Abstract
In this paper, domain-specificity is presented as an understudied problem in chemical education. This argument is unpacked by drawing from two bodies of literature: learning of science and epistemology of science, both themes that have cognitive as well as philosophical undertones. The wider context is students’ engagement in scientific inquiry, an important goal for science education and one that has not been well executed in everyday classrooms. The focus on science learning illustrates the role of domain specificity in scientific reasoning. The discussion on epistemology of science presents ideas from the emerging field of philosophy of chemistry to highlight the much neglected area of epistemology in chemical education. Domain-specificity is exemplified in the context of chemical laws, in particular the Periodic Law. The applications of the discussion for chemical education are explored in relation to argumentation, itself an epistemologically grounded discourse pattern in science. The overall implications include the need for reconceptualization of the nature of teaching and learning in chemistry to include more particular epistemological aspects of chemistry.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
American Association for the Advancement of Science.: Project 20: Science for all Americans. Washington, DC (1989)
Anderson, J.R.: Language, Memory, and Thought. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ (1976)
Bhushan, N., Rosenfeld, S.: Of Minds and Molecules. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2000)
Brito, A., Rodriguez, M.A., Niaz, M.: A reconstruction of development of the periodic table based on history and philosophy of science and its implications for general chemistry textbooks. J. Res. Sci. Teach. 42(1), 84–111 (2005)
Carnap, P.: The Logical Structure of the World (R. A. George, Trans.). University of California Press, Berkeley (Originally published, 1928) (1928/1967)
Cartwright, N.: How the Laws of Physics Lie. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK (1983)
Christie, M., Christie, J.: “Laws” and “theories” in chemistry do not obey the rules. In: Bhushan, N., Rosenfeld, S. (eds.) Of Minds and Molecules, pp. 34–50. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2000)
Christie, M.: Chemists versus philosophers regarding laws of nature. Stud. Hist. Philos. Sci. 25, 613–629 (1994)
Clement, J.: Analogical reasoning patterns in expert problem-solving. In: Proceedings of the 4th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, vol. 8, pp. 223–234. Ann Arbor, MI (1982)
Del Re, G., Liegener, C.: The relation of chemistry to other fields of science: atomism, reductionism and reversal of reductionism. Epistemologia 10, 269–282 (1987)
Dunbar, K.: Concept discovery in a scientific domain. Cogn. Sci. 17, 397–434 (1993)
Duschl, R.: Restructuring Science Education: The Role of Theories and Their Importance. Teachers’ College Press, New York (1990)
Duit, R.: Research on students’ conceptions: developments and trends. In: Pfundt, H., Duit, R. (eds.) Bibliography: Students’ Alternative Frameworks and Science Education, 4th edn. IPN at the University of Kiel, Kiel, Germany (1994)
Erduran, S.: Editorial: argument discourse and interactivity. Sch. Sci. Rev. 88(324), 29–30 (2007), Special Issue
Erduran, S., Jimenez-Aleixandre, M.P. (eds.): Argumentation in Science Education: Perspectives from classroom-based research. Springer, Dordrecht (in press)
Erduran, S., Aduriz-Bravo, A., Mamlok-Naaman, R.: Developing epistemolologically empowered teachers: Examining the role of philosophy of chemistry in teacher education. Science and Education (in press)
Erduran, S.: Promoting ideas, evidence and argument in initial teacher training. Sch. Sci. Rev. 87(321), 45–50 (2006)
Erduran, S.: Applying the philosophical concept of reduction to the chemistry of water: implications for chemical education. Sci. Educ. 14(2), 161–171 (2005)
Erduran, S., Simon, S., Osborne, J.: TAPping into argumentation: developments in the use of Toulmin’s argument pattern in studying science discourse. Sci. Educ. 88(6), 915–933 (2004)
Erduran, S., Duschl, R.: Interdisciplinary characterizations of models and the nature of chemical knowledge in the classroom. Stud. Sci. Educ. 40, 111–144 (2004)
Erduran, S., Scerri, E.: The nature of chemical knowledge and chemical education. In: Gilbert, J., de Jong, O., Justi, R., Treagust, D., van Driel, J. (eds.) Chemical Education: Towards Research-Based Practice, pp. 7–27. Kluwer, Dordrecht (2002)
