Skip to main content
Log in

On the Modal Definability of Simulability by Finite Transitive Models

  • Published:
Studia Logica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We show that given a finite, transitive and reflexive Kripke model 〈 W, ≼, ⟦ ⋅ ⟧ 〉 and \({w \in W}\) , the property of being simulated by w (i.e., lying on the image of a literalpreserving relation satisfying the ‘forth’ condition of bisimulation) is modally undefinable within the class of S4 Kripke models. Note the contrast to the fact that lying in the image of w under a bisimulation is definable in the standard modal language even over the class of K4 models, a fairly standard result for which we also provide a proof.

We then propose a minor extension of the language adding a sequent operator \({\natural}\) (‘tangle’) which can be interpreted over Kripke models as well as over topological spaces. Over finite Kripke models it indicates the existence of clusters satisfying a specified set of formulas, very similar to an operator introduced by Dawar and Otto. In the extended language \({{\sf L}^+ = {\sf L}^{\square\natural}}\) , being simulated by a point on a finite transitive Kripke model becomes definable, both over the class of (arbitrary) Kripke models and over the class of topological S4 models.

As a consequence of this we obtain the result that any class of finite, transitive models over finitely many propositional variables which is closed under simulability is also definable in L +, as well as Boolean combinations of these classes. From this it follows that the μ-calculus interpreted over any such class of models is decidable.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Aiello, M., and J. van Benthem, ‘Logical patterns in space’, in University of Amsterdam, 1999, pp. 5–25.

  2. Aleksandroff P.: ‘Diskrete räume’. Matematicheskii Sbornik 2, 501–518 (1937)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Andréka H., Van Benthem J., Németi I.: ‘Modal languages and bounded fragments of predicate logic’. Journal of Philosophical Logic 27(3), 217–274 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Barwise J., Moss L.S.: ‘Modal correspondence for models’. Journal of Philosophical Logic 27, 275–294 (1998) 10.1023/A:1004268613379

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Blackburn, P., M. de Rijke, and Y. Venema, Modal logic, 2001.

  6. Comfort W.W.: ‘Ultrafilters: Some old and some new results’. Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. 83, 417–455 (1977)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Dawar A., Otto M.: ‘Modal characterisation theorems over special classes of frames’. Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 161, 1–42 (2009) Extended journal version LICS 2005 paper

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Fernández-Duque D.: ‘Non-deterministic semantics for dynamic topological logic’. Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 157(2-3), 110–121 (2009) Kurt Gödel Centenary Research Prize Fellowships

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Gabelaia D., Kurucz A., Wolter F., Zakharyaschev M.: ‘Non-primitive recursive decidability of products of modal logics with expanding domains’. Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 142(1-3), 245–268 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Kozen D.: ‘Results on the propositional μ-calculus’. Theor. Comput. Sci. 27, 333–354 (1983)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Kozen D.: ‘A finite model theorem for the propositional μ-calculus’. Studia Logica 47(3), 233–241 (1988)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Kruskal J.B.: ‘Well-quasi-ordering, the tree theorem, and vazsonyi’s conjecture’. Transactions of the American Mathematical Society 95(2), 210–225 (1960)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Streett, R. S., and E. A. Emerson, ‘The propositional μ-calculus is elementary’, in Automata, Languages and Programming, volume 172 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Springer, Berlin / Heidelberg, 1984, pp. 465–472.

  14. van Benthem, J., ‘Dynamic odds and ends’, ILLC Technical Report ML, 1998.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David Fernández Duque.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fernández Duque, D. On the Modal Definability of Simulability by Finite Transitive Models. Stud Logica 98, 347–373 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11225-011-9339-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11225-011-9339-x

Keywords

Navigation