr. (2006). Designing and delivering business ethics teaching and learning. Journal of Business Ethics, 63, 297–312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steiner, G., & Steiner, J. (2006). Business, government and society: A managerial perspective (11th ed.). Boston: McGraw-Hill, Irwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Towell, E., K. McFadden, W. McCoy, & A. Buhrow. (2012). Creating an Interdisciplinary Business Ethics Program. Journal of Academic Ethics, 10(12), 93–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, J. (1990). Managers’ moral reasoning: Assessing their responses to three moral dilemmas. Human Relations, 43, 687–702.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, S. C., & Dewett, T. (2005). Yes, you can teach business ethics: A review and research agenda. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 12, 109–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pamela A. Smith.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dzuranin, A.C., Shortridge, R.T. & Smith, P.A. Building Ethical Leaders: A Way to Integrate and Assess Ethics Education. J Bus Ethics 115, 101–114 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1371-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1371-x

Keywords

Navigation