Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Breaking the law: promoting domain-specificity in chemical education in the context of arguing about the periodic law

  • Published:
Foundations of Chemistry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper, domain-specificity is presented as an understudied problem in chemical education. This argument is unpacked by drawing from two bodies of literature: learning of science and epistemology of science, both themes that have cognitive as well as philosophical undertones. The wider context is students’ engagement in scientific inquiry, an important goal for science education and one that has not been well executed in everyday classrooms. The focus on science learning illustrates the role of domain specificity in scientific reasoning. The discussion on epistemology of science presents ideas from the emerging field of philosophy of chemistry to highlight the much neglected area of epistemology in chemical education. Domain-specificity is exemplified in the context of chemical laws, in particular the Periodic Law. The applications of the discussion for chemical education are explored in relation to argumentation, itself an epistemologically grounded discourse pattern in science. The overall implications include the need for reconceptualization of the nature of teaching and learning in chemistry to include more particular epistemological aspects of chemistry.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • American Association for the Advancement of Science.: Project 20: Science for all Americans. Washington, DC (1989)

  • Anderson, J.R.: Language, Memory, and Thought. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ (1976)

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhushan, N., Rosenfeld, S.: Of Minds and Molecules. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  • Brito, A., Rodriguez, M.A., Niaz, M.: A reconstruction of development of the periodic table based on history and philosophy of science and its implications for general chemistry textbooks. J. Res. Sci. Teach. 42(1), 84–111 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carnap, P.: The Logical Structure of the World (R. A. George, Trans.). University of California Press, Berkeley (Originally published, 1928) (1928/1967)

  • Cartwright, N.: How the Laws of Physics Lie. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK (1983)

    Google Scholar 

  • Christie, M., Christie, J.: “Laws” and “theories” in chemistry do not obey the rules. In: Bhushan, N., Rosenfeld, S. (eds.) Of Minds and Molecules, pp. 34–50. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  • Christie, M.: Chemists versus philosophers regarding laws of nature. Stud. Hist. Philos. Sci. 25, 613–629 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clement, J.: Analogical reasoning patterns in expert problem-solving. In: Proceedings of the 4th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, vol. 8, pp. 223–234. Ann Arbor, MI (1982)

  • Del Re, G., Liegener, C.: The relation of chemistry to other fields of science: atomism, reductionism and reversal of reductionism. Epistemologia 10, 269–282 (1987)

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunbar, K.: Concept discovery in a scientific domain. Cogn. Sci. 17, 397–434 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duschl, R.: Restructuring Science Education: The Role of Theories and Their Importance. Teachers’ College Press, New York (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  • Duit, R.: Research on students’ conceptions: developments and trends. In: Pfundt, H., Duit, R. (eds.) Bibliography: Students’ Alternative Frameworks and Science Education, 4th edn. IPN at the University of Kiel, Kiel, Germany (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  • Erduran, S.: Editorial: argument discourse and interactivity. Sch. Sci. Rev. 88(324), 29–30 (2007), Special Issue

    Google Scholar 

  • Erduran, S., Jimenez-Aleixandre, M.P. (eds.): Argumentation in Science Education: Perspectives from classroom-based research. Springer, Dordrecht (in press)

  • Erduran, S., Aduriz-Bravo, A., Mamlok-Naaman, R.: Developing epistemolologically empowered teachers: Examining the role of philosophy of chemistry in teacher education. Science and Education (in press)

  • Erduran, S.: Promoting ideas, evidence and argument in initial teacher training. Sch. Sci. Rev. 87(321), 45–50 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  • Erduran, S.: Applying the philosophical concept of reduction to the chemistry of water: implications for chemical education. Sci. Educ. 14(2), 161–171 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erduran, S., Simon, S., Osborne, J.: TAPping into argumentation: developments in the use of Toulmin’s argument pattern in studying science discourse. Sci. Educ. 88(6), 915–933 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erduran, S., Duschl, R.: Interdisciplinary characterizations of models and the nature of chemical knowledge in the classroom. Stud. Sci. Educ. 40, 111–144 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erduran, S., Scerri, E.: The nature of chemical knowledge and chemical education. In: Gilbert, J., de Jong, O., Justi, R., Treagust, D., van Driel, J. (eds.) Chemical Education: Towards Research-Based Practice, pp. 7–27. Kluwer, Dordrecht (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  • Erduran, S.: Philosophy of chemistry: an emerging field with implications for chemistry education. Sci. Educ. 10(6), 581–593 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fensham, P., Gunstone, R., White, R. (eds.): The Content of Science: A Constructivist Approach to its Teaching and Learning. The Falmer Press, Bristol, PA (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  • Gable, D., Bunce, D.: Research on problem solving in chemistry. In: Gabel, D. (ed.) Handbook of Research on Science Teaching and Learning, pp. 301–326. Macmillan Publishing Company, New York (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  • Garratt, J., Overton, T., Threlfall, T.: A Question of Chemistry: Creative Problems for Critical Thinkers. Pearson, Harlow (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  • Giere, R.N.: Science without Laws. University of Chicago Press, Chicago (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  • Giere, R.: Understanding Scientific Reasoning, 3rd edn. Holt, Rinehart, and Winston, Fort Worth, TX (1991)

