Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Reanalysing selbst

  • Published:
Natural Language Semantics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper investigates the meaning of German selbst (≈ E N-self) in its intensifying use, and the relation of this selbst to the focus particle selbst (≈ E even). I propose that intensifying selbst denotes type-lifted variants of the identity function on the domain of individuals, and that the observed stress accents must be analysed in terms of by now well-established focus theories. This analysis covers the core range of data correctly, predicting obligatory stress on selbst, sortal restrictions, centrality effects, and the distribution of examples that express some kind of surprise. Moreover, it allows for a treatment of the reanalysis of intensifying selbst into focus particle selbst that stipulates fewer historical accidents than previous accounts.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Adelung, Johann Christoph: 1781/1977, Deutsche Sprachlehre. Reprint of the 1781 edition. Olms, Berlin and Hildesheim.

    Google Scholar 

  • Asher, Nicholas and Alex Lascarides: 1998, ‘Questions in Dialogue’, Linguistics and Philosophy 21, 237–310.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, Carl Leroy: 1995, ‘Contrast, Discourse Prominence, and Intensification, with Special Reference to Locally Free Reflexives in British English’, Language 71, 63–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Büring, Daniel: 1996, The 59th Street Bridge Accent, PhD dissertation, University of Tübingen. Published by Routledge, London.

  • Eckardt, Regine: 1999, ‘Focus with Nominal Quantifiers’, in P. Bosch and R. van der Sandt (eds.), The Focus Book, pp. 166–186. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edmondson, Jerold A. and Frans Plank: 1978, ‘Great Expectations: An Intensive Self Analysis’, Linguistics and Philosophy 2, 373–413.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fox, Danny: 2000, Economy and Semantic Interpretation. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grimm, Johann and Wilhelm Grimm: 1905, Deutsches Wörterbuch, vol. 10.1. S. Hirzel Verlag, Leipzig.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herburger, Elena: 1998, In the Event of Focus, PhD dissertation, University of Southern California, Los Angeles.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heine, Bernd, Ulrike Claudi and Friederike Hünnemeyer: 1991, Grammaticalization: A Conceptual Framework. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heine, Bernd: 1997, Possession: Cognitive Sources, Forces and Grammaticalization. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hole, Daniel: 1999, (untitled), manuscript on adnominal and adverbal intensifiers, Department of English Language and Literature, FU Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hopper, Paul J. and Elizabeth Closs Traugott: 1993, Grammaticalization. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs, Joachim: 1983, Fokus und Skalen. Zur Syntax und Semantik von Gradpartikeln im Deutschen. Niemeyer Verlag, Tübingen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kemmer, Suzanne: 1995, ‘Emphatic and Reflexive-Self: Expectations, Viewpoint, and Subjectivity’, in D. Stein and S. Wright (eds.), Subjectivity and Subjectivism, pp. 55–82. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • König, Ekkehart: 1992, The Meaning of Focus Particles: A Comparative Perspective. Routledge, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • König, Ekkehart and Peter Siemund: 1996, ‘Emphatische Reflexiva und Fokusstruktur: Zur Syntax und Bedeutung von “selbst”’, in I. Rosengren (ed.), Sprache und Pragmatik 40, pp. 1–42. Gleerup, Lund.

    Google Scholar 

  • König, Ekkehart and Peter Siemund: 2000, ‘Intensifiers as Sources and Targets of Semantic Change’, in K. v. Heusinger and R. Eckardt (eds.), Meaning Change - Meaning Variation (working paper no. 106), pp. 97–110. Fachbereich Sprachwissenschaft, Universität Konstanz.

  • König, Ekkehart and Elizabeth Closs Traugott: 1988, ‘Pragmatic Strengthening and Semantic Change: The Conventionalizing of Conversational Implicature’, in W. Hüllen and R. Schulze (eds.), Understanding the Lexicon: Meaning, Sense and World Knowledge in Lexical Semantics, pp. 110–124. Niemeyer, Tübingen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krifka, Manfred: 1991, ‘A Compositional Semantics for Multiple Focus Constructions’, in J. Jacobs (ed.), Informationsstruktur und Grammatik Linguistische Berichte, Sonderheft 4, 1991/92 pp. 17–53. Westdeutscher Verlag, Opladen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krifka, Manfred: 1993, ‘Focus and Presupposition in Dynamic Interpretation’, Journal of Semantics 10, 269–300.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krifka, Manfred: 1995, ‘The Semantics and Pragmatics of Polarity Items’, Linguistic Analysis 25, 209–257.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krifka, Manfred: 1998, ‘Additive Particles under Stress’, in D. Strolovitch and A. Lawson (eds.), SALT 8, pp. 111–128. Cornell University, Ithaca, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lang, Jürgen and Ingrid Neumann-Holzschuh: 1999, Reanalyse und Grammatikalisierung in den romanischen Sprachen. Niemeyer, Tübingen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lascarides, Alex and Nicholas Asher: 1993, ‘Temporal Interpretation, Discourse Relations and Commonsense Entailment’, Linguistics and Philosophy 16, 437–493.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moravcsik, Edith: 1972, ‘Some Cross-linguistic Generalizations about Intensifier Constructions’, in CLS 8, pp. 271–277. Chicago Linguistic Society, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Opitz, Martin: 1624/1978, Gesammelte Werke: Kritische Ausgabe. Bd. II: Die Werke von 1621 bis 1626, George Schulz-Behrend (ed.). Anton Hiersemann Verlag, Stuttgart.

    Google Scholar 

  • Primus, Beatrice: 1992, ‘Selbst-Variants of a Scalar Adverb in German’, in J. Jacobs (ed.), Informationsstruktur und Grammatik(Linguistische Berichte, Sonderheft 4, 1991/91), pp. 54–88. Westdeutscher Verlag, Opladen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reis, Marga and Inger Rosengren: 1997, ‘A Modular Approach to the Grammar of Additive Particles’, Journal of Semantics 14, 237–310.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rooth, Mats: 1985, Association with Focus, PhD dissertation, University of Massachusetts at Amherst.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rooth, Mats: 1992a, ‘A Theory of Focus Interpretation’, Natural Language Semantics 1, 75–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rooth, Mats: 1992b, ‘Ellipsis Redundancy and Reduction Redundancy’, in S. Berman and A. Hestvik (eds.), Proceedings of the Stuttgart Ellipsis Workshop, IMS, University of Stuttgart.

  • Schwarzschild, Roger: 1999, ‘GIVENness, AVOIDF and Other Constraints on the Placement of Accent’, Natural Language Semantics 7(2), 141–177.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siemund, Peter: 2000, Intensifiers in English and German - A Comparison. Routledge, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Stechow, Arnim: 1989, Focussing and Backgrounding Operators. Working paper no. 6, Fachgruppe Sprachwissenschaft, Universität Konstanz.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Fachbereich Sprachwissenschaft, University of Konstanz, Universitätsstr. 10, 78457, Konstanz, Germany

    Regine Eckardt

Authors
  1. Regine Eckardt
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Eckardt, R. Reanalysing selbst . Natural Language Semantics 9, 371–412 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014875209883

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014875209883

Keywords

Search

Navigation