Abstract
It is argued that the conventional descriptions of chemical bonds as covalent, ionic, metallic, and Van der Waals are compromising the usefulness of quantum mechanics in the synthesis and design of new molecules and materials. Parallels are drawn between the state of chemistry now and when the idea that phlogiston was an element impeded the development of chemistry. Overcoming the current obstacles will require new methods to describe molecular structure and bonding, just as new concepts were needed before the phlogiston theory could be set aside.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
R.F.W. Bader. Atoms in Molecules: A Quantum Theory. New York: Oxford University Press, 1994.
H. Bilz. Z. Phys. 153: 338, 1958.
H. Butterfield. The Origins of Modern Science: 1300–1800.G. Bell & Sons, Ltd., 1957.
M. Cohen. Mat. Sci. Eng. 25: 3, 1976.
P. Costa and R.R. Conte. In J.T. Waber, P. Chiotli and W.N. Miner (Eds.), Compounds of Interest in Nuclear Reactor Technology. Inst. Metals Div., Sapec. Rep No. 13, Ann Arbor, MI, 1967
E. Dempsey. Philos. Mag. 8: 285, 1963.
P.A.M. Dirac. Proc. R. Soc., London A123: 714, 1929.
V. Ern and A.C. Switendick. Phys. Rev. A 137: 1927, 1968.
T. Hong and A.J. Freeman. Phys. Rev. B 43: 6446, 1991.
C.S. Smith. A Search for Structure, Cambridge,MA: MIT Press, 1981.
M.H. Yoo and C.L. Fu. Scripta Metall. 25: 2345, 1991.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Eberhart, M. Quantum Mechanics and Molecular Design in the Twenty First Century. Foundations of Chemistry 4, 201–211 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020655631654
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020655631654