Skip to main content
Log in

Would Introductory Chemistry Courses Work Better with a New Philosophical Basis?

  • Published:
Foundations of Chemistry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

One of the main functions that introductory chemistry courses havefulfilled during the past century has been to provide evidence for the generalvalidity of 'the atomic hypothesis.' A second function has been to demonstratethat an analytical approach has wide applicability in rationalizing many kindsof phenomena. Following R.G. Collingwood, these two functions can be recognizedas related to a philosophical 'cosmology' (worldview, weltanshauung) thatbecame dominant in the late Renaissance. Recent developments in many areasof science, and in chemistry, have emphasized the central importance of understandingsynthetic, developmental, and evolutionary aspects of nature. This paperargues that these scientific developments, and changes in other aspects of culture,amount to a widespread shift to an alternative cosmology, a quite different generalworldview. To the extent that this is the case, introductory chemistry coursesought to be changed in fundamental ways. Rather than having a main focus onanalysis to microscopic components, introductory chemistry instruction shouldemphasize current scientific understanding of the (synthetic) evolutionary originsof the present world. This altered approach would provide good preparation forfuture professional work, while also making better contact with the perceivedconcerns of students.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • N. Abrams and J. Primack, Cosmology and 21st-Century Culture. Science93: 1769–1770, (September 7) 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  • T. Aquinas, Summa Contra Gentiles, Book II, Q. 45 ff., ca. 1264. http://www. nd.edu/Departments/Maritain/etext/gc2_45.htm

  • T. Barringer and E. Prettejohn (Eds), Frederic Leighton: Antiquity, Renaissance, Modernity. Yale University Press, New Haven, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Bartlett. Familiar Quotations, 15th edn. Little, Brown, NY, 1980.

  • B. Bensaude-Vincent and I. Stengers, D. van Dam (trans.), A History of Chemistry. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  • R. Breslow, Not So General Chemistry. Chemical and Engineering News,July 30, 2001, p. 5. http://pubs.acs.org/isubscribe/journals/cen/79/i31/html/7931edit. Html.

  • T.L. Brown, Making Truth: Metaphor in Science. University of Illinois Press, Urbana, IL, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  • A. Carnegie, James Watt. Doubleday, Page & Co., New York, NY, 1905. http://www.history.rochester.edu/steam/carnegie/ch5.html

    Google Scholar 

  • E. Cassirer, The Individual and the Cosmos in Renaissance Philosophy.Barnes & Noble, New York, NY, 1964.

    Google Scholar 

  • E. Chaisson, Cosmic Evolution: The Rise of Complexity in Nature.Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  • R.G. Collingwood, The Idea of Nature. arendon Press, Oxford, 1945.

  • C.A. Coulson, Valence. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1952.

    Google Scholar 

  • H. Dehmelt, Experiments on the Structure of an Individual Elementary Particle. Science 247: 539, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  • G. Del Re, The Cosmic Dance: Science Discovers the Mysterious Harmony of the Universe. Templeton Foundation Press, Radnor, PA, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  • C. Dickens, The Adventures of Oliver Twist, or the Parish Boy's Progress. London, Bently, 1838, p. 51. Quoted in Bartlett, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Douglas, Natural Symbols; Explorations in Cosmology. Pantheon Books, New York, NY, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  • J.E. Earley (Ed.), Individuality and Cooperative Action. Georgetown University Press, Washington, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  • J.E. Earley, The Nature of Chemical Existence, in P. Bogaard and G. Treash (Eds), Metaphysics as Foundation. State University of New York Press, Albany, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  • J.E. Earley, An Introductory Chemistry Course Involving Nonlinear Dynamics. Journal of Chemical Education 70: 1016, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  • J.E. Earley, Naturalism, Theism, and the Origin of Life. Process Studies27 (3–4): 267–279, 1998a.

