Skip to main content
Log in

Gender in medical ethics: Re-examining the conceptual basis of empirical research

  • Published:
Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Conducting empirical research on gender in medical ethics is a challenge from a theoretical as well as a practical point of view. It still has to be clarified how gender aspects can be integrated without sustaining gender stereotypes. The developmental psychologist Carol Gilligan was among the first to question ethics from a gendered point of view. The notion of care introduced by her challenged conventional developmental psychology as well as moral philosophy. Gilligan was criticised, however, because her concept of ‘two different voices’ may reinforce gender stereotypes. Moreover, although Gilligan stressed relatedness, this is not reflected in her own empirical approach, which still focuses on individual moral reflection. Concepts from social psychology can help overcome both problems. Social categories like gender shape moral identity and moral decisions. If morality is understood as being lived through actions of persons in social relationships, gender becomes a helpful category of moral analysis. Our findings will provide a conceptual basis for the question how empirical research in medical ethics can successfully embrace a gendered perspective.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allmark, Peter: 1995, ‘Can There Be an Ethics of Care?’ Journal of Medical Ethics 21(1), 19-24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allmark, Peter: 1996, ‘Reply to Ann Bradshaw’ (‘Yes! There Is an Ethics of Care: An Answer for Peter Allmark’), Journal of Medical Ethics 22, 13-15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Apel, Karl-Otto: 1988, Diskurs und Verantwortung. Das Problem des Übergangs zur postkonventionellen Moral. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arend, Arie van der and Chris Gastmans: 31998, Ethisch zorg verlenen — handboek voor de verpleegkundige beroepen. Baarn: Intro.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barbour, Allen: 1995, Caring for Patients. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beauchamp, Tom L. and James F. Childress: 1979, Principles of Biomedical Ethics. New York, Oxford.

  • Bem, Sandra L.: 1974, ‘The Measurement of Psychological Androgyny’, Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 42(2), 155-162.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benhabib, Seyla: 1992, Situating the Self. Gender, Community and Postmodernism in Contemporary Ethics. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benner, Patricia: 1997, ‘A Dialogue Between Virtue Ethics and Care Ethics’, Theoretical Medicine 18 (March–June), 46-61.

  • Benner, Patricia and Judith Wrubel: 1988, The Primacy of Caring — Stress and Coping in Health and Illness. Boston, MA: Addison Wesley Longman Publishing Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bergmann, Jörg and Thomas Luckmann: 1999, Die kommunikative Konstruktion von Moral. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biller-Andorno, Nikola: 2001, Gerechtigkeit und Fürsorge. Zur Möglichkeit einer integrativen Medizinethik. Frankfurt, New York: Campus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blumer, Herbert: 1969, Symbolic Interaction: Perspective and Method. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bochner, Stephen and Robert Perks: 1971, ‘National Role Evocation as a Function of Cross-national Interaction’, Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology 2, 157-164.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradshaw, Ann: 1996, ‘Yes! There is an Ethics of Care: An Answer for Peter Allmark’, Journal of Medical Ethics 22(1), 8-12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brykczyńska, Gosia: 1997, Caring: the Compassion and Wisdom of Nursing. London, Sydney, Auckland: Arnold.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burke, Peter J.: 1980, The Self: ‘Measurement Requirements from an Interactionist Perspective’, Social Psychology Quarterly 43, 18-29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carse, Alisa L.: 1998, ‘Impartial Principle and Moral Context: Securing a Place for the Particular in Ethical Theory’, Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 23(2), 153-169.

    Google Scholar 

  • Colby, Anne and Lawrence Kohlberg: 1984, ‘Invariant Sequence and Internal Consistency in Moral Judgment Stages’, in: William M. Kurtines and Jacob L. Gerwirtz (eds.), Morality, Moral Behavior, and Moral Development. New York: Wiley, pp. 41-51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conradi, Elisabeth: 2001, Take Care. Grundlagen einer Ethik der Achtsamkeit. Frankfurt am Main: Campus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conradi, Elisabeth: 2003, ‘Agency and Social Change in the Light of an Ethic of Care. Some Thoughts About Collective Moral Judgment and Moral Action’, in: Sasha Roseneil and Linda Hogan (eds.), Feminism, Agency and Ethics (forthcoming).

