Skip to main content
Log in

Was leistet die evolutionäre Erkenntnistheorie?

Eine Kritik und Würdigung

  • Diskussion
  • Published:
Zeitschrift für allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

The author takes a collection of essays on concepts and approaches inevolutionary epistemology** as the occasion for a critical discussion of the limits and achievements of evolutionary epistemology as well as of certain philosophical objections to the very project itself. She comes to the conclusion that evolutionary epistemology, even if it cannot explain cognition (Erkenntnis) itself, can nevertheless shed light on the complex phenomenon of cognition by demonstrating the presence of traces of our evolutionary past in cognition. Modern research into the structure and functioning of the brain supports this conclusion. The author argues that the questions which evolutionary epistemology can legitimately pose and answer are such that it is not in competition with traditional epistemology. For this reason she suggests that this research program be renamed „evolutionäre Informationstheorie“, in the hope that its aims will become clearer to proponents as well as opponents. In the final section the author discusses the possibility that an evolutionary approach might explain the fact that human beings are less and less capable of dealing with the complexity of the world they have created.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literatur

  1. Campbell, Donald T.: „Evolutionary Epistemology.“ (prepared 1965/66) in: P. A. Schilpp (Ed.)The Philosophy of Karl Popper, I, La Salle: Open Court, 1974, pp. 413–463.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Engels, Eve-Marie: „Freiheit als Illusion?“ Bericht über das 4. Symposium der Civitas-Gesellschaft.Information Philosophie. 5 (1983), S. 16–30.

    Google Scholar 

  3. --: Die Evolutionäre Erkenntnistheorie in der Diskussion, erscheint inInformation Philosophie (1985), 1 und 2.

  4. Gehlen, Arnold:Der Mensch. Seine Natur und seine Stellung in der Welt. Frankfurt: Athenäum, 19719 (1940).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Gould, Stephen Jay und N. Eldredge: „Puncutated Equilibria: An Alternative to Phyletic Gradualism.“ In: T. J. M. Schopf (Ed.):Models in Paleobiology. San Francisco: Freeman, Cooper and Co, 1972, pp. 82–115.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Lorenz, Konrad:Die Rückseite des Spiegels. Versuch einer Naturgeschichte menschlichen Erkennens. München: dtv, 19804 (1973).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Piaget, Jean:Biologie und Erkenntnis. Frankfurt: Fischer Taschenbuch Verlag, 1983. Zuerst ersch. bei Frankfurt: S. Fischer, 1974. (Aus dem Franz.: Biologie et Connaissance, Paris 1967).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Riedl, Rupert (unter Mitarbeit von Robert Kaspar):Biologie der Erkenntnis. Die stammesgeschichtlichen Grundlagen der Vernunft. Berlin/Hamburg: Parey, 19813 (1979).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Stegmüller, Wolfgang:Probleme und Resultate der Wissenschaftstheorie und Analytischen Philosophie. Bd. I, 2., verb. und erw. Aufl. Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer, 1983 (1969).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Vollmer, Gerhard:Evolutionäre Erkenntnistheorie. Stuttgart: Hirzel, 19813 (1975).

    Google Scholar 

  11. von Weizsäcker, Carl Friedrich:Der Garten des Menschenlichen. Frankfurt: Fischer Taschenbuch Verlag 1982 (1977).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Engels, EM. Was leistet die evolutionäre Erkenntnistheorie?. Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 16, 113–146 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01800837

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01800837

Navigation