Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

TNC Motives for Signing International Framework Agreements: A Continuous Bargaining Model of Stakeholder Pressure

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Over the past decade, discussion has flourished among practitioners and academics regarding workers’ rights in developing countries. The lack of enforcement of national labour laws and the limited protection of workers’ rights in developing countries have led workers’ rights representatives to attempt to establish transnational industrial relations systems to complement existing national systems. In practice, these attempts have mainly been operationalised in unilateral codes of conduct; recently, however, negotiated international framework agreements (IFAs) have been proposed as an alternative. Despite their growing importance, few studies have empirically studied IFAs. This paper starts to fill this gap by studying why corporations adopt IFAs, based on a qualitative study of the process leading to the signing of a recent IFA. The study’s findings complement existing research into why corporations adopt IFAs, codes of conduct, and CSR policies by demonstrating that corporate motives can be linked to a desire to retain a trusting relationship with the labour union movement. In addition, the findings indicate that the discrete campaign model of stakeholder pressure dominant in previous research should be complemented by a continuous bargaining model of stakeholder pressure. The paper concludes by discussing differences between these conceptual models of stakeholder pressure and avenues for future research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Ählström, J. and N. Egels-Zandén: 2008, ‹The Processes of Defining Corporate Responsibility: A Study of Swedish Garment Retailers’ Responsibility’, Business Strategy and the Environment http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bse.514

  • Allvin M., M. Sverke: 2000, Do New Generations Imply the End of Solidarity? Swedish Unionism in the Era of Individualization. Economic and Industrial Democracy 21, 71–95. doi:10.1177/0143831X00211004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andersen S. K.: 2006, Nordic Metal Trade Unions on the Move: Responses to Globalization and Europeanization. European Journal of Industrial Relations 12(1), 29–47. doi:10.1177/0959680106061366

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anner M., I. Greer, M. Hauptmeier, N. Lillie, N. Winchester: 2006, The Industrial Determinants of Transnational Solidarity: Global Interunion Politics in Three Sectors. European Journal of Industrial Relations 12(1), 7–27. doi:10.1177/0959680106061368

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arya B., J. E. Salk: 2006, Cross-Sector Alliance Learning and Effectiveness of Voluntary Codes of Corporate Social Responsibility. Business Ethics Quarterly 16(2), 211–234

    Google Scholar 

  • Bamber G. J., R. D. Lansbury (eds.): 1998, International and Comparative Employment Relations (Allen and Unwin, St Leonards, Australia)

    Google Scholar 

  • Bansal P., K. Roth: 2000, Why Companies Go Green: A Model of Ecological Responsiveness. Academy of Management Journal 43(4), 717–736. doi:10.2307/1556363

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bartley T.: 2005, Corporate Accountability and the Privatization of Labor Standards: Struggles over Codes of Conduct in the Apparel Industry. Research in Political Sociology 14, 211–244

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartley T.: 2007, Institutional Emergence in an Era of Globalization: The Rise of Transnational Private Regulation of Labor and Environmental Conditions. American Journal of Sociology 113(2), 297–351. doi:10.1086/518871

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bassett P., A. Cave: 1993, All for One: The Future of Unions (Fabian Society, London)

    Google Scholar 

  • Bondy K., D. Matten, J. Moon: 2004, The Adoption of Voluntary Codes of Conduct in MNCs: A Three-Country Comparative Study. Business & Society Review 109(4), 449–477 doi:10.1111/j.0045-3609.2004.00205.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braun R., J. Gearhart: 2004, Who Should Code Your Conduct? Trade Union and NGO Differences in the Fight for Workers’ Rights. Development in Practice, 14(1–2), 183–196. doi:10.1080/0961452032000170758

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carley M.: 2005, Global Agreements – State of Play. European Industrial Relations Review, 381, 14–18

    Google Scholar 

  • Chan A.: 1998, Labor Standards and Human Rights: The Case of Chinese Workers Under Market Socialism. Human Rights Quarterly 20(4), 886–904. doi:10.1353/hrq.1998.0036