Erduran, S.: Philosophy of chemistry: an emerging field with implications for chemistry education. Sci. Educ. 10(6), 581–593 (2001)
Fensham, P., Gunstone, R., White, R. (eds.): The Content of Science: A Constructivist Approach to its Teaching and Learning. The Falmer Press, Bristol, PA (1995)
Gable, D., Bunce, D.: Research on problem solving in chemistry. In: Gabel, D. (ed.) Handbook of Research on Science Teaching and Learning, pp. 301–326. Macmillan Publishing Company, New York (1994)
Garratt, J., Overton, T., Threlfall, T.: A Question of Chemistry: Creative Problems for Critical Thinkers. Pearson, Harlow (1999)
Giere, R.N.: Science without Laws. University of Chicago Press, Chicago (1999)
Giere, R.: Understanding Scientific Reasoning, 3rd edn. Holt, Rinehart, and Winston, Fort Worth, TX (1991)
Gilbert, J., de Jong O., Justi R., Treagust D., van Driel J. (eds.): Chemical Education: Towards Research-Based Practice. pp. 7–27. Kluwer, Dordrecht (2002)
Gilbert, J.K., Watts, D.M.: Concepts, misconceptions and alternative conceptions: changing perspective in science education. Stud. Sci. Educ. 10, 61–98 (1983)
Glaser, R.: Application and theory: learning theory and the design of learning environments. In: Proceedings of the Keynote Address Presented at the 23rd International Congress of Applied Psychology, Madrid, Spain (1994)
Goldsworthy, A., Watson, R., Wood-Robinson, V.: Developing Understanding in Scientific Enquiry. Association for Science Education, Hatfield (2000)
Hart, C.: Doing a Literature Review: Releasing the Social Science Research Imagination. Sage, London (1998)
Hempel, C.G.: Aspects of scientific explanation. In: Hempel, C.G. (ed.) Aspects of Scientific Explanation and Other Essays in the Philosophy of Science. Macmillan, New York (1965)
Hodson, D.: Towards a philosophically more valid science curriculum. Sci. Educ. 72, 19–40 (1988)
Hoffmann, R.: How should chemists think? Sci. Am. 66–73 (1993)
Hoffmann, R.: The Same and Not the Same. Columbia University Press, New York (1995)
Hoffmann, R., Laszlo, P.: Representation in chemistry. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 30(1), 1–16 (1991)
Hoffmann, R., Torrence, V.: Chemistry Imagined: Reflections on Science. Smithsonian Institute Press, Washington DC (1993)
Jimenez-Aleixandre, M., Rodrigues, A., Duschl, R.: “Doing the Lesson” or “Doing Science”: argument in high school genetics. Sci. Educ. 84(6), 757–792 (2000)
Jimenez-Aleixandre, M., Rodrigues, A., Duschl, R.: “Doing the Lesson” or “Doing Science”: argument in high school genetics. Sci. Educ. 84(6), 757–792 (2000)
Kauffman, G.B., Szmant, H.H.: The Central Science: Essays on the Uses of Chemistry. Texas Christian University Press, Fort Worth (1984)
Kelly, G., Takao, A.: Epistemic levels in argument: an analysis of university oceanography students’ use of evidence in writing. Sci. Educ. 86(3), 314–342 (2002)
Keogh, B., Naylor, S.: Concept cartoons, teaching and learning in science: an evaluation. Int. J. Sci. Educ. 21(4), 431–446 (1999)
Kitcher, P.: The child as parent of the scientist. Mind Lang. 3(3), 215–228 (1988)
Kornblith, H. (ed.): Naturilizing Epistemology. MIT, Cambridge, MA (1985)
Kuhn, T.: The structure of scientific revolutions (2nd ed.) University of Chicago Press, Chicago (1962/1970)
Kuhn, D.: Thinking as argument. Harv. Educ. Rev. 62, 155–178 (1992)
Larkin, J., Reif, F., Carbonell, J., Gugliotta, A.: A flexible expert reasoner with multi-domain inferencing. Cogn. Sci. 12, 101–138 (1988)
Latour, B., Woolgar, S.: Laboratory Life: The Construction of Scientific Facts, 2nd edn. Princetown University Press, Princetown, NJ (1986)
Laudan, L.: The pseudo-science of science. Philos. Soc. Sci. 11, 173–198 (1981)
Matthews, M.: Science Teaching: The Role of History and Philosophy of Science. Routledge, New York (1994)
Nagel, E.: The Structure of Science. Harcourt, New York (1961)
Naylor, S., Keogh, B.: Concept Cartoons in Education. Millgate House Publishers, Sandbach (2000)
National Research Council.: National Science Education Standards. National Academy Press, Washington DC (1996)
Nercessian, N.: Constructing and instructing: the role of “abstraction techniques” in creating and learning physics. In: Duschl, R., Hamilton, R. (eds.) Philosophy of Science, Cognitive Psychology, and Educational Theory and Practice, pp. 48–68. State University of New York Press, New York (1992)
Nye, M.J.: From Chemical Philosophy to Theoretical Chemistry. University of California Press, Berkeley (1993)
