Abstract
In recent years a number of authors sympathetic to Referentialistaccounts of proper names have argued that utterances containingempty names express `gappy,' or incomplete, propositions. In this paper I want to take issue with this suggestion.In particular, I argue versions of this approach developedby David Braun, Nathan Salmon, Ken Taylor, and by Fred Adams,Gary Fuller, and Robert Stecker.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Adams, F., Fuller, G. and Stecker, R. (1992): $#x2018;The Semantics of Thought$#x2019;, Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 73, 375–389.
Adams, F., Fuller, G. and Stecker, R. (1997): $#x2018;The Semantics of Fictional Names$#x2019;, Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 78, 128–148.
Adams, F. and Stecker, R. (1994): $#x2018;Vacuous Singular Terms$#x2019;,Mind and Language 9, 387–401.
Almog, J. (1991): $#x2018;The Subject-Predicate Class I, Nous 25, 591–619.
Bezuidenhout,A. (1997): $#x2018;The Communication of de re Thoughts$#x2019;,Nous 31, 197–225.
Braun, D. (1991): $#x2018;Proper Names, Cognitive Contents, and Beliefs$#x2019;, Philosophical Studies 62, 289–305.
Braun, D. (1993): $#x2018;Empty Names$#x2019;, Nous 27, 449–469.
Braun, D. (1998): $#x2018;Understanding Belief Reports$#x2019;, Philosophical Review 107, 555–595.
Crimmins, M. (1992): Talk About Beliefs, Cambridge: MIT Press.
Devitt, M. (1989): $#x2018;Against Direct Reference$#x2019;, in P. French, T. Uehling and H. Wettstein (eds.), Midwest Studies in Philosophy, vol. XIV, Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press, pp. 206–240.
Donnellan, K. (1974): $#x2018;Speaking of Nothing$#x2019;, Philosophical Review 83, 3–31.
Everett, A. (2000): $#x2018;Referentialism and Empty Names$#x2019;, in A. Everett and T. Hofweber (eds.), Empty Names, Fiction, and the Puzzles of Non-Existence, Stanford: CSLI Press.
Friend, S. (2000): $#x2018;Review of Thomasson$#x2019;, Mind 109, 997–1000.
Green, M. (1998): $#x2018;Direct Reference and Implicature$#x2019;, Philosophical Studies 91, 61–90.
Heck, R. (1995): $#x2018;The Sense of Communication$#x2019;, Mind 104, 79–106.
Kaplan, D. (1989): $#x2018;Demonstratives$#x2019;, in J. Almog, H. Wettstein and J. Perry (eds.), Themes for Kaplan, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 565–614.
Predelli, S. (1999): $#x2018;Saul, Salmon, and Superman$#x2019;, Analysis 59, 113–116.
Richard, M. (1990): Propositional Attitudes, New York: Cambridge University Press.
Richard, M. (1997): $#x2018;Propositional Attitudes$#x2019;, in B. Hale and C. Wright (eds.), Blakcwell Companion to the Philsophy of Language, Oxford: Blakcwell, pp. 197–226.
Russell, B. (1903): Principles of Mathematics, London: Norton.
Salmon, N. (1986): Frege's Puzzle, Cambridge: MIT Press.
Salmon, N. (1998): $#x2018;Nonexistence$#x2019;, Nous 32, 277–319.
Soames, S. (1985): $#x2018;Lost Innocence$#x2019;, Linguistics and Philosophy 8, 59–71.
Soames, S. (1987): $#x2018;Direct Reference, Propositional Attitudes, and Semantic Content$#x2019;, Philosophical Topics 15, 47–87.
Soames, S. (1998): $#x2018;The Modal Argument: Wide Scope and Rigidified Descriptions$#x2019;, Nous32, 1–22.
Soames, S. (2001): Beyond Rigidity, Oxford: OUP.
Taylor, K. (2000): $#x2018;Emptiness without Compromise$#x2019;, in A. Everett and T. Hofweber (eds.), Empty Names, Fiction, and the Puzzles of Non-Existence, Stanford: CSLI Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Everett, A. Empty Names and `Gappy' Propositions. Philosophical Studies 116, 1–36 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:PHIL.0000005533.25543.36
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:PHIL.0000005533.25543.36