Skip to main content
Log in

Is nonstandard analysis relevant for the philosophy of mathematics?

  • Published:
Synthese Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. S. Albeverio, J. E. Fenstad, R. Høegh-Krohn, T. Lindstrøm: 1985, Nonstandard Methods in Stochastic Analysis and Mathematical Physics, Academic Press, New York, 275–95.

    Google Scholar 

  2. J. E. Fenstad: 1980, Nonstandard Methods in Stochastic Analysis and Mathematical Physics, Jber. D. Math. Verein 82, 167–80.

    Google Scholar 

  3. J. E. Fenstad, A. Nyberg: 1971, Standard and Nonstandard Methods in Uniform Topology, in Logic Colloquium '69, North-Holland, 353–59.

  4. H. Hahn: The Crisis in Intuition, reprinted in [6], 1956–76.

  5. L. Helms, P. Loeb: 1979, Applications of Nonstandard Analysis to Spin Models, J. Math. Anal. Appl. 69, 341–52.

    Google Scholar 

  6. J. Newman: 1956, The World of Mathematics, Simon and Schuster, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  7. K. Popper: 1972, Objective Knowledge, The Clarendon Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  8. A. Robinson: 1966, Nonstandard Analysis, North-Holland.

  9. L. White: The Locus of Mathematical Reality: An Anthropological Footnote, reprinted in [6], 2348–64.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fenstad, J.E. Is nonstandard analysis relevant for the philosophy of mathematics?. Synthese 62, 289–301 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00486052

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00486052

Keywords

Navigation