Ogborn, J.: Ownership and transformation: teachers using curriculum innovation. Phys. Educ. 37, 142–146 (2002)
Osborne, J., Erduran, S., Simon, S.: Enhancing the quality of argumentation in school science. J. Res. Sci. Teach. 41(10), 994–1020 (2004)
Osborne, J.F.: Practical alternatives. Sch. Sci. Rev. 78(285), 61–66 (1997)
Pauling, L.: Why modern chemistry is quantum chemistry. New. Sci. 54–55 (1985)
Pfundt, H., Duit, R.: Bibliography: Students’ Alternative Frameworks in Science Education. Institut fur die Padagogik der Naturwissenschaften an der Universitat Kiel, Kiel (1994)
Popper, K.: The Logic of Scientific Discovery. Hutchinson, London (1959)
Primas, H.: Chemistry, Quantum Mechanics and Reduction. Springer, Berlin (1983)
Rheinberger, H.J.: Toward a History of Epistemic Things: Synthesizing Proteins in the Test Tube. Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA (1997)
Salmon, M.H., Earman, J., Glymour, C., Lennox, J.G., Machamer, P., McGuire, J.E., Norton, J.D., Salmon, W.C., Schaffner, K.F.: Introduction to the Philosophy of Science. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ (1992)
Scerri, E.: Chemistry spectroscopy and the question of reduction. J. Chemi. Educ. 68(2) 122–126 (1991)
Scerri, E.: Prediction of the nature of hafnium from chemistry, Bohr’s theory and quantum theory. Ann. Sci. 51, 137–150 (1994a)
Scerri, E.: Has chemistry been at least approximately reduced to quantum mechanics? In: Hull, D., Forbes, M., Burian, R. (eds.) Philosophy of Science Association vol. 1. (pp 160–170). East Lansing, MI: Philosophy of science association (1994b)
Scerri, E.: Stephen Brush, the periodic table and the nature of chemistry. In: Janich, P., Psarros, N. (eds.) 2nd Erlenmeyer Colloquium on the Philosophy of Chemistry. Koningshausen & Neumann, Marburg University, Wurtzburg (1996)
Scerri, E.R., McIntryre, L.: The case for the philosophy of chemistry. Synthese 111, 213–232 (1997)
Scerri, E.: Philosophical confusion in chemical education research. J. Chem. Educ. 80(5), 468–474 (2003)
Scerri, E., Worrall. J.: Prediction and the Periodic table. Stud. Hist. Philos. Sci. 32A, 407–452 (2001)
Schraagen, J.M.: How experts solve a novel problem in experimental design. Cogn. Sci. 17(2), 285–309 (1993)
Schwab, J.: The teaching of science as inquiry. Bull. At. Sci. 14, 374–379 (1958)
Schwab, J.: The teaching of science as enquiry. In: Schwab, J., Brandwein P. (eds.) The reaching of science (pp. 3–103) Harvard University Press, MA, Cambridge (1962)
Schwab, J.: The structure of the natural sciences. In: Ford, G.W., Pugno, L. (eds.) The structure of knowledge and the curriculum. Rand McNally, Chicago (1964)
Schunn, C.D., Anderson, J.R.: The generality/specificity of expertise in scientific reasoning. Cognitive Sci. 23, 337–370 (1999)
Solomon, J., Duveen, J., Scott, L.: Exploring the Nature of Science: Key Stage 4. Association for Science Education, Hatfield (1992)
Thagard, P.: Conceptual Revolutions. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ (1992)
Toulmin, S.: The Uses of Argument. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1958)
van Brakel, J., Vermeeren, H.: On the philosophy of chemistry, Philosophy research archives, 1405–1456 (1981)
van Brakel, J.: On the neglect of the philosophy of chemistry. Paper presented at the first international conference on philosophy of chemistry. London (1994)
van Brakel, J.: The Philosophy of Chemistry. University of Louvain Press, Louvain (2000)
Voss, J.F., Tyler, S.W., Yengo, L.A.: Individual differences in the solving of social science problems. In: Dillon, R.F., Schmeck, R.R. (eds.) Individual Differences in Cognition, vol. 1. Academic, New York (1983)
Welch, W.W.: Twenty years of science education development: a look back. Rev. Res. Educ 7, 282–306 (1979)
White, R.T.: Dimensions of content. In: Fensham, P., Gunstone, R., White, R. (eds.) The Content of Science: A Constructivist Approach to its Teaching and Learning. The Falmer Press, Bristol, PA (1995)
White, R., Gunstone, R.: Probing Understanding. Falmer Press, London (1992)
Zuckermann, J.J.: The coming renaissance of descriptive chemistry. J. Chem. Educ. 63, 829 (1986)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Erduran, S. Breaking the law: promoting domain-specificity in chemical education in the context of arguing about the periodic law. Found Chem 9, 247–263 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10698-007-9036-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10698-007-9036-z