Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Phaenomenologica ((PHAE,volume 95))

  • 129 Accesses

Abstract

As is well known, Husserl was throughout his life quite disdainful of Hegelian philosophy. It was only with great reluctance that he even mentioned Hegel a few times, even in those sections of his work in which he necessarily gave his own summary of the development of Western philosophy, namely in Erste Philosophic and in Krisis. And even when he was constrained to mention the philosophical contribution of Hegel, there was never any full discussion of dialectical logic. For a philosopher with such a deep concern for logic and the transcendental foundations of logic, this refusal to engage Hegel is puzzling, but certain. As my own early teachers of Husserl correctly insisted: If there is ever any doubt as to Husserl’s logical position on any disputed question, one will never go wrong in interpreting him in an anti-Hegelian sense. In the very few places where he forced himself to say something positive about Hegel, the best he could come up with was that Hegel’s thought provides us more with a Weltanschauung than with a strict philosophy.1

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Maurice Merleau-Ponty, The Primacy of Perception and Other Essays, ed. James M. Edie (Northwestern University Press, 1964 ), p. 72.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Suzanne Bachelard, A Study of Husserl’s Formal and Transcendental Logic, tr. Lester E. Embree (Northwestern University Press, 1968), pp. 222 ff.

    Google Scholar 

  3. James M. Edie, “The Meaning and Development of Merleau-Ponty’s Concept of Structualism,” Research in Phenomenology 10 (1980), pp. 50–1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Edmund Husserl, Die Krisis der europäischen Wissenschaften, Husserliana 6, ed. W. Biemel (The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 1954 ), p. 74.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Kah Kyung Cho

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1984 Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, Dordrecht/Boston/Lancaster

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Edie, J.M. (1984). The Hidden Dialectic in Edmund Husserl’s Phenomenology. In: Cho, K.K. (eds) Philosophy and Science in Phenomenological Perspective. Phaenomenologica, vol 95. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-6113-5_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-6113-5_6

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-009-6115-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-009-6113-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics