Skip to main content
Log in

On the hazards of whistleblowers and on some problems of young biomedical scientists in our time

  • Published:
Science and Engineering Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper examines two different, but closely related, classes of problems. The first part deals with whistleblowers, and the difficulties and dangers that they have often faced, although their actions, in the rare cases where they become necessary, are indispensable for the maintenance of honest science. The problems are illustrated by discussion of several specific cases from 1960 to 1990.

The second part deals with problems that face many young scientists today, and the stresses to which they are exposed in an increasingly competitive atmosphere. There are powerful pressures for premature publication, and many gifted scientists are driven to spend an inordinate amount of time in writing grant applications that are turned down for lack of funds, while receiving high praise from reviewers. Correction of conditions is an important matter for science policy; it is also important, among other things, to relieve pressures that would tend to encourage deviations from the standards necessary for trustworthy science.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bates H M, Craddock V M and Simpson M V (1960) The Biosynthesis of Cytochrome c in Cell-Free Systems,Journal of Biological Chemistry 235, 140–148.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bates H M and Lipmann F (1960) Identification of γ-Glutamyl Cysteinyl Ribonucleic Acid as Intermediary in Glutathione Synthesis,Journal of Biological Chemistry 235, PC 22.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Lane B G and Lipmann F (1961) Nonparticipation of Ribonucleic Acid in Glutathione and Opthalmic Acid Synthesis,Journal of Biological Chemistry 236, PC 80–81.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Simpson M V, Skinner D M and Lucas J M (1961) On the Biosynthesis of Cytochrome c,Journal of Biological Chemistry 236, PC 81–82.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Broad W and Wade N (1982)Betrayers of the Truth, Simon and Shuster, New York, pp 74–76.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Fruton J S (1994)Eighty Years, Epikouros Press, New Haven, pp 124–126.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Personal communication from Byron G. Lane.

  8. Webster G (1965) Studies on the Mechanism of Oxidative Phosphorylation. VIII. Purification of the Reduced Cytochrome c Coupling Factor,Journal of Biological Chemistry 240, 1365–1380.

    Google Scholar 

  9. For the case of Inez Austin, seeDefending the Earth: Abuses of Human Rights and the Environment, Human Rights Watch and Natural Resources Defense Council, June 1992, pp 102–103. This small book contains valuable reports of many other serious cases in many different countries.

  10. U.S. Congress (1988, April 12) Fraud in NIH Grant Programs, Dingell Subcommittee Hearings, Serial No, 100–189, pp 152–163.

  11. Baltimore D (1989) Baltimore’s Travels,Issues in Science and Technology 5 (4), 48–54.

    Google Scholar 

  12. National Research Council (1994)The Funding of Young Investigators in the Biological and Biomedical Sciences, National Academy Press, Washington D.C., 117 pp.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Edsall, J.T. On the hazards of whistleblowers and on some problems of young biomedical scientists in our time. Sci Eng Ethics 1, 329–340 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02583249

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02583249

Keywords

Navigation