    Google Scholar 

  • J.E. Earley, Modes of Chemical Becoming. Hyle4 (2): 105–115, 1998b. http://www.hyle.org/journal/issues/4/earley.htm

    Google Scholar 

  • J.E. Earley, How Do Chemists Know When ‘Many’ Become ‘One’? Can Others Do it Too?, in N. Psarros and K. Gavroglu (Eds), Ars Mutandi: Issues in Philos-ophy and History of Chemistry. Leipzig University Press, Leipzig, pp. 75–81, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  • J.E. Earley, Varieties of Chemical Closure, in J. Chandler and G. Van de Vijer (Eds), Closure: Emergent Organizations and Their Dynamics, Volume 901. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, pp. 122–131, 2000.

  • J.E. Earley, Constraints on the Origin of Coherence in Far-from-equilibrium Chemical Systems, in T.E. Eastman and H. Keeton (Eds), Physics and White-head: Quantum, Process and Experience. State University of New York Press, Albany, pp. 63–73, 2003a.

    Google Scholar 

  • J.E. Earley, How Dynamic Aggregates May Achieve Effective Integration. Advances in Complex Systems 6(1): 115–126, 2003b.

    Google Scholar 

  • J.E. Earley (Ed), Chemical Explanation: Characteristics, Development, Autonomy. Annals of the New York Academy of Science: 988, 2003c.

  • J.E. Earley, On the Relevance of Repetition, Recurrence, and Reiteration, in D. Sobczynska, E. Zielonaka-Lis and P. Kreidler (Eds), Chemistry in the Philosophical Melting Pot. Peter Lang, Frankfurt, pp. 171–185, 2004a.

    Google Scholar 

  • J.E. Earley, Philosophical Implications of Chemical Symmetry, in D. Baird et al. (Eds), Philosophy of Chemistry: Synthesis of a New Discipline, Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science. Kluwer, Dordrecht, 2004b, in press.

    Google Scholar 

  • I. Epstein and J. Pojman, An Introduction to Nonlinear Chemical Dynamics: Oscillations, Waves, Patterns, and Chaos. Oxford University Press, New York, NY, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  • P. Erickson and C. Hulse (Eds), Early Modern Visual Culture: Representa-tion, Race, Empire in Renaissance England. University of Pennsylvania Press, Philadelphia, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  • A. Flexner, Medical Education in the United States and Canada: A Report to the Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching. Science & Health Publications, Washington, 1972, c1910.

    Google Scholar 

  • R.H. Frank, T.D. Gilovich and D.T. Regan, Do Economists Make Bad Citizens? Journal of Economic Perspectives 10(1): 187–192, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  • K. Gooding, Rio to Pursue Controversial Mine. Miningweb (Johannesburg), (January 7), 2002. http://allafrica.com/stories/200201080322.html

  • I. Hacking, Representing and Intervening. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1983. See especially Chapter 16, Experimenting and Scientific Realism.

    Google Scholar 

  • M.B. Hall, Robert Boyle on Natural Philosophy, an Essay, with Selections from His Writings. Indiana University Press, Bloomington, 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  • R. Harré, One Thousand Years of Philosophy: From R am anuja to Wittgenstein. Malden, Mass.: Blackwell, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  • D. Hockney, Secret Knowledge: Rediscovering the Lost Techniques of the Old Masters. Viking Studio, New York, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  • S. Kauffman, The Origins of Order: Self-Organization and Selection in Evolution. Oxford University Press, New York, NY, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  • S. Kauffman, At Home in the Universe: The Search for Laws of Self-Organization and Complexity. Oxford University Press, New York, NY, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  • S. Kauffman, Investigations. Oxford University Press. New York, NY, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  • E. Keinan and I. Schechter (Eds), Chemistry for the 21st Century. Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  • J.M. Keynes, The General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money. Macmillan, London, 1936.

    Google Scholar 

  • D. Kondepudi and I. Prigogine, Modern Thermodynamics: From Heat Engines to Dissipative Structures. John Wiley, New York, NY, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  • I. Leclerc, The Nature of Physical Existence. Humanities Press, New York, NY, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  • J.-M. Lehn, Some Reflections on Chemistry-Molecular, Supermolecular and Beyond, in Keinan, pp. 1–7, 2001.

  • G.W. Leibniz, Philosophical Papers and Letters; a Selection,L.E. Loemker (trans, and Ed.). University of Chicago Press, Chicago, p. 534, 1956; G.II, 263. Quoted in Leclerc, p. 255, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  • K.T. Lorenz et al., Direct Measurement of the Preferred Sense of NO Rotation after Collision with Argon. Science293: 2063–2070, 2001 (14 September).

    Google Scholar 

  • T. Lucretius (Carus), On the Nature of Things, a metrical translation by W.E. Leonard. Dutton, New York, NY, 1950. http://classics.mit.edu/Carus/nature_ things.1.i.html

    Google Scholar 

  • S.F. Mason, Chemical Evolution: Origins of the Elements, Molecules, and Living Systems. Oxford University Press, New York, NY, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  • E. McMullin (Ed.), TheConcept of Matter. The University of Notre Dame Press, South Bend, IN, 1963.

    Google Scholar 

  • G. Mirandola (Pico della), On the Dignity of Man, C.G. Wallis (trans.). Bobbs-Merrill, New York, NY, 1965. Also: http://www.santafe.edu/~shalizi/Mirandola/

    Google Scholar 

  • W.A. Noyes. Text Book of Chemistry, Revised Edition. Henry Holt and Co, New York, 1926.

    Google Scholar 

  • L. Pauling, The Nature of the Chemical Bond and the Structure of Molecules and Crystals; an Introduction to Modern Structural Chemistry. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY, 1939.

    Google Scholar 

  • L. Pauling, College Chemistry. Freeman, San Francisco, 1952.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plotinus, Plotinus: The Six Enneads, S. McKenna and B.S. Page (trans.). Encyclo-pedia Britannica Inc., Chicago, 1952.

    Google Scholar 

  • I. Prigogine and I. Stengers, The End of Certainty: Time, Chaos, and the New Laws of Nature. Free Press, New York, NY, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  • J.H. Randall. The Making of the Modern Mind; a Survey of the Intellectual Background of the Present Age. Houghton Mifflin, New York, NY, 1940.

    Google Scholar 

  • E. Redondi, Galileo, Heretic. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  • N. Rescher, Complexity: A Philosophical Overview. Transactions, New Brunswick, NJ, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  • N. Rescher, Process Philosophy: A Survey of Basic Issues. University of Pittsburgh Press, Pittsburgh, PA, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  • E.R. Scerri and L. McIntyre, The Case for the Philosophy of Chemistry. Synthese 111: 213–232, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  • M.J. Sienko and R.A. Plane, Chemistry. McGraw-Hill, New York, NY, 1961.

    Google Scholar 

  • P. Teilhard de Chardin, How I Believe, Rene Hague (trans.). Harper & Row, New York, NY, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  • H.A. Simon, A Mechanism for Social Selection and Successful Altruism. Science 250: 1116–1120, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  • G. Urton, The History of a Myth: Pacariqtambo and the Origin of the Inkas. University of Texas Press, Austin, TX, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  • R. Vihalemm, The Problem of the Unity of Science and Chemistry, in D. Sobczynska, E. Zielonaka-Lis and P. Kreidler (Eds), Chemistry in the Philo-sophical Melting Pot. Peter Lang, Frankfurt, pp. 39–58, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  • S. Weinberg, Life in the Universe. Scientific American271 (4): 44–51, (October) 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  • R. Westfall, Essays on the Trial of Galileo. University of Notre Dame Press, South Bend, IN, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  • A.K. Wheelock, Perspective, Optics, and Delft Artists Around 1650. Garland, New York, NY, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  • A.N. Whitehead, Science and the Modern World. Lowell Lectures, 1925.Free Press, New York, NY, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  • A.N. Whitehead, Process and Reality: An Essay in Cosmology (corrected edition), D. Griffin and D. Sherburne (Eds). Macmillan, New York, NY, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  • S. Wolfram, A New Kind of Science. Wolfram Media, Champaign, IL, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Earley, J.E. Would Introductory Chemistry Courses Work Better with a New Philosophical Basis?. Foundations of Chemistry 6, 137–160 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:FOCH.0000034992.42777.95

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:FOCH.0000034992.42777.95

Navigation