Abstract
Depending on different positions in the debate on scientific realism, there are various accounts of the phenomena of physics. For scientific realists like Bogen and Woodward, phenomena are matters of fact in nature, i.e., the effects explained and predicted by physical theories. For empiricists like van Fraassen, the phenomena of physics are the appearances observed or perceived by sensory experience. Constructivists, however, regard the phenomena of physics as artificial structures generated by experimental and mathematical methods. My paper investigates the historical background of these different meanings of “phenomenon” in the traditions of physics and philosophy. In particular, I discuss Newton’s account of the phenomena and Bohr’s view of quantum phenomena, their relation to the philosophical discussion, and to data and evidence in current particle physics and quantum optics.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bailer-Jones, D. M. (2009). Scientific models in philosophy of science. University of Pittsburgh Press (to appear).
Bogen J., Woodward J. (1988) Saving the phenomena. The Philosophical Review 97: 303–352
Bohr, N. (1922). On atomerne bygning. Nobel lecture, December 11, 1922. German translation by Pauli, W. (1923). Über den Bau der Atome. Naturwissenschaften, 11, 606–624. English translation by Hoyt, F. C. (1923). The structure of the atom. Nature, 112, 29–44. Danish and English text in BCW (Bohr’s Collected Works), Vol. 4, pp. 425–482.
Bohr, N. (1927). The quantum postulate and the recent development of atomic theory. Como lecture. Modified version: Bohr, 1928. Both versions in BCW, Vol. 6, pp. 109–158.
Bohr, N. (1928). The quantum postulate and the recent development of atomic theory. Nature, 121, 580–590 (modified version). Reprinted in Wheeler, J. A., & Zurek, W. H. (Eds.). (1983). Quantum theory and measurement (pp. 87–126). Princeton: Princeton University Press. (Quoted after Wheeler and Zurek 1983).
Bohr, N. (1933). Light and life. Nature, 131, 421–423, 457–459. Reprinted in Bohr, N. (1958). Atomic physics and human knowledge. New York: Wiley. Also in BCW, Vol. 10.
Bohr, N. (1949). Discussion with Einstein on epistemological problems of atomic physics. In P. A. Schilpp (Ed.), Albert Einstein: Philosopher—scientist (pp. 115–150). Illinois, Evanston: Library of Living Philosophers. Reprinted in Wheeler, J. A., & Zurek, W. H. (Eds.). (1983). Quantum theory and measurement (pp. 9–49). Princeton: Princeton University Press. (Quoted after Wheeler and Zurek 1983).
Bohr N. (1958) Atomic physics and human knowledge. Wiley, New York
Bohr, N. (1961). Physique atomique et connaissance humaine (C. Chevalley, Ed.). Paris: Gallimard.
Cartwright N. (1983) How the laws of physics lie. Clarendon Press, Oxford
Cartwright N. (1999) The dappled world: A study of the boundaries of science. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Chevalley, C. (1991). Glossaire, in Bohr 1961, pp. 345–567.
Cohen H. (1883) Das Prinzip der Infinitesimalmethode und seine Geschichte Ein Kapitel zur Grundlegung der Erkenntniskritik. Duemmler, Berlin
Cohen, H. (1896). Einleitung mit kritischem Nachtrag zur 9.\ Auflage der Geschichte des Materialismus von Friedrich Albert Lange. Reprinted in Werke, Vol. 5.2. Hildesheim: Olms (1977 ff.).
Compton, A. H. (1927). Compton scattering. Picture taken from: Grimsehls Lehrbuch der Physik. Neu bearbeitet von R.Tomaschek. Zweiter Band, Zweiter Teil: Materie und Äther (8th ed., pp. 138, 211). Leipzig und Berlin: Teubner.
Engfer, H. J. (1982). Philosophie als Analysis. Studien zur Entwicklung philosophischer Analysis-Konzeptionen unter dem Einfluß mathematischer Methodenideale im 17. und frühen 18. Jahrhundert. Stuttgart-Bad Cannstatt: Fromann-Holzboog.
