Kepler's theory of the soul: a study on epistemology

9Citations
Citations of this article
19Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Kepler is mainly known among historians of science for his astronomical theories and his approaches to problems having to do with philosophy of science and ontology. This paper attempts to contribute to Kepler studies by providing a discussion of a topic not frequently considered, namely Kepler's theory of the soul, a general theory of knowledge whose central problem is what makes knowledge possible, rather than what makes knowledge true, as happens in the case of Descartes's and Bacon's epistemologies. Kepler's theory consists of four issues: the theory of the different sorts of soul-that is, the human soul, the animal soul, the vegetable soul, and the Earth soul-concerning their faculties, the differences and the resemblances emerging among them, the relation they maintain with their own bodies and the world, and the distinction soul-world. The paper discusses these issues from a historical perspective, that is, it reconstructs the way they appear in three periods of Kepler's career: the period prior to the publication of the Mysterium cosmographicum, the period from 1596 to 1611, and the period of the Harmonices mundi libri V. Finally, Kepler's epistemology is briefly contrasted with Descartes's and Bacon's in order to suggest that Kepler's could be seen as a third way to understand the philosophical origins of Modernity. © 2007 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Escobar, J. M. (2008). Kepler’s theory of the soul: a study on epistemology. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A, 39(1), 15–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsa.2007.11.002

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free