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chan A., R. J. S. Ross: 2003, Racing to the Bottom: International Trade Without a Social Clause. Third World Quarterly 24(6), 1011–1028. doi:10.1080/01436590310001630044

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang D., M. Wong: 2005, After the Consumer Movement: Toward a New International Labour Activism in the Global Garment Industry. Labour, Capital and Society 38(1–2), 127–155

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen F.: 2003, Between the State and the Labour: The Conflict of Chinese Trade Unions’ Double Identity in Market Reform. The China Quarterly 176, 1006–1028. doi:10.1017/S0305741003000596

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christmann P., G. Taylor: 2002, Globalization and the Environment: Strategies for International Voluntary Environmental Initiatives. Academy of Management Executive 16(3), 121–135

    Google Scholar 

  • Compa L.: 2004, Trade Unions, NGOs, and Corporate Codes of Conduct. Development in Practice 14(1–2), 210–215. doi:10.1080/0961452032000170776

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooke F. L.: 2004, Foreign Firms in China: Modelling HRM in a Chinese Toy Manufacturing Corporation. Human Resource Management Journal 14(3), 31–52. doi:10.1111/j.1748-8583.2004.tb00125.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooney S., R. Lindsey, R. Mitchell, Y. Zhu (eds.): 2002, Law and Labour Market Regulation in Eastern Asia (Routledge, London)

    Google Scholar 

  • Connor T.: 2004, Time to Scale up Cooperation? Trade Unions, NGOs, and the International Anti-Sweatshop Movement. Development in Practice 14(1–2), 61–70. doi:10.1080/0961452032000170631

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Bakker F. G. A., F. den Hond: 2008, Introducing the Politics of Stakeholder Influence: A Review Essay. Business & Society 47(1), 8–20. doi:10.1177/0007650307306637

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diller J.: 1999, A Social Conscience in the Global Marketplace? Labour Dimensions of Codes of Conduct, Social Labelling and Investor Initiatives. International Labour Review 138(2), 99–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DiMaggio P. J., W. W. Powell: 1983, The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields. American Sociological Review 48(2), 147–160. doi:10.2307/2095101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ding D. Z., M. Warner: 1999, “Re-inventing” China’s Industrial Relations at Enterprise-Level: An Empirical Field Study in Four Major Cities. Industrial Relations Journal 30(3), 243–260. doi:10.1111/1468-2338.00123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doellgast V., I. Greer: 2007, Vertical Disintegration and the Disorganization of German Industrial Relations. British Journal of Industrial Relations 45(1), 55–76. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8543.2007.00602.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donaldson T., L. E. Preston: 1995, The Stakeholder Theory of the Corporation: Concepts, Evidence, and Implications. Academy of Management Review 20(1), 65–91. doi:10.2307/258887

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunlop J. T.: 1958, Industrial Relations Systems (Henry Holt, New York, NY)

    Google Scholar 

  • Eade D.: 2004, Editorial Overview. Development in Practice 14(1–2), 5–12. doi:10.1080/0961452032000170587

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Egels-Zandén, N.: 2008, ‹Shifting Locus of Influence in the Labor Union Movement: Negotiations in International Framework Agreements’, Journal of Current Issues in Globalization (in press)

  • Egels-Zandén N., P. Hyllman: 2006, Exploring the Effects of Union-NGO Relationships on Corporate Responsibility: The Case of the Swedish Clean Clothes Campaign. Journal of Business Ethics 64(3), 303–316. doi:10.1007/s10551-005-5497-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Egels-Zandén N., P. Hyllman: 2007, Evaluating Strategies for Negotiating Workers’ Rights in Transnational Corporations: The Effects of Codes of Conduct and Global Agreements on Workplace Democracy. Journal of Business Ethics 76(2), 207–223 doi:10.1007/s10551-006-9269-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Esbenshade J.: 2001, The Social Accountability Contract: Private Monitoring from Los Angeles to the Global Apparel Industry. Labor Studies Journal 26(1), 98–120