Falkenburg, B. (2000). Kants Kosmologie. Die wissenschaftliche Revolution der Kosmologie im 18. Jahrhundert. Frankfurt/M.: Klostermann.
Falkenburg B. (2007) Particle metaphysics: A critical account of subatomic reality. Springer, Berlin
Falkenburg, B., & Ihmig, K.-N. (2004). Report DFG Fa 261/5-1, Hypotheses non fingo: Newtons Methodenlehre. Dortmund (unpublished).
Faye J. (1991) Niels Bohr: His heritage and legacy. Kluwer, Dordrecht
Hacking I. (1983) Representing and intervening. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Ihmig K.-N. (2004a) Die Bedeutung der Methoden der Analyse und Synthese für Newtons Programm der Mathematisierung der Natur. In: Meixner U., Newen A. (eds) Logical analysis and history of philosophy 7, focus: History of the philosophy of nature. Paderborn, Mentis, pp 91–119
Ihmig K.-N. (2004b) Newtons’s program of mathematizing nature. In: Hoffmann M., Lenhard J., Seeger F. (eds) Activity and sign—grounding mathematics education. Festschrift für Michael Otte. Kluwer, Dordrecht
Knorr-Cetina K. D. (1999) Epistemic cultures: How the sciences make knowledge. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass.
Lambert, J. H. (1764). Neues Organon oder Gedanken über die Erforschung des Wahren und dessen Unterscheidung von Irrtum und Schein. Leipzig: Johann Wendler; Nachdruck: Berlin, Akademie-Verlag (1990).
Latour, B., & Woolgar, St. (1979). Laboratory life. The construction of scientific facts. Beverly Hills, London: Sage Publications, (2nd ed.): Princeton University Press.
Losee J. (1993) A historical introduction to the philosophy of science. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Mach, E. (1905). Erkenntnis und Irrtum. Skizzen zur Psychologie der Forschung. Reprint of 5th ed: Leipzig (1926); Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft (1991).
Meyer-Abich K. M. (1965) Korrespondenz, Individualität und Komplementarität. Steiner, Wiesbaden
Mill, J. St. (1843). A system of logic. Abridged version based on the 8th ed. (New York 1881). Reprint: John Stuart Mill’s philosophy of scientific method (E. Nagel, Ed.). New York: Hafner Publishing Co. (1950).
Morgan M., Morrison M. (eds). (1999). Models as mediators: Perspectives on natural and social sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Natorp P. (1910) Die logischen Grundlagen der exakten Wissenschaften. Teubner, Leipzig und Berlin
Newton, I. (1729). Principia. Sir Isaac Newton’s mathematical principles of natural philosophy and his system of the world. Vol. I: The motion of bodies. Vol. II: The system of the world. Mott’s translation revised by Cajori. Berkeley: Univiversity of California Press (1934, 1962).
Newton, I. (1730). Opticks or treatise of the reflections, refractions, inflections & colours of light. Based on the fourth edition: London (1730); New York: Dover (1952, 1979).
Newton, I. (1999). The principia. Mathematical principles of natural philosophy (I. Bernhard Cohen & Anne Whitman, Trans.). Berkeley: University of California Press.
Pickering A. (1984) Constructing quarks. Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh
Powell C. F., Fowler P. H., Perkins D. H. (1959) The study of elementary particles by the photographic method: An account of the principal techniques and discoveries illustrated by an atlas of photomicrographs. Pergamon Press, London
Pringe H. (2007) Critique of the quantum power of judgment. Walter de Gruyter, Berlin
Raether, H. (1957). Elektronenfrequenzen. Handbuch der Physik, Bd. 32, 443.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Falkenburg, B. What are the phenomena of physics?. Synthese 182, 149–163 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-009-9617-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-009-9617-6