Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Could a Created Being Ever be Creative? Some Philosophical Remarks on Creativity and AI Development

  • Published:
Minds and Machines Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Creativity has a special role in enabling humans to develop beyond the fulfilment of simple primary functions. This factor is significant for Artificial Intelligence (AI) developers who take replication to be the primary goal, since moves toward creating autonomous artificial-beings beg questions about their potential for creativity. Using Wittgenstein’s remarks on rule-following and language-games, I argue that although some AI programs appear creative, to call these programmed acts creative in our terms is to misunderstand the use of this word in language. I conclude that replication is not the best way forward for AI development in matters of creativity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Comment taken from the film The Age of Intelligent Machines by Ray Kurzweil (1987).

References

  • Boden, M. A. (Ed.). (1994). Dimensions of creativity. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boden, M. A. (1999). Computer models of creativity. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 351–372). Cambridge: CUP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boden, M. A. (2004). The creative mind: Myths and mechanisms. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bohm, D. (1996). On creativity. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Churchland, P. M. (1988). Matter and consciousness: Contemporary introduction to the philosophy of mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gabora, L. (2002). Cognitive mechanisms underlying the creative process. In Proceedings of the 4th conference on creativity & cognition, 126–133.

  • Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1988). Freedom and constraint in creativity. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), The nature of creativity: Contemporary psychological perspectives (pp. 202–219). Cambridge: CUP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langley, P., & Jones, R. J. (1988). A computational model of scientific insight. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), The nature of creativity: Contemporary psychological perspectives (pp. 177–201). Cambridge: CUP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martindale, C. (1999). Biological bases of creativity. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 137–152). Cambridge: CUP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Novitz, D. (1999). Creativity and constraint. Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 77(1), 67–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saunders, R., & Gero, J. S. (2002). How to study artificial creativity. In Proceedings of the 4th conference on creativity & cognition, 80–7.

  • Schank, R. C. (1988). Creativity as a mechanical process. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), The nature of creativity: Contemporary psychological perspectives (pp. 220–238). Cambridge: CUP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg, R. J. (Ed.). (1999). Handbook of creativity. Cambridge: CUP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ward, T. B., Smith, S. M., & Finke, R. A. (1999). Creative cognition. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 189–212). Cambridge: CUP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wittgenstein, L. (1966). Lectures and conversations on aesthetics, psychology and religious belief. In C. Barrett (Ed.). Oxford: Blackwell.

  • Wittgenstein, L. (2001). Philosophical investigations (G. E. M. Anscombe, Trans.). Oxford: Blackwell.

Download references

Acknowledgments

Thanks are due to the AISB 2008 convention attendees who kindly accepted a philosopher into their conference and gave generous amounts of feedback. Thanks especially to Rob Baron, Mark Bishop, Brook Pearson, Arthur Gibson and Jerry Goodenough for their helpful and insightful comments and suggestions. I am grateful also to the anonymous reviewers for the AISB who gave valuable advice on an early version of this paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Y. J. Erden.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Erden, Y.J. Could a Created Being Ever be Creative? Some Philosophical Remarks on Creativity and AI Development. Minds & Machines 20, 349–362 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11023-010-9202-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11023-010-9202-2

Keywords

Navigation