  • Gilbert, J., de Jong O., Justi R., Treagust D., van Driel J. (eds.): Chemical Education: Towards Research-Based Practice. pp. 7–27. Kluwer, Dordrecht (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, J.K., Watts, D.M.: Concepts, misconceptions and alternative conceptions: changing perspective in science education. Stud. Sci. Educ. 10, 61–98 (1983)

    Google Scholar 

  • Glaser, R.: Application and theory: learning theory and the design of learning environments. In: Proceedings of the Keynote Address Presented at the 23rd International Congress of Applied Psychology, Madrid, Spain (1994)

  • Goldsworthy, A., Watson, R., Wood-Robinson, V.: Developing Understanding in Scientific Enquiry. Association for Science Education, Hatfield (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  • Hart, C.: Doing a Literature Review: Releasing the Social Science Research Imagination. Sage, London (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  • Hempel, C.G.: Aspects of scientific explanation. In: Hempel, C.G. (ed.) Aspects of Scientific Explanation and Other Essays in the Philosophy of Science. Macmillan, New York (1965)

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodson, D.: Towards a philosophically more valid science curriculum. Sci. Educ. 72, 19–40 (1988)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoffmann, R.: How should chemists think? Sci. Am. 66–73 (1993)

  • Hoffmann, R.: The Same and Not the Same. Columbia University Press, New York (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffmann, R., Laszlo, P.: Representation in chemistry. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 30(1), 1–16 (1991)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoffmann, R., Torrence, V.: Chemistry Imagined: Reflections on Science. Smithsonian Institute Press, Washington DC (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  • Jimenez-Aleixandre, M., Rodrigues, A., Duschl, R.: “Doing the Lesson” or “Doing Science”: argument in high school genetics. Sci. Educ. 84(6), 757–792 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jimenez-Aleixandre, M., Rodrigues, A., Duschl, R.: “Doing the Lesson” or “Doing Science”: argument in high school genetics. Sci. Educ. 84(6), 757–792 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kauffman, G.B., Szmant, H.H.: The Central Science: Essays on the Uses of Chemistry. Texas Christian University Press, Fort Worth (1984)

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, G., Takao, A.: Epistemic levels in argument: an analysis of university oceanography students’ use of evidence in writing. Sci. Educ. 86(3), 314–342 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keogh, B., Naylor, S.: Concept cartoons, teaching and learning in science: an evaluation. Int. J. Sci. Educ. 21(4), 431–446 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kitcher, P.: The child as parent of the scientist. Mind Lang. 3(3), 215–228 (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  • Kornblith, H. (ed.): Naturilizing Epistemology. MIT, Cambridge, MA (1985)

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, T.: The structure of scientific revolutions (2nd ed.) University of Chicago Press, Chicago (1962/1970)

  • Kuhn, D.: Thinking as argument. Harv. Educ. Rev. 62, 155–178 (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  • Larkin, J., Reif, F., Carbonell, J., Gugliotta, A.: A flexible expert reasoner with multi-domain inferencing. Cogn. Sci. 12, 101–138 (1988)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Latour, B., Woolgar, S.: Laboratory Life: The Construction of Scientific Facts, 2nd edn. Princetown University Press, Princetown, NJ (1986)

    Google Scholar 

  • Laudan, L.: The pseudo-science of science. Philos. Soc. Sci. 11, 173–198 (1981)

    Google Scholar 

  • Matthews, M.: Science Teaching: The Role of History and Philosophy of Science. Routledge, New York (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagel, E.: The Structure of Science. Harcourt, New York (1961)

    Google Scholar 

  • Naylor, S., Keogh, B.: Concept Cartoons in Education. Millgate House Publishers, Sandbach (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council.: National Science Education Standards. National Academy Press, Washington DC (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  • Nercessian, N.: Constructing and instructing: the role of “abstraction techniques” in creating and learning physics. In: Duschl, R., Hamilton, R. (eds.) Philosophy of Science, Cognitive Psychology, and Educational Theory and Practice, pp. 48–68. State University of New York Press, New York (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  • Nye, M.J.: From Chemical Philosophy to Theoretical Chemistry. University of California Press, Berkeley (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  • Ogborn, J.: Ownership and transformation: teachers using curriculum innovation. Phys. Educ. 37, 142–146 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Osborne, J., Erduran, S., Simon, S.: Enhancing the quality of argumentation in school science. J. Res. Sci. Teach. 41(10), 994–1020 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Osborne, J.F.: Practical alternatives. Sch. Sci. Rev. 78(285), 61–66 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  • Pauling, L.: Why modern chemistry is quantum chemistry. New. Sci. 54–55 (1985)

