Skip to main content
Log in

A measure for the distance between an interval hypothesis and the truth

  • Causation And Scientific Inference And Related Matters
  • Published:
Synthese Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The problem of distance from the truth, and more generally distance between hypotheses, is considered here with respect to the case of quantitative hypotheses concerning the value of a given scientific quantity.

Our main goal consists in the explication of the concept of distance D(I, θ) between an interval hypothesis I and a point hypothesis θ. In particular, we attempt to give an axiomatic foundation of this notion on the basis of a small number of adequacy conditions.

Moreover, the distance function introduced here is employed for the reformulation of the approach to scientific inference — developed by Hintikka, Levi and other scholars — labelled “cognitive decision theory”. In this connection, we supply a concrete illustration of the rules for inductive acceptance of interval hypotheses that can be obtained on the basis of D(I, θ).

Lastly, our approach is compared with other proposals made in literature about verisimilitude and distance from the truth.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aitchison, J. and I. R. Dunsmore: 1968, ‘Linear-Loss Interval Estimation of Location and Scale Parameters’, Biometrika 55, 141–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aitchison, J. and I. R. Dunsmore: 1975, Statistical Prediction Analysis, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andersson, G.: 1978, ‘The Problem of Verisimilitude’ in G. Radnitzky and G. Andersson (eds.), Progress and Rationality in Science, Reidel, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carnap, R.: 1950, Logical Foundations of Probability, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carnap, R.: 1966, ‘Probability and Content Measure’, in P. K. Feyerabend and G. Maxwell (eds.), Mind, Matter and Method, University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carnap, R.: 1980, ‘A Basic System of Inductive Logic. Part II’, in R. Jeffrey (ed.), Studies in Inductive Logic and Probability, Vol. II, University of California Press, Berkeley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferguson, T. S.: 1967, Mathematical Statistics: A Decision- Theoretic Approach, Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hempel, C. G.: 1960, ‘Inductive Inconsistencies’, Synthese 12, 439–69, reprinted in C. G. Hempel, Aspects of Scientific Explanation, The Free Press, New York, 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hilpinen, R.: 1968, Rules of Acceptance and Inductive Logic (Acta Philosophica Fennica 21), North-Holland, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hilpinen, R.: 1972, ‘Decision-Theoretic Approaches to Rules of Acceptance’, in R. E. Olson and A. M. Paul (eds.), Contemporary Philosophy in Scandinavia, The Johns Hopkins Press, Baltimore and London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hintikka, J.: 1968, ‘The Varieties of Information and Scientific Explanation’ in B. van Rootselaar and J. F. Staal (eds.), Logic, Methodology and Philosophy of Science, North-Holland, Amsterdam. pp. 311–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuipers, T. K.: 1978, Studies in Inductive Probability and Rational Expectation, Reidel, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levi, I.: 1967a, Gambling with Truth, Alfred A. Knopf, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levi, I.: 1967b, ‘Information and Inference’, Synthese 17, 369–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, D.: 1975, ‘The Accuracy of Predictions’, Synthese 30, 159–91, 207–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, D.: 1976, ‘Verisimilitude Redeflated’, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 27, 363–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, D.: 1978a, ‘On Distance from the Truth as a True Distance’, in J. Hintikka, I. Niiniluoto, and E. Saarinen (eds.), Essays on Mathematical and Philosophical Logic, Reidel, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, D.: 1978b, ‘The Distance between Constituents’, Synthese 38, 197–212.

    Google Scholar 

  • Niiniluoto, I.: 1977, ‘On a K-dimensional System of Inductive Logic’ in F. Suppe and P. Asquith (eds.), PSA 1976, Philosophy of Science Association, East Lansing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Niiniluoto, I.: 1978a, ‘Truthlikeness in First-Order Languages’, in J. Hintikka, I. Niiniluoto, and E. Saarinen (eds.), Essays on Mathematical and Philosophical Logic, Reidel, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Niiniluoto, I.: 1978b, ‘Truthlikeness: Comments on Recent Discussion’, Synthese 38, 281–329.

    Google Scholar 

  • Niiniluoto, I.: 1980, ‘Scientific Progress’, Synthese 45, 427–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Niiniluoto, I.: 1982, ‘Truthlikeness for Quantitative Statements’ in P. D. Asquith and T. Nickles (eds.) PSA 1982, Vol. I, Philosophy of Science Association, East Lansing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Niiniluoto, I.: 1985, ‘Theories, Approximations, and Idealizations’, in Logic, Methodology, and Philosophy of Science VII, North-Holland, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oddie, G.: 1978, ‘Verisimilitude as Distance in Logical Space’, in I. Niiniluoto and R. Tuomela (eds.) The Logic and Epistemology of Scientific Change (Acta Philosophica Fennica 30), North-Holland, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popper, K. R.: 1963, Conjectures and Refutations: The Growth of Scientific Knowledge, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popper, K. R.: 1972, Objective Knowledge, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popper, K. R.: 1976, ‘A Note on Verisimilitude’, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 27, 147–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenkrantz, R. D.: 1980, ‘Measuring Truthlikeness’, Synthese 45, 463–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tichý, P.: 1976, ‘Verisimilitude Redefined’, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 25, 25–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tichý, P.: 1978, ‘Verisimilitude Revisited’, Synthese 38, 175–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tuomela, R.: 1978, ‘Verisimilitude and Theory-Distance’, Synthese 38, 213–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wald, A.: 1950, Statistical Decision Functions, John Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zellner, A.: 1971, An Introduction to Bayesian Inference in Econometrics, John Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

I am grateful for the possibility of spending a period of some months at the Department of Philosophy of University of Gröningen. I profited there a lot from the supervision by Dr. Theo Kuipers. I am also grateful to Prof. Ilkka Niiniluoto who gave rise to my interest in this kind of research during a period spent at Department of Philosophy of University of Helsinki, and who made a number of useful suggestions in the final stage of this paper. Moreover, I would like to thank Dr. Carlo Buttasi for suggesting a better formulation of the proof of (T.24).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Festa, R. A measure for the distance between an interval hypothesis and the truth. Synthese 67, 273–320 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00540073

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00540073

Keywords

Navigation