Skip to main content
Log in

Factors that Influence the Moral Reasoning Abilities of Accountants: Implications for Universities and the Profession

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The need to maintain the public trust in the integrity of the accounting profession has led to increased interest in research that examines the moral reasoning abilities (MRA) of Certified Public Accountants (CPAs). This study examines the MRA of CPAs practicing in small firms or as sole practitioners and the factors that affect MRA throughout their working careers.

The results indicate that small-firm accounting practitioners exhibit lower MRA than expected for professionals and that age, gender and socio-political beliefs affect the moral reasoning abilities of small-firm practitioners. We also find that completion of an ethics course in college has a positive impact on MRA. Also, the survey respondents indicate overwhelming support for including ethics courses within the business curriculum. Finally, the fact that those accountants with the lowest MRA are the least supportive of ethical training may indicate the need for mandatory, rather than optional, training in ethics both in university and Continuing Professional Education courses.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Accounting Education Change Commission: 1990, ‘Objectives of Education for Accountants: AECC Position Statement Number One’, Issues in Accounting Education (Fall), 307–312.

  • Armstrong, M.: 1987, ‘Moral Development and Accounting Education’, Journal of Accounting Education (Spring), 27–43.

  • Armstrong, M.: 1993, ‘Ethics and Professionalism in Accounting Education: A Sample Course’, Journal of Accounting Education (Spring), 77–92.

  • Collins, A. and N. Schultz: 1995, ‘A Critical Examination of the AICPA Code of Professional Conduct’, Journal of Business Ethics 14(1), 31–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Etherington, L. and N. Hill: 1997, ‘Ethical Development of CMAs: A Focus on Non-Public Accountants in the United States’, Research on Accounting Ethics (forthcoming).

  • Etherington, L. and L. Schulting: 1995, ‘Ethical Development of Accountants: The Case of Canadian CMAs’, Research on Accounting Ethics 1, 237–253.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eynon, G., N. Hill, K. Stevens and P. Clark: 1996, ‘An International Comparison of Accounting Students from Ireland and the United States’, Journal of Accounting Education 14(4), 477–492.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Finn, D., L. Chonko and S. Hunt: 1988, ‘Ethical Problems in Public Accounting: The View from the Top’, Journal of Business Ethics 7, 605–615.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fogarty, T.: 1995, ‘Accountant Ethics: A Brief Examination of Neglected Sociological Dimensions’, Journal of Business Ethics 14(2), 103–115.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hiltebeitel, K. and S. Jones: 1992, ‘Initial Evidence on the Impact of Integrating Ethics into Accounting Education’, Issues in Accounting Education 6(2), 262–275.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman, W. and E. Petry: 1991, ‘Business Ethics at Bentley College’, Moral Education Forum 16(3), 1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, S. and K. Hiltebeitel: 1995, ‘Organizational Influence in a Model of the Moral Decision Process of Accountants’, Journal of Business Ethics 14, 417–431.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohlberg, L.: 1976, ‘Moral Stages and Moralization: The Cognitive Developmental Approach to Socialization’, in D. Goslin (ed.), Handbook of Socialization Theory and Research (Rand McNally, Chicago), pp. 347–480.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Commission on Fraudulent Financial Reporting (The Treadway Commission): 1987, Report on the National Commission on Fraudulent Financial Reporting (October).

  • Ponemon, L.: 1992, ‘Ethical Reasoning and Selection-Socialization in Accounting’, Accounting, Organizations, and Society 17, 239–258.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ponemon, L.: 1993, ‘Can Ethics be Taught in Accounting?’, Journal of Accounting Education 11, 185–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ponemon, L. and D. Gabhart: 1993, Ethical Reasoning in Accounting and Auditing. Research Monograph Number 21 (Vancouver, BC: CGA Canada Research Foundation).

    Google Scholar 

  • Randall, D.: 1994, ‘Why Students Take Elective Business Ethics Courses: Applying the Theory of Planned Behavior’, Journal of Business Ethics 13, 369–378.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rest, J.: 1979, Development in Judging Moral Issues (Minneapolis, MN: University of Minneapolis Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rest, J.: 1986, Moral Development: Advances in Theory and Research (Praeger, New York, NY).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rest, J.: 1990, DIT Manual (Minneapolis, MN: University of Minneapolis Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaub, M.: 1994, ‘An Analysis of the Association of Traditional Demographic Variables with the Moral Reasoning of Auditing Students and Auditors’, Journal of Accounting Education (Winter), 1–26.

  • Siegel, G. and Sorensen, J.: 1994, ‘What Corporate America Wants in Entry-level Accountants’, Management Accounting (September), 26–31.

  • St. Pierre, K., E. Nelson and A. Gabbin: 1990, ‘A Study of the Ethical Development of Accounting Majors in Relation to Other Business and Nonbusiness Disciplines’, The Accounting Educators Journal (Spring), 23–35.

  • Ward, S., D. Ward and A. Deck: 1993, ‘Certified Public Accountants: Ethical Perception Skills and Attitudes on Ethics Education’, Journal of Business Ethics 12, 601–610.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, J.: 1990, ‘Measuring the Impact of Teaching Ethics to Future Managers: A Review, Assessment, and Recommendation’, Journal of Business Ethics 9, 183–190.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weinreich-Haste, H.: 1986, ‘Kohlberg's Contribution to Political Psychology: A Positive View’, in S. Modgil and C. Modgil (eds.), Lawrence Kohlberg: Consensus and Controversy (The Falmer Press, Philadelphia), pp. 337–361.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Eynon, G., Hills, N.T. & Stevens, K.T. Factors that Influence the Moral Reasoning Abilities of Accountants: Implications for Universities and the Profession. Journal of Business Ethics 16, 1297–1309 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005754201952

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005754201952

Keywords

Navigation