    Google Scholar 

  • Fairbrother P., N. Hammer: 2005, Global Unions: Past Efforts and Future Prospects. Relations Industrielles/Industrial Relations 60(3), 405–429

    Google Scholar 

  • Frenkel S., S. Kim: 2004, Corporate Codes of Labour Practice and Employment Relations in Sports Shoe Contractor Factories in South Korea. Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources 42(1), 6–31. doi:10.1177/1038411104041537

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frooman J.: 1999, Stakeholder Influence Strategies. Academy of Management Review 24(2), 191–205. doi:10.2307/259074

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frundt H. J.: 2004, Unions Wrestle with Corporate Codes of Conduct. WorkingUSA 7(4), 36–69

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallin D.: 2000, Trade Unions and NGOs: A Necessary Partnership for Social Development (United Nations Research Institute for Social Development, Geneva)

    Google Scholar 

  • Giddens A: 1991, Modernity and Self-Identity: Self and Society in the Late Modern Age (Polity Press, Cambridge, UK)

    Google Scholar 

  • Graafland J. J.: 2004, Collusion, Reputation Damage and Interest in Codes of Conduct: The Case of a Dutch Construction Company. Business Ethics: A European Review 13(2/3), 127–142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guay T., J. P. Doh, G. Sinclair: 2004, Non-Governmental Organizations, Shareholder Activism, and Socially Responsible Investments: Ethical, Strategic, and Governance Implications. Journal of Business Ethics 52(1), 125–139. doi:10.1023/B:BUSI.0000033112.11461.69

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guillén M., D. Melé, P. Murphy: 2002, European vs. American Approaches to Institutionalization of Business Ethics: The Spanish Case. Business Ethics: A European Review 11(2), 167–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gumbrell-McCormick R.: 2000, Facing New Challenges: The International Confederation of Free Trade Unions (1972–1990s). In: A. Carew, M. Dreyfus, G. Van Goethem, R. Gumbrell-McCormick, M. van der Lindsen (eds.), The International Confederation of Free Trade Unions (Peter Lang, Bern), pp. 341–517

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammer N.: 2005, International Framework Agreements: Global Industrial Relations Between Rights and Bargaining. Transfer 11(4), 511–530

    Google Scholar 

  • International Textile, Garment and Leather Workers’ Federation: 2007, Draft International Framework Agreement (http://www.itglwf.org/doc/IFADraft.doc)

  • International Metalworkers’ Federation: 2006, Recommendations of the International Framework Agreement (IFA)␣Conference, 26/27 September 2006 (Frankfurt, Germany)

  • Justice D. W.: 2003, Corporate Social Responsibility: Challenges and Opportunities for Trade Unionists. Labour Education 130, 1–13

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuruvilla S., A. Verma: 2006, International Labor Standards, Soft Regulation, and National Government Roles. Journal of Industrial Relations 48(1), 41–58. doi:10.1177/0022185606059313

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lau R. W. K.: 2001, Social-Political Control in Urban China: Changes and Crises. British Journal of Sociology 52(4), 605–620 doi:10.1080/00071310120084490 Medline

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leahy J. T.: 2001, Making Room for Labour in Business Ethics. Journal of Business Ethics 29(1), 33–43. doi:10.1023/A:1006490808748

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee T. W.: 1999, Understanding Qualitative Methods in Organizational Research (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA)

    Google Scholar 

  • Liew L. H.: 2001, What is to be Done? WTO, Globalisation and State-Labour Relations in China. Australian Journal of Politics and History 47(1), 39–60. doi:10.1111/1467-8497.00218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lipschutz R. D.: 2004, Sweating It Out: NGO Campaigns and Trade Union Empowerment. Development in Practice 14(1–2), 197–209. doi:10.1080/0961452032000170767

