Skip to main content
Log in

Time, tense, truth

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Synthese Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A theory of time is a theory of the nature of temporal reality, and temporal reality determines the truth-value of temporal sentences. Therefore it is reasonable to ask how a theory of time can account for the way the truth of temporal sentences is determined. This poses certain challenges for both the A theory and the B theory of time. In this paper, I outline an account of temporal sentences. The key feature of the account is that the primary bearers of truth-values are not utterances, but sentences evaluated with respect to a time. I argue that unlike other views, the present proposal can meet the challenges faced both by the A and the B theory.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Craig W.L. (1996). The B-theory’s Tu Quoque argument. Synthese, 107, 249–269

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Craig W.L. (1999). On truth-conditions of tensed sentence types. Synthese, 120, 265–270

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dyke H. (2002). Tokens, dates and tenseless truth-conditions. Synthese, 131, 329–351

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farkas, K. forthcoming. Semantic internalism and externalism. In E. Lepore, & B. C. Smith (Eds.), Oxford handbook of philosophy of language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Faye J. (2003). The metaphysics of time. In: Jokic A., Smith Q. (eds) Time, tense and reference. Cambridge, Mass., MIT Press, pp. 253–267

    Google Scholar 

  • Frege, G. (1918). The thought. In S. Blackburn, & K. Simmons (Eds.), Truth (pp. 85–105). Oxford University Press (Reprinted 1999).

  • Le Poidevin R. (2003). ‘Why tenses need real times’. In: Jokic A., Smith Q. (eds) Time, tense and reference. Cambridge, Mass., MIT Press, pp. 305–324

    Google Scholar 

  • Lowe E.J. (1987). The indexical fallacy in McTaggart’s proof of the unreality of time. Mind, 96, 62–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McTaggart, J. M. E (1927). Time (selections from chapter 33 of The Nature of Existence). In T. Crane, & K. Farkas (Eds.), Metaphysics: A guide and anthology (pp. 454–463). Oxford University Press (Reprinted 2004).

  • Mellor D.H. (1981). Real time. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Mellor D.H. (1998). Real time II. London, Routledge

    Google Scholar 

  • Oaklander, L. Nathan: 1994, A defense of the new tenseless theory of time. In L. N. Oaklander, & Q. Smith (Eds.), The new theory of time (pp. 57–68). New Haven: Yale University Press.

  • Paul L. (1997). Truth conditions of tensed sentence types. Synthese, 111, 53–72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perry J. (1979). The problem of the essential indexical. Noûs, 13, 3–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prior A.N. (1968). Papers on time and tense. Oxford, Clarendon Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith Q. (1993). Language and time. New York, Oxford University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith Q. (1994a). Problems with the new tenseless theories of time. In: Oaklander N., Smith Q. (eds) The new theory of time. New Haven, Yale University Press, pp. 38–56

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith Q. (1994b). The truth conditions of tensed sentences. In: Oaklander L.N., Smith Q. (eds) The new theory of time. New Haven, Yale University Press, pp. 69–76

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith Q. (1999). The sentence-type version of the tenseless theory of time. Synthese, 119, 233–251

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Katalin Farkas.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Farkas, K. Time, tense, truth. Synthese 160, 269–284 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-006-9116-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-006-9116-y

Keywords

Navigation