Abstract
By following the arguments between Coenraad J. Temminck and fellow ornithologists Louis J.-P. Vieillot and Nicholas Vigors, this paper sketches, to a degree, the state of zoological classification and nomenclature between 1825 and 1840 in Europe. The discussions revolved around the problems caused by an unstable nomenclature, the different definitions of genera and species and the best method to achieve a natural system of classification. As more and more naturalists concerned with classifying and arranging the groups of birds joined these discussions, a broad platform for debate emerged around the 1840s that gave a major impulse to the disciplines of taxonomy and systematics. Natural history ceased to be dominated by a few influential scientific authorities and became the scientific field where debate preceded agreement and, with it, progress. With this ‘democratization’ of natural history, Temminck’s status significantly changed between 1815 and 1840. After that year, his own views on classification along with certain economical and political developments in The Netherlands led Temminck to abandon the arena of ornithology and therefore, to lose his scientific authority.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Anonymous. 1820. “Nouveau Recueil de Planches Coloriéés d’Oiseaux pour servir de complement aux Planches Enluminés de Buffon. Par MM. C.J. Temminck, d’Amsterdam, et Meiffren Laugier, baron de Chartrouse, de Paris.” Annales Générales des Sciences Physiques 7: 361–371.
Anonymous. 1821. “Nouveau Recueil de Planches Coloriéés d’Oiseaux. Par MM. Temminck et Meiffren Laugier.” Annales Générales des Sciences Physiques 8: 395–396.
Anonymous, 1826. “Analytical Notices of Books. Monographies de Mammalogie, ou descriptions de quelques genres de Mammifères dont les Espèces ont été observées dans les différens Musées de l’Europe. Par C.J. Temminck, livraison, 4eme.” Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 2: 526–534.
Anonymous 1840. “Bibliographical Notices. Nouveau Recueil de Planches Coloriées d’Oiseaux… par M. Temminck et Meiffren Laugier Baron de Chartrouse, Livr. 98–102, 1839.” Annals and Magazine of Natural History 4: 266–268
Appel, T.A. 1987. The Cuvier-Geoffroy Debate. French Biology in the Decades Before Darwin. New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Bicheno, J.E. 1826. “On Systems and Methods in Natural History.” Transactions of the Linnean Society 15: 479–496.
Coleman, W. 1964. Georges Cuvier: Zoologist. A Study in the History of Evolution Theory. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Cuvier, F. 1832. “Nouveau Recueil de planches coloriées d’oiseaux… par M. Temminck, conservateur du cabinet d’histoire naturelle de Leyde, er M. Meiffren Laugier, baron de Chartrouse.” Journal des Savants, 2 Sér, n. 17: 642–651.
de la Fontaine, J. 1668. Fables. Book IV. Paris: Barbin.
Drapiez, P.A.J. 1820. “Manuel d’ornithologie, ou tableau systématique des oiseaux qui se trouvent en Europe, par C.J. Temminck, 2me édition (1).” Annales Générales des Sciences Physiques 6: 276–285.
Farber, P.L. 1976. “The Type-Concept in Zoology During the First Half of the Nineteenth Century.” Journal of the History of Biology 9(1): 93–119.
Farber, P.L. 1982. The Emergency of Ornithology as a Scientific Discipline: 1760–1850. Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publishing Company.
Farbicius, J.C. 1778. Philosophia entomologica sistens scientiae fundamenta adiectis definitionibus exemplis, observationibus, adumbrationibus. Bohnii, Hamburgi et Kilonii: E. Carol.
Gassó Miracle, M.E. 2008. “The Significance of Temminck’s Work on Biogeography: Early Nineteenth Century Natural History in Leiden, The Netherlands.” Journal of the History of Biology 41: 677–716.
Gijzen, A. 1938. ‘s Rijks Museum van Natuurlijke Historie, 1820–1915. Amsterdam: W.L. en J. Brussen.
Gray, G.R. 1840. A List of the Genera of Birds with an Indication of the Typical Species of Each Genus. London: Richard and John E. Taylor.
Gray, G.R. 1842. Appendix to a List of the Genera of Birds. London: Richard and John E. Taylor.
Gray, G.R. 1844–1849. The Genera of Birds Comprising Their Generic Characters, A Notice of the Habits of Each Genus, and an Extensive List of Species Referred to Their Several Genera. London: Longman, Brown, Green, and Longmans.
Holthuis, L.B. 1993. The Three Dutch Authors of Von Siebold’s Fauna Japonica. In Von Siebold and Natural History of Japan, Crustacea. Tokyo: The Carcinological Society of Japan, pp. 689–708.
Holthuis, L.B. 1995. 1820–1958: Rijksmuseum van Natuurlijke Historie. Leiden: Nationaal Natuurhistorisch Museum.
Horsfield, T. 1826. “Description on the Helarctos euryspilus; Exhibiting in the Bear from the Island of Borneo, by the Type of a Subgenus of Ursus.” Zoological Journal of the Linnaean Society 2: 221–234.
Illiger, J.K.W. 1811. Prodromus systematis mammalium et avium additis terminis zoographicis triusque classis, eorumque versione germanica. Berlin: C. Salfield.
Knapp, S., Lamas, G., Lughadha, N.E., and Novarino, G. 2004. “Stability or Stasis in the Names of Organisms: The Evolving Codes of Nomenclature.” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B 2004 359: 611–622.
La Vergata, A. 1987. Au nom de l’espèce. Classification et nomenclature au XIXe siègle. Scott Atran et al. (eds.), Histoire du concept d’espèce dans les sciences de la vie. Paris: Fondation Singer-Polignac.
Limoges, C. 1980. “The Development of the Muséum d’Histoire Naturelle of Paris 1800–1914.” R. Fox and G. Weisz (eds.), The Origin of Science and Technology in France, 1808–1914. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 211–240.
Linnaeus, C. 1735. Systema naturae per regna tria naturae, secundum classes, ordines, genera, species, cum characteribus, differentiis, synonymis, locis. Lugdunum Batavorum: Theodorum Haak.
Linnaeus, C. 1751. Philosophia Botanica in qua explicantur fundamenta botanica cum definitionibus partium, exemplis terminorum, observationibus rariorum, adjectis figuris æneis. Stockolmiæ: G. Kiesewetter, Amsterlodami: Z. Chatelain.
Linnaeus, C. 1753. Species Plantarum, exhibentes plantas rite cognitas, ad genera relatas, cum differentiis specificis, nominibus trivialibus, synonymis selectis, locis natalibus, secundum systema sexuale digestas. Stockholm: Holmiae.
MacLeay, W.S. 1819. Horae Entomologica, or Essays on the Annulose Animals. London: Bagster.
MacLeay, W.S. 1829. “A Letter to J.E. Bicheno, Esq., F.R.S., in Examination of His Paper on Systems and Methods.” Linnean Transactions in Philosophical Magazine Series, 2 6(33): 199–212.
McOuat, G. 1996. “Species, Rules and Meaning: The Politics of Language and the Ends of Definitions in 19th Century Natural History.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 27(4): 473–519.
McOuat, G. 2001. “Cataloguing Power: Delineating ‘Competent Naturalists’ and the meaning of Species in the British Museum.” British Journal for the History of Science 34: 1–28.
Melville, R.V. 1995. Towards Stability in the Names of Animals. A History of the International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature 1895–1995. London: International Trust for Zoological Nomenclature.
Oesher, P.H. 1948. “Louis Jean Pierre Vieillot (1748–1831).” The Auk 65: 568–576.
Saunders, H. (ed.). 1883. Vieillot’s Analyse d’une Nouvelle Ornithologie Elementaire. London: The Willughby Society.
Stamos, D.N. 2005. “Pre-Darwinian Taxonomy and Essentialism – A Reply to Mary Winsor.” Biology and Philosophy 20: 79–96.
Stresemann, E. 1975. Ornithology from Aristotle to the present. Ed. G.W. Cottrell. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA. English translation by Epstein of Stresseman’s Die Entwicklung der Ornithologie von Aristoteles bis zur Gegenwart (1951).
Strickland, H.E. 1837. “Rules for Zoological Nomenclature.” The Magazine of Natural History 1: 173–176.
Strickland, H.E. 1840. “Observations Upon the Affinities and Analogies of Organized Beings.” Annals and Magazine of Natural History 4: 219–226.
Strickland, H.E. 1841. “On the True Method of Discovering the Natural System in Zoology and Botany.” Annals and Magazine of Natural History 6: 184–194.
