Skip to main content
Log in

Holism in Cartesianism and in Today's Philosophy of Physics

  • Published:
Journal for General Philosophy of Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to contribute to a more balanced judgement than the widespread impression that the changes which are called for in today's philosophy of physics and which centre around the concept of holism amount to a rupture with the framework of Cartesian philosophy of physics. I argue that this framework includes a sort of holism: As a result of the identification of matter with space, any physical property can be instantiated only if there is the whole of matter. Relating this holism to general relativity, I maintain that this holism cannot be directly applied to today's philosophy of physics consequent upon the failure of geometrodynamics. I show in what respect precisely the holism in quantum physics amounts to a revision of the holism within Cartesianism.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Aspect, A., Dalibard, J. and Roger, G.: 1982, 'Experimental Test of Bell's Inequalities Using Time-Varying Analyzers', Physical Review Letters 49, 1804–1807.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Auyang, S. Y.: 1995, How is Quantum Field Theory Possible?, New York, Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell, J. S.: 1964, 'On the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen-Paradox', Physics 1, 195–200.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, J.: 1988, A Study of Spinoza's 'Ethics', Indianapolis, Hackett. Second printing of the first edition 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bohm, D.: 1951, Quantum Theory, Englewood Cliffs, Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Broad, C. D.: 1933, An Examination of McTaggart's Philosophy, Vol. 1, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, K.: 1976, Metaphysics. An Introduction, Encino, Dickensen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clifford, W. K.: 1876, 'On the Space-Theory of Matter', Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society 2, 157–158. Reprinted in James R. Newman (ed.), The World of Mathematics 1, New York, Simon and Schuster, 1956, pp. 568- 569.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cottingham, J., Stoothoff, R. and Murdoch, D.: 1984- 1991, The Philosophical Writings ofDescartes. 3 Volumes, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Curley, E. M.: 1985, The Collected Works of Spinoza 1, Princeton, Princeton UniversityPress.

    Google Scholar 

  • Curley, E. M.: 1991, 'On Bennett's Interpretation of Spinoza's Monism', in Y. Yovel (ed.), God and Nature: Spinoza's Metaphysics, Leiden, Brill, pp. 35–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • d'Espagnat, B.: 1971, Conceptual Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Menlo Park, Benjamin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Descartes, R.: 1965- 1973, OEuvres. 11 volumes. Ch. Adam and P. Tannery (eds.), Paris, Vrin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Einstein, A.: 1948, 'Quanten-Mechanik und Wirklichkeit', Dialectica 2, 320–324.

    Google Scholar 

  • Einstein, A., Podolsky, B. and Rosen, N.: 1935, 'Can Quantum-Mechanical Description of Physical Reality be Considered Complete?', Physical Review 47, 777–780.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Esfeld, M.: 1998, 'Holism and Analytic Philosophy', Mind 107, 365–380.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Esfeld, M.: forthcoming, 'Der Holismus der Quantenphysik: Seine Bedeutung und seineGrenzen', forthcoming in Philosophia Naturalis 36 (1999), first issue.

  • French, S. and Redhead, M. L. G.: 1988, 'Quantum Physics and the Identity of Indiscernibles', British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 39, 233–246.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graves, J. C.: 1971, The Conceptual Foundations of Contemporary Relativity Theory, Cambridge (Massachusetts), MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartz, G. A.: 1989, 'Leibniz on why Descartes' Metaphysics of Body is Necessarily False', in: N. Rescher (ed.), Leibnizian Inquiries: A Group of Essays, Lanham, University of America Press, pp. 23–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Healey, R. A.: 1991, 'Holism and Nonseparability', Journal of Philosophy 88, 393–421.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hesse, M. B.: 1961, Forces and Fields. The Concept of Action at a Distance in the History of Physics, London, Nelson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman, J. and Rosenkrantz, G. S.: 1994, Substance Among Other Categories, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howard, D.: 1989, 'Holism, Separability, and the Metaphysical Implications of the Bell Experiments', in J. T. Cushing and E. McMullin (eds.), Philosophical Consequences of Quantum Theory. Reflections on Bell's Theorem, Notre Dame, University of Notre Dame Press, pp. 224–253.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lecrivain, A.: 1986, 'Spinoza and Cartesian Mechanics', in M. Grene and D. Nails (eds.), Spinoza and the Sciences, Dordrecht: Reidel, pp. 15–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mathews, F.: 1989, 'Some Reflections on Spinoza's Theory of Substance', Philosophia 19, 3–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Misner, C. W.: 1974, 'Some Topics for Philosophical Inquiry Concerning the Theories of Mathematical Geometrodynamics and of Physical Geometrodynamics', in K. F. Schaffner and R. S. Cohen (eds.), PSA 1972. Proceedings of the 1972 Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association, Dordrecht, Reidel, pp. 7–29. (Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, Vol. 20).

    Google Scholar 

  • Misner, C. W., Thorne, K. S. and Wheeler, J. A.: 1973, Gravitation, San Francisco, Freeman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paty, M.: 1986, 'Einstein and Spinoza', in M. Grene and D. Nails (eds.), Spinoza and the Sciences, Dordrecht, Reidel, pp. 267–302.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rice, L. C.: 1975, 'Spinoza on Individuation', in M. Mandelbaum and E. Freeman (eds.), Spinoza: Essays in Interpretation, La Salle: Open Court, pp. 195–214.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheibe, E.: 1991, 'Substances, Physical Systems, and Quantum Mechanics', in G. Schurz and G. J. W. Dorn (eds.), Advances in Scientific Philosophy. Essays in Honour of Paul Weingartner, Amsterdam. Rodopi, pp. 215–229.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schrödinger, E.: 1935, 'Discussion of Probability Relations between Separated Systems', Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society 31, 555–563.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spinoza, B. de: 1925, Opera, C. Gebhardt (ed.), 1- 4, Heidelberg, Winter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stachel, J.: 1974, 'The Rise and Fall of Geometrodynamics', in K. F. Schaffner and R. S. Cohen (eds.), PSA 1972. Proceedings of the 1972 Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association, Dordrecht, Reidel, pp. 31–54. (Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, Vol. 20).

    Google Scholar 

  • Teller, P.: 1986, 'Relational Holism and Quantum Mechanics', British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 37, 71–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teller, P.: 1991, 'Substance, Relations, and Arguments about the Nature of Space-Time', Philosophical Review 100, 363–397.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Zandt, J. D.: 1986, 'Res extensa and the Space-Time Continuum', in M. Grene and D. Nails (eds.), Spinoza and the Sciences, Dordrecht, Reidel, pp. 249–266.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wheeler, J. A.: 1962a, Geometrodynamics, New York, Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wheeler, J. A.: 1962b, 'Curved Empty Space as the Building Material of the Physical World: an Assessment', in E. Nagel, P. Suppes and A. Tarski (eds.), Logic, Methodology and Philosophy of Science. Proceedings of the 1960 International Congress, Stanford, Stanford University Press, pp. 361–374.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woolhouse, R. S.: 1994, 'Descartes and the Nature of Body', British Journal for the History of Philosophy 2.1, 19–33.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Esfeld, M. Holism in Cartesianism and in Today's Philosophy of Physics. Journal for General Philosophy of Science 30, 17–36 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008326613673

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008326613673

Navigation