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Long B. S., C. Driscoll: 2008, Codes of Ethics and the Pursuit of Organizational Legitimacy: Theoretical and Empirical Contributions. Journal of Business Ethics 77(2), 173–189. doi:10.1007/s10551-006-9307-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lyon D.: 1999, Postmodernity (Open University Press, Buckingham)

    Google Scholar 

  • Maguire S., C. Hardy, T. B. Lawrence: 2004, Institutional Entrepreneurship in Emerging Fields: HIV/AIDS Treatment Advocacy in Canada. Academy of Management Journal 47(5), 657–679

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall C., G. B. Rossman: 1995, Designing Qualitative Research (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA)

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer J., B. Rowan: 1977, Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony. The American Journal of Sociology 83(2), 340–363. doi:10.1086/226550

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Michalos A. C.: 1997, Issues for Business Ethics in the Nineties and Beyond. Journal of Business Ethics 16(3), 219–230. doi:10.1023/A:1017926723225

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller D.: 2004, Preparing for the Long Haul: Negotiating International Framework Agreements in the Global Textile, Garment and Footwear Sector. Global Social Policy 4(2), 215–239. doi:10.1177/1468018104045110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muller-Camen M., P. Almond, P. Gunnigle, J. Quintanilla, A. Tempel: 2001, Between Home and Host Country: Multinationals and Employment Relations in Europe. Industrial Relations Journal 32(5), 435–448. doi:10.1111/1468-2338.00210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nijhof A., S. Cludts, O. Fisscher, A. Laan: 2003, Measuring the Implementation of Codes of Conduct: An Assessment Method Based on a Process Approach of the Responsible Organisation. Journal of Business Ethics 45(1), 65–78. doi:10.1023/A:1024172412561

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Brian R., A. M. Goetz, J. A. Scholte, M. Williams: 2000, Contesting Global Governance: Multilateral Economic Institutions and Global Social Movements (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge)

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Rourke D.: 2003, Outsourcing Regulation: Analyzing Nongovernmental Systems of Labor Standards and Monitoring. The Policy Study Journal 31(1), 1–29. doi:10.1111/1541-0072.00001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phelps Brown H.: 1990, The Counter Revolution of Our Time. Industrial Relations 29(1), 1–14

    Google Scholar 

  • Provis C.: 2006, Industrial Relations, Ethics and Conscience. Business Ethics: A European Review 15(1), 64–75

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Riisgaard L.: 2005, International Framework Agreements: A New Model for Securing Workers Rights?. Industrial Relations 44(4), 707–737. doi:10.1111/j.1468-232X.2005.00408.x

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts S.: 2003, Supply Chain Specific? Understanding the Patchy Success of Ethical Sourcing Initiatives. Journal of Business Ethics 44(2–3), 159–170. doi:10.1023/A:1023395631811

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roman J.: 2004, The Trade Union Solution or the NGO Problem? The Fight for Global Labour Rights. Development in Practice 14(1–2), 100–109. doi:10.1080/096145203200017068

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Royle T.: 2005, Realism or Idealism? Corporate Social Responsibility and the Employee Stakeholder in the Global Fast-Food Industry. Business Ethics: A European Review 14(1), 42–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schlegelmilch B., J. Houston: 1989, Corporate Codes of Ethics in Large UK Companies: An Empirical Investigation of Use, Content and Attitudes. European Journal of Marketing 23(6), 7–24. doi:10.1108/EUM0000000000571

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schueth S.: 2003, Socially Responsible Investing in the United States. Journal of Business Ethics 43(3), 189–194. doi:10.1023/A:1022981828869

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sethi S. P.: 1999, Codes of Conduct for Multinational Corporations: An Idea Whose Time has Come. Business & Society Review 104(3), 225–241. doi:10.1111/0045-3609.00052

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sethi S. P., L. M. Sama: 1998, Ethical Behavior as a Strategic Choice by Large Corporations: The Interactive Effect of Marketplace Competition, Industry Structure and Firm Resources. Business Ethics Quarterly 8(1), 85–104. doi:10.2307/3857523