  • Pfundt, H., Duit, R.: Bibliography: Students’ Alternative Frameworks in Science Education. Institut fur die Padagogik der Naturwissenschaften an der Universitat Kiel, Kiel (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  • Popper, K.: The Logic of Scientific Discovery. Hutchinson, London (1959)

    Google Scholar 

  • Primas, H.: Chemistry, Quantum Mechanics and Reduction. Springer, Berlin (1983)

    Google Scholar 

  • Rheinberger, H.J.: Toward a History of Epistemic Things: Synthesizing Proteins in the Test Tube. Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  • Salmon, M.H., Earman, J., Glymour, C., Lennox, J.G., Machamer, P., McGuire, J.E., Norton, J.D., Salmon, W.C., Schaffner, K.F.: Introduction to the Philosophy of Science. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  • Scerri, E.: Chemistry spectroscopy and the question of reduction. J. Chemi. Educ. 68(2) 122–126 (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  • Scerri, E.: Prediction of the nature of hafnium from chemistry, Bohr’s theory and quantum theory. Ann. Sci. 51, 137–150 (1994a)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scerri, E.: Has chemistry been at least approximately reduced to quantum mechanics? In: Hull, D., Forbes, M., Burian, R. (eds.) Philosophy of Science Association vol. 1. (pp 160–170). East Lansing, MI: Philosophy of science association (1994b)

  • Scerri, E.: Stephen Brush, the periodic table and the nature of chemistry. In: Janich, P., Psarros, N. (eds.) 2nd Erlenmeyer Colloquium on the Philosophy of Chemistry. Koningshausen & Neumann, Marburg University, Wurtzburg (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  • Scerri, E.R., McIntryre, L.: The case for the philosophy of chemistry. Synthese 111, 213–232 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scerri, E.: Philosophical confusion in chemical education research. J. Chem. Educ. 80(5), 468–474 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scerri, E., Worrall. J.: Prediction and the Periodic table. Stud. Hist. Philos. Sci. 32A, 407–452 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schraagen, J.M.: How experts solve a novel problem in experimental design. Cogn. Sci. 17(2), 285–309 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwab, J.: The teaching of science as inquiry. Bull. At. Sci. 14, 374–379 (1958)

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwab, J.: The teaching of science as enquiry. In: Schwab, J., Brandwein P. (eds.) The reaching of science (pp. 3–103) Harvard University Press, MA, Cambridge (1962)

  • Schwab, J.: The structure of the natural sciences. In: Ford, G.W., Pugno, L. (eds.) The structure of knowledge and the curriculum. Rand McNally, Chicago (1964)

  • Schunn, C.D., Anderson, J.R.: The generality/specificity of expertise in scientific reasoning. Cognitive Sci. 23, 337–370 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Solomon, J., Duveen, J., Scott, L.: Exploring the Nature of Science: Key Stage 4. Association for Science Education, Hatfield (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  • Thagard, P.: Conceptual Revolutions. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  • Toulmin, S.: The Uses of Argument. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1958)

    Google Scholar 

  • van Brakel, J., Vermeeren, H.: On the philosophy of chemistry, Philosophy research archives, 1405–1456 (1981)

  • van Brakel, J.: On the neglect of the philosophy of chemistry. Paper presented at the first international conference on philosophy of chemistry. London (1994)

  • van Brakel, J.: The Philosophy of Chemistry. University of Louvain Press, Louvain (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  • Voss, J.F., Tyler, S.W., Yengo, L.A.: Individual differences in the solving of social science problems. In: Dillon, R.F., Schmeck, R.R. (eds.) Individual Differences in Cognition, vol. 1. Academic, New York (1983)

    Google Scholar 

  • Welch, W.W.: Twenty years of science education development: a look back. Rev. Res. Educ 7, 282–306 (1979)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White, R.T.: Dimensions of content. In: Fensham, P., Gunstone, R., White, R. (eds.) The Content of Science: A Constructivist Approach to its Teaching and Learning. The Falmer Press, Bristol, PA (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  • White, R., Gunstone, R.: Probing Understanding. Falmer Press, London (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  • Zuckermann, J.J.: The coming renaissance of descriptive chemistry. J. Chem. Educ. 63, 829 (1986)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Bristol, Bristol, BS8 1JA, UK

    Sibel Erduran

Authors
  1. Sibel Erduran
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sibel Erduran.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Erduran, S. Breaking the law: promoting domain-specificity in chemical education in the context of arguing about the periodic law. Found Chem 9, 247–263 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10698-007-9036-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10698-007-9036-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation