Abstract
In Part V of his Discourse on the Method, Descartes introduces a test for distinguishing people from machines that is similar to the one proposed much later by Alan Turing. The Cartesian test combines two distinct elements that Keith Gunderson has labeled the language test and the action test. Though traditional interpretation holds that the action test attempts to determine whether an agent is acting upon principles, I argue that the action test is best understood as a test of common sense. I also maintain that this interpretation yields a stronger test than Turing's, and that contemporary artificial intelligence should consider using it as a guide for future research.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adler, M.J. (1967), The Difference of Man and the Difference it Makes, New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Chomsky, N. (1966), Cartesian Linguistics, New York: Harper and Row.
Cottingham, J. (1978), 'A Brute to the Brutes?', Philosophy 53, pp. 551–559.
Damasio, A.R. (1994), Descartes' Error, New York: G.P. Putnam.
Dennett, D.C. (1991), Consciousness Explained, Boston: Little, Brown and Co.
Descartes, R. (1985), The Philosophical Writings of Descartes, trans. and ed. by J. Cottingham, R. Stoothoff, D. Murdoch, and A. Kenny, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Cited in text as CSM.)
Egenhofer,M. and Mark, D.M. (1995), 'Naive Geography', in A.U. Frank and W. Kuhn, eds., Spatial Information Theory: A Theoretical Basis for GIS, Berlin/New York: Springer, pp. 1–15.
Erion, G.J. (2000), Common Sense: An Investigation in Ontology, Epistemology, and Moral Philosophy, unpublished doctoral dissertation, University at Buffalo, State University of New York.
Forguson, L. (1989), Common Sense, New York: Routledge.
Gunderson, K. (1964), 'Descartes, La Mettrie, Language, and Machines', Philosophy 39, pp. 193–222.
Harnad, S. (1991), 'Other Bodies, Other Minds: A Machine Incarnation of an Old Philosophical Problem', Minds and Machines 1, pp. 43–54.
Hauser, L. (1993), 'Reaping the Whirlwind', Minds and Machines 3, pp. 219–238.
Hayes, P.J. (1985a), 'Naive Physics I: Ontology for Liquids', in J.R. Hobbs and R.C. Moore, eds., Formal Theories of the Common-Sense World, Norwood, NJ: Ablex, pp. 71–107.
Hayes, P.J. (1985b). 'The Second Naive Physics Manifesto', in J.R. Hobbs and R.C. Moore, eds., Formal Theories of the Common Sense World, Norwood, NJ: Ablex, pp. 1–36.
Horton, R. (1982), 'Tradition and Modernity Revisited', in M. Hollis and S. Lukes, eds., Rationality and Relativism, Oxford: Basil Blackwell pp. 201–260.
Leiber, J. (1989), 'Re(ad) Me; Re(ad) Myself', Philosophy and Literature 13, pp. 134–139.
Macnamara, J. (1986), A Border Dispute: The Place of Logic in Psychology, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Radner, D. and Radner, M. (1989), Animal Consciousness. Buffalo: Prometheus.
Radner, D. and Radner, M. (1995), 'Cognition, Natural Selection, and the Intentional Stance', International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 9, pp. 109–119.
Ryle, G. (1971), 'Knowing How and Knowing That', in Collected Papers of Gilbert Ryle, Vol. II. New York: Barnes and Noble, pp. 212–225. (Original work published in 1945.)
Shieber, S.M. (1994), 'Lessons From a Restricted Turing Test', Communications of the ACM 37, pp. 70–78.
Smith, B. (1994), 'The Structures of the Common-SenseWorld', in S. Poggi, ed., Gestalt Psychology: Its Origins, Foundations, and Influence, Firenze: L.S. Olschki, pp. 209–232.
Turing, A.M. (1950), 'Computing Machinery and Intelligence', Mind 59, pp. 433–460.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Erion, G.J. The Cartesian Test for Automatism1. Minds and Machines 11, 29–39 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011258623649
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011258623649