  • Deaux, Kay and Marianne Lafrance: 1998, ‘Gender’, in: Daniel T. Gilbert, Susan T. Fiske and Lindzey Gardner (eds.), The Handbook of Social Psychology, 4th ed. New York: Mc Graw Hill, pp. 788-827.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deaux, Kay and Brenda Major: 1987, ‘Putting Gender into Context. An Interactive Model of Gender-related Behaviour’, Psychological Review 94, 369-389.

    Google Scholar 

  • Döbert, Rainer and Natalie Juranek: 2000, ‘Zur Rolle von Begrifflichkeiten: Die Auswirkungen eines Gerechtigkeitsrahmens auf die Aufschlüsselung eines moralischen Dilemmas — Eine Forschungsnotiz’, in: Wolfgang Edelstein and Gertrud Nunner-Winkler (eds.), Moral im sozialen Kontext. Frankfurt am Main; Suhrkamp, pp. 234-258.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, Marilyn: 1995, ‘Beyond Caring: the De-Moralization of Gender’, in: Virginia Held (ed.), Justice and Care. Essential Readings in Feminist Ethics. Boulder, CO: Harper Collins, pp. 61-77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fry, Sara T.: 1989, ‘The Role of Caring in a Theory of Nursing Ethics’, Hypatia 4(2), 88-103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilligan, Carol, Janie V. Ward and Jill M. Taylor (eds.): 1988, Mapping the Moral Domain. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilligan, Carol: 1982, In a Different Voice: Psychological Theory and Women's Development. Cambridge, MA; London: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilligan, Carol: 1987, ‘Moral Orientation and Moral Development’, in: Eva F. Kittay and Diana T. Meyers (eds.), Women and Moral Theory. Totowa, New Jersey: Rowan and Littlefield, pp. 19-33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, Suzanne, Patricia Benner and Nel Noddings (eds.): 1996, Caregiving. Readings in Knowledge, Practice, Ethics, and Politics. Philadelphia, PA: Pennsylvania University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, Jürgen: 1990, Moral Consciousness and Communicative Action. Boston: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, Jürgen: 1989/90, ‘Justice and Solidarity: On the Discussion Concerning Stage 6’, Philosophical Forum 21(1–2) (Fall/Winter), 40-47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hogg, Michael A.: 1996, ‘Social Identity, Self-categorisation, and the Small Group’, in: E.H. Witte and J.H. Davis (eds.), Understanding Group Behaviour: Small Group Process and Interpersonal Relations, Vol. 2. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum, pp. 227-254.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hogg, Michael A., Deborah J. Terry and Katherine M. White: 1995, ‘A Tale of Two Theories: A Critical Comparison of Identity Theory with Social Identity Theory’, in: Social Psychology Quarterly 58(4), 255-269.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kant, Immanuel: 1997, Critique of Practical Reason. Cambridge Texts in the History of Philosophy. Cambridge UP (orig. 1788).

  • Kant, Immanuel: 1998, Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Moral. Cambridge UP (orig. 1785/86).

  • Kohlberg, Lawrence: 1981, The Philosophy of Moral Development. Essays on Moral Development. Vol. 1. San Francisco: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krol, Sandera and Selma Sevenhuijsen: 1992, Ethics and Morality in Feminism. An interdisciplinary Bibliography. Anna Maria van Schuurman Centrum, Department Women’s Studies, Faculty Social Sciences, Utrecht University.

  • Little, Margaret O.: 1998, ‘Care: From Theory to Orientation and Back’, Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 23(2), 190-209.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loewy, Erich: 1995, ‘Care Ethics: A Concept in Search of a Framework’, Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 4, 56-63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maihofer, Andrea: 2000, ‘Ethic of Care’, in: Alison M. Jagger, and Iris Young (eds.), A Companion to Feminist Philosophy. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers, pp. 383-392.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manschot, Henk and Marian Verkerk (eds.): 1994, Ethiek van de zorg. Een discussie. Amsterdam and Meppel: Boom.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCall, George and Jerry Simons: 1978, Identities and Interactions. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mead, George H.: 1934, Mind, Self, and Society: From the Standpoint of a Social Behaviorist. Ed. and with an introduction by C.W. Morris. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morse, Janice M. (ed.): 1992, Qualitative Health Research. Newbury Park, London, New Delhi.