Strickland, H.E., et al. 1842. Report of a Committee Appointed “To Consider the Rules by Which the Nomenclature of Zoology may be Established on a Uniform and Permanent Basis”. London: John Murray for the British Association for the Advancement of Science.
Swainson, W. 1834. A Preliminary Discourse on the Study of Natural History. London: Longmans.
Swainson, W. 1835. A Treatise on the Geography and Classification of Animals. London: Longman, Rees, Orme, Brown, Green and Longman, and John Taylor.
Swainson, W. 1836. On the Natural History and Classification of Birds. Lardner’s Cabinet Cyclopedia. London: Longman, Rees, Orme, Brown, Green and Longman.
Swainson, W. 1841. “On the True Method of Discovering the Natural System in Zoology and Botany.” Annals and Magazine of Natural History 6: 184–194.
Temminck, C.J. 1813–1815. Histoire Naturelle générale des pigeons et des gallinacés. Amsterdam: J.C. Sepp et fils.
Temminck, C.J. 1815. Manuel d’ornithologie, ou tableau systématique des oiseaux qui se trouvent en Europe. Amsterdam: J.C. Sepp et fils.
Temminck, C.J. 1817. Observations sur la classification méthodique des oiseaux et remarques sur l’analyse d’une nouvelle ornithologie elémentaire par L.P. Vieillot. Amsterdam: Gabriel Doufour.
Temminck, C.J. 1820–1840. Manuel d’ornithologie, ou tableau systématique des oiseaux qui se trouvent en Europe: précédé d’une analyse du système général d’ornithologie, et suivi d’une table alphabétique des espèces. 2e éd., considérablement augmentée et mise au niveau des décourvertes nouvelles. Paris: Gabriel Dufour.
Temminck, C.J. 1832. “Monographie over een nieuw geslacht van Knaagdier, onder den naam van Nyctocleptes.” Hall, Bijdragen 7: 1–8.
Temminck, C.J. 1827–1842. Monographies de mammalogie, ou Description de quelques genres de mammifères, dont les espèces ont été observée dans les differens muséés de l’Europa. Paris: Dufour & d’Ocagne.
Temminck, C.J. 1846–1849. Coup-d’oeil général sur les possessions néerlandaises dans l’Inde Archipélagique. 3 Vols. Leiden: Arnz.
Theunissen, B. 2000. ‘Nut en nog eens nut’: wetenschapsbeelden van Nederlandse natuuronderzoekers, 1800–1900. Hilversum: Verloren.
van Berkel, K., van Helden, A. and Palm, L. (eds.). 1999. A History of Science in the Netherlands. Survey, Themes and Reference. Leiden: Brill.
Veth, H.J. 1879. Overzicht van hetgeen, in het bijzonder door Nederland, gedaan is voor de kennis der fauna van Nederlandsch Indië. Leiden: Van Doesburgh.
Vieillot, L.P. 1816. Analyse d’une nouvelle ornithologie élémentaire. Paris: Deterville.
Vieillot, L.P. 1818. “Ornithologie.” In: Nouveau dictionnaire d’histoire naturelle, appliquée aux arts, à l’agriculture, à l’économie rurale et domestique, à la médecine, etc. Par une société de naturalistes et d’agriculteurs (1816–1819). Vol. 24. Paris: Deterville, pp. 68–144.
Vigors, N.A. 1824. “Some Observations on the Nomenclature of Ornithology; Particularly with Reference to the Admission of New Genera.” The Zoological Journal 1(2): 180–200.
Vigors, N.A. 1825. “Observations on the Natural Affinities that Connect the Orders and Families of Birds.” Transactions of the Linnean Society of London 14: 395–517.
Wallace, A.R. 1856. “Attempts at a Natural Classification of Birds.” The Annals and Magazine of Natural History 18: 193–216.
Wildenow, C.L. 1792. Grundriss der Kräuterkunde zu Vorlesungen. zu Vorlesungen entworfen. Berlin: Haude und Spener.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Eulàlia Gassó Miracle, M. On Whose Authority? Temminck’s Debates on Zoological Classification and Nomenclature: 1820–1850. J Hist Biol 44, 445–481 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10739-010-9265-1
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10739-010-9265-1