Skip to main content
Log in

Competition and predation models applied to the case of the sibling birds species ofHippolais in Burgundy

  • Published:
Acta Biotheoretica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We study the case of two sibling species ofHippolais(Aves). Very little differences can be observed in the morphology of both species. The breeding area of these species are complementary. Roughly, one species breeds North and East of Europe (Hippolais icterina) while the other breeds South and West of Europe (Hippolais polyglotta). There exitst a narrow zone of sympatry passing through Burgundy. Since several years, it has been observed that this area of sympatry was moving in the North-East direction at a European scale. This means that progressivelyH. icterina is declining and is replaced byH. polyglotta. Some assumptions can be made in order to explain this evolution, for instance competition or predation. Series of observations concerning the diets of nestlings of both species have been realized. These observations show some differences in the diet compositions. The breeding success of the two species has been studied. Numerical simulations of a competition model taking into account the observed differences between the food types eaten by the two species are presented. These simulations do not explain the regression ofH. icterina. Then, we present numerical simulations of a predation model with one predator attacking the nestlings of both species. These simulations show that with time one of the two preys must extinct. Predation rather than competition seems to be the right explanation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Auger, P. (1989). Dynamics and Thermodynamics in Hierarchically Organized Systems. Applications in Physics, Biology and Economics. Oxford, Pergamon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blondel, J. (1986). Biogeographie Évolutive. Paris, Masson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cody, M.L. (1969). Convergence characteristics in sympatric species: a possible relation to interspecific competition and aggression. The Condor 71: 222–239.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cody, M.L. (1974). Competition and the structure of bird communities. Princeton, Princeton university press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diamond, J.M. (1975). Assembly of species communities. In: M.L. Cody and J.M. Diamond, eds., Ecology and Evolution of Communities, 342–444. Cambridge MA, Cambridge university press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diamond, J.M. (1978). Niche shifts and the rediscovery of interspecific competition. Am. Sci. 66: 322–331.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elton, C.S. (1927). Animal Ecology. London, Sidgwick and Jackson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Faivre, B. et C. Ferry (1989). La regression du Grand Contrefaisant (Hippolais icterina) en Bourgogne. Aves (actes du tième colloque international d'ornithologie, Liège 1988): 153–166.

  • Ferry, C. (1962). La zone de contact des deux Contrefaisants en Côte d'Or. Le Jean le Blanc 1: 47–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferry, C. (1975). Des Fauvettes bilingues. La Recherche 58: 486–487.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferry, C. (1980). Oiseaux (le chant des). Problèmes de compréhension entre les espèces. Encyclopedia Universalis, thèmes et problèmes: 323–326.

  • Henry, C. (1979). Ecologie d'une communauté de Passereaux paludicoles. Thèse de doctorat. Université d'Orléans.

  • Hespenheide, H.A. (1971). Food preference and the extent of overlap in some insectivorous birds, with special reference to the Tyrannidae. Ibis 113: 59–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutchinson, G.E. (1957). Concluding remarks. Cold Spring Harbor Symposium Quant. Biol. 22: 415–427.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutchinson, G.E. (1959). Homage to Santa Rosalia or why are there so many kinds of animals? The American Naturalist 93: 145–159.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kendeigh, S.G. (1961). Animal Ecology. Englewood Cliffs NJ, Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lack D. (1971). Ecological Isolation in Birds. Blackwell Scientific Publ. Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacArthur, R.H. (1968). The theory of the niche. In: R.C. Lewontin, ed., Population Biology and Evolution, 159–17. Syracuse, Syracuse university press.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacArthur, R.H. (1972). Geographical Ecology. New York, Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacArthur, R.H. and R. Levins (1967). The limiting similarity, convergence, and divergence of coexisting species. The american naturalist 101: 377–385.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayr, E. (1974). Populations, Espèces et Évolution. Paris, Hermann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayfield, M.F. (1975). Suggestions for calculating nest success. Wilson Bulletin 87: 456–466.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murray, B.G. (1971). The ecological consequences of interspecific territorial behaviour in birds. Ecology 52: 414–423.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roughgarden, J. (1979). Theory of Population Genetics and Evolutionary Ecology: an Introduction. New York, MacMillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simberloff, D. (1982). The status of competition theory in ecology. Ann. Zool. Fennici 19: 241–253.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiens, J.A. (1977). On competition and variable environments. Am. Sci. 65: 590–597.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Faivre, B., Auger, P.M. Competition and predation models applied to the case of the sibling birds species ofHippolais in Burgundy. Acta Biotheor 41, 23–33 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00712771

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00712771

Keywords

Navigation