  • Moskowitz, Debbie S., Eun J. Suh and Julie Desaulniers: 1994, ‘Situational Influences on Gender Differences in Agency and Communion’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 66(4), 753-761.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, Hilde L: 1992, ‘Against Caring’, Journal of Clinical Ethics 3(1), 8-15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicholson, Linda: 1983, ‘Woman, Morality and History’, Social Research 50(3), 514-536.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nunner-Winkler, Gertrud: 1984, ‘Two Moralities? A Critical Discussion of an Ethic of Care and Responsibility Versus an Ethic of Rights and Justice’, in: William M. Kurtines and Jacob L. Gewirtz (eds.), Morality, Moral Behaviour, and Moral Development. New York: Wiley, pp. 348-361.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peabody, F.W.: 1984, ‘The Care of the Patient’, Journal of the American Medical Association 99, 877-882.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, John: 1971, A Theory of Justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reich, Warren T.: 1995, ‘Historical Dimensions of an Ethic of Care in Health Care’, in: Warren T. Reich (ed.), Encyclopedia of Bioethics. New York: Simon & Schuster Macmillan, pp. 331-336.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider-Düker, Marianne and André Kohle: 1988, ‘Die Erfassung von Geschlechtsrollen — Ergebnisse der deutschen Neukonstruktion des Bem Sex-Role-Inventory’, Diagnostica 34(3), 256-279.

    Google Scholar 

  • Self, D.J., D.E. Schrader, D.C. Baldwin Jr. and F.D. Wolinsky: 1993, ‘The Moral Development of Medical Students: A Pilot Study of the Possible Influence of Medical Education’, Medical Education 27, 26-34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sevenhuijsen, Selma: 1998, Citizenship and the Ethics of Care: Feminist Considerations on Justice, Morality and Politics. London, New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharpe, Virginia: 1992, ‘Justice and Care: the Implications of the Kohlberg-Gilligan Debate for Medical Ethics’, Theoretical Medicine 13(4), 295-318.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spiro, Howard, Mary McCrea Curnen, Enid Peschel and Deborah St. James (eds.): 1993, Empathy and the Practice of Medicine. New Haven, London: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stryker, Sheldon: 1968, ‘Identity Salience and Role Performance: The Importance of Symbolic Interaction Theory for Family Research’, Journal of Marriage and the Family 30, 558-564.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stryker, Sheldon and Anne Statham: 1985, ‘Symbolic Interaction and Role Theory’, in: G. Lindzey and E. Aronson (eds.), The Handbook of Social Psychology. New York: Random House, pp. 311-378.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tajfel, Henri (ed.): 1982, Social Identity and Intergroup Relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tajfel, Henri: 1978, Differentiation Between Groups: Studies in the Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations. London: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tronto, Joan C.: 1987, ‘Beyond Gender Difference to a Theory of Care’, Signs 12(4) (Summer), 644-663.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tronto, Joan C.: 1993, Moral Boundaries: A Political Argument for an Ethic of Care. New York, London.

  • Turner, John C.: 1982, ‘Towards a Cognitive Redefinition of the Group’, in: Henri Tajfel (ed.), Social Identity and Intergroup Relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 15-40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, John C. and Penelope J. Oakes: 1989, ‘Self-Categorization Theory and Social Influence’, in: Paul B. Paulus (ed.), The Psychology of Group Influence. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, pp. 233-279.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, John C.: 1999, ‘Some Current Issues in Research on Social Identity and Self-categorization Theories’, in: Naomi Ellemers, Russell Spears and Doosje Bertjan (eds.), Social Identity: Context, Commitment, Content. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Hooft, Stan: 1996, ‘Bioethics and Caring’, Journal of Medical Ethics 22, 83-89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Veatch, Robert M.: 1998, ‘The Place of Care in Ethical Theory’, Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 23(2), 210-224.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wren, Thomas E., Wolfgang Edelstein and Gertrud Nunner-Winkler (eds.): 1990, The Moral Domain. Essays in the Ongoing Discussion Between Philosophy and the Social Sciences. Cambridge, MA, London: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Elisabeth Conradi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Conradi, E., Biller-Andorno, N., Boos, M. et al. Gender in medical ethics: Re-examining the conceptual basis of empirical research. Med Health Care Philos 6, 51–58 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022514821765

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022514821765

Navigation