Complexity and deliberative democracy

36Citations
Citations of this article
19Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Communism may be dead, but a quasi-Marxist critique of liberal democracy survives in the writings of a number of thinkers - most notably, David Miller and John Dryzek - who deplore the self-centered apathy of their fellow citizens and defend the radical ideal of deliberative democracy. Inspired mainly by Rousseau and Habermas, this emergent school of thought argues for a more participatory system where the public interest takes precedence over private interest, and where rational argument replaces cynical manipulation. The paper questions whether the deliberative model can cope with the incalculable complexity of modern society. Deliberative democracy, it is contended, rests on doubtful metaphysical assumptions, a blinkered approach to empirical evidence, and a common misapprehension about the nature of political argument. © 1996 Taylor & Francis Group, LLC.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Femia, J. (1996). Complexity and deliberative democracy. Inquiry (United Kingdom), 39(3–4), 359–397. https://doi.org/10.1080/00201749608602427

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free