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shanahan S., S. Khagram: 2006, Dynamics of Corporate Responsibility. In G. S. Drori, J. W. Meyer, H. Hwang (eds.), Globalization and Organization: World Society and Organizational Change (Oxford University Press, Oxford), pp. 196–224)

    Google Scholar 

  • Sobczak A.: 2007, Legal Dimensions of International Framework Agreements in the Field of Corporate Social Responsibility. Relations Industrielles/Industrial Relations 62(3), 466–491

    Google Scholar 

  • Sparkes R., C. J. Cowton: 2004, The Maturing of Socially Responsible Investment: A Review of the Developing Link with Corporate Social Responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics 52(1), 45–57. doi:10.1023/B:BUSI.0000033106.43260.99

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spooner D.: 2004, Trade Unions and NGOs: The Need for Cooperation. Development in Practice 14(1–2), 19–33. doi:10.1080/0961452032000170604

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turnbull P.: 2006, The War on Europe’s Waterfront: Repertoires of Power in the Port Transport Industry. British Journal of Industrial Relations 44(2), 305–326. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8543.2006.00499.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Valor C.: 2005, Corporate Social Responsibility and Corporate Citizenship: Towards Corporate Accountability. Business & Society Review 110(2), 191–212. doi:10.1111/j.0045-3609.2005.00011.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Roozendaal G.: 2002, Trade Unions and Global Governance: The Debate on a Social Clause (Continuum, London)

    Google Scholar 

  • van Tulder R., A. Kolk: 2001, Multinationality and Corporate Ethics: Codes of Conduct in the Sporting Goods Industry. Journal of International Business Studies 32(2), 267–283. doi:10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8490952

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waddington J.: 2006, Contesting the Development of European Works Councils in the Chemical Sector. European Journal of Industrial Relations 12(3), 329–352. doi:10.1177/0959680106068916

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waddock S., C. Bodwell, S. B. Graves: 2002, Responsibility: The New Business Imperative. Academy of Management Executive 16(2), 132–148

    Google Scholar 

  • Warner M.: 1996, Economic Reforms, Industrial Relations and Human Resources in the People’s Republic of China: An Overview. Industrial Relations Journal 27(3), 195–210. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2338.1996.tb00769.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weaver G. R.: 1993, Corporate Codes of Ethics: Purpose, Process and Content Issues. Business & Society 32(1), 44–58. doi:10.1177/000765039303200106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wills J.: 1998, Uprooting Tradition: Rethinking the Place and Space of Labour Organization. European Planning Studies 6(1), 31–42

    Google Scholar 

  • Wills J.: 2001, Uneven Geographies of Capital and Labour: The Lessons of European Works Councils. Antipode, 33(3), 484–509. doi:10.1111/1467-8330.00195

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wills J.: 2002, Bargaining for the Space to Organize in the Global Economy: A Review of the Accor-IUF Trade Union Rights Agreement. Review of International Political Economy 9(4), 675–700

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wright C., A. Rwabizambuga: 2006, Institutional Pressures, Corporate Reputation, and Voluntary Codes of Conduct: An Examination of the Equator Principles. Business & Society Review 111(1), 89–117. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8594.2006.00263.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu Y., S. Fahey: 1999, The Impact of Economic Reform on Industrial Labour Relations in China and Vietnam. Post-Communist Economies 11(2), 173–192. doi:10.1080/14631379995977

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Centre for Business in Society, School of Business, Economics and Law at University of Gothenburg, Box 600, Gothenburg, 405 30, Sweden

    Niklas Egels-Zandén

Authors
  1. Niklas Egels-Zandén
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Niklas Egels-Zandén.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Egels-Zandén, N. TNC Motives for Signing International Framework Agreements: A Continuous Bargaining Model of Stakeholder Pressure. J Bus Ethics 84, 529–547 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-008-9722-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-008-9722-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation