Skip to main content
Log in

Correlations and efficiency: Testing the Bell inequalities

  • Published:
Foundations of Physics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper examines the efficiency problem involved in experimental tests of so-called “local” hidden variables. It separates the phenomenological locality at issue in the Bell case from Einstein's different conception of locality, and shows how phenomenological locality also differs from the factorizability needed to derive the Bell inequalities in the stochastic case. It then pursues the question of whether factorizable, local models (or, equivalently, deterministic ones) exist for the experiments designed to test the Bell inequalities, thus rendering the experimental argument against them incomplete. This leads to an investigation of the so-called “prism models” and to new inequalities for a significant class of such models, inequalities that are testable even at the low efficiencies of the photon correlation experiments.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. M. Born, “Zur Quantenmechanik der Stossvorgänge,”Z. Phys. 38, 803 (1926).

    Google Scholar 

  2. A. Fine,The Shaky Game: Einstein, Realism and the Quantum Theory (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1986). Revised paperback edition 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  3. A. Einstein, B. Podolsky, and N. Rosen, “Can quantum mechanical description of physical reality be considered complete?”Phys. Rev. 47, 777–780 (1935).

    Google Scholar 

  4. D. Bohm,Quantum Theory, pp. 614–622 (Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, 1951).

    Google Scholar 

  5. D. Bohm, “A suggested interpretation of the quantum theory in terms of ‘hidden’ variables, I,”Phys. Rev. 85, 166–179 (1952).

    Google Scholar 

  6. D. Bohm and Y. Aharonov, “Discussion of experimental proof for the paradox of Einstein, Podolsky and Rosen,”Phys. Rev. 108, 1070–1076 (1957).

    Google Scholar 

  7. D. Bohm, “A suggested interpretation of the quantum theory in terms of ‘hidden’ variables, II,”Phys. Rev. 85, 180–193 (1952).

    Google Scholar 

  8. J. S. Bell, “On the Einstein Podolsky Rosen paradox,”Physics 1, 195–200 (1964).

    Google Scholar 

  9. P. C. W. Davies and J. R. Brown,The Ghost in the Atom, pp. 52–56 (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1986).

    Google Scholar 

  10. A. Fine, “Hidden variables, joint probability and the Bell inequalities,”Phys. Rev. Lett. 48, 291–295 (1982).

    Google Scholar 

  11. A. Aspect, J. Dalibard, and G. Roger, “Experimental test of Bell's inequalities using time-varying analyzers,”Phys. Rev. Lett. 49, 1804–1807 (1982).

    Google Scholar 

  12. J. F. Clauser and M. A. Horne, “Experimental consequences of objective local theories,”Phys. Rev. D 10, 526–535 (1974).

    Google Scholar 

  13. A. Fine, “Do correlations need to be explained?” in J. Cushing and E. McMullin, eds.,Philosophical Consequences of Quantum Theory (Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press, Notre Dame, 1989).

    Google Scholar 

  14. N. Cartwright,How the Laws of Physics Lie? (Clarendon Press, New York, 1983).

    Google Scholar 

  15. A. Fine, “Joint distributions, quantum correlations and commuting observables,”J. Math. Phys. 23, 1306–1310 (1982).

    Google Scholar 

  16. A. Garg and N. D. Mermin, “Correlation inequalities and hidden variables,”Phys. Rev. Lett. 49, 1220–1223 (1982).

    Google Scholar 

  17. A. Garg,Phys. Rev. D 28, 785–790 (1983).

    Google Scholar 

  18. P. M. Pearle, “Hidden variable example based on data rejection,”Phys. Rev. D 2, 1418–1425 (1970).

    Google Scholar 

  19. A. Fine, “Correlations and physical locality,” in P. Asquith and R. Giere, eds.,P.S.A. 1980, Vol. 2 (Philosophy of Science Association, East Lansing, 1981), pp. 535–562.

    Google Scholar 

  20. A. Fine, “Some local models for correlation experiments,”Synthese 50, 279–294 (1982).

    Google Scholar 

  21. D. Home and T. W. Marshall, “A stochastic local realist model for the EPR atomiccascade experiment which reproduces the quantum mechanical coincidence rates,”Phys. Lett. 113A, 183–186 (1985).

    Google Scholar 

  22. H. P. Seipp, “Bell's theorem and an explicit stochastic local hidden variables model,”Found. Phys. 16, 1143–1152 (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  23. A. Aspect and P. Grangier, “Tests of Bell's inequalities with pairs of low energy correlated photons: An experimental realization of Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen-type correlations,” in P. Lahti and P. Mittelstaedt, eds.,Symposium on the Foundations of Modern Physics (World Scientific, Singapore, 1985).

    Google Scholar 

  24. A. Garg and N. D. Mermin, “Detector inefficiencies in the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen experiment,”Phys. Rev. D 35, 3831–3835 (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  25. R. Sargent, “Explaining the success of science,” in A. Fine and J. Leplin, eds.,P.S.A. 1988, Vol. 1 (Philosophy of Science Association, East Lansing, 1988), pp. 55–63.

    Google Scholar 

  26. D. Howard, “Holism, separability and the metaphysical implications of the Bell experiments,” in J. Cushing and E. McMullin, eds.,Philosophical Consequences of Quantum Theory (University of Notre Dame Press, Notre Dame, 1989).

    Google Scholar 

  27. L. E. Ballentine and J. P. Jarrett, “Bell's theorem: Does quantum mechanics contradict relativity?”Am. J. Phys. 55, 696–701 (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  28. F. M. Kronz, “Hidden locality, conspiracy and superluminal signals,”Phil. Sc. (in press).

  29. A. Fine, “Inequalities for non-ideal correlation experiments” (in press).

  30. T. K. Lo and A. Shimony, “Proposed molecular test of local hidden-variables,”Phys. Rev. A 23, 3003–3012 (1981).

    Google Scholar 

  31. F. J. Belinfante,A Survey of Hidden-Variable Theories (Pergamon, Oxford, 1973).

    Google Scholar 

  32. M. Redhead,Incompleteness, Nonlocality and Realism (Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1987).

    Google Scholar 

  33. A. Einstein, “Physik und Realität,”J. Franklin Inst. 221, 313–347; translated as “Physics and Reality,”221, 349–382 (1936).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Dedicated to David Bohm on the occasion of his 70th birthday, December 20, 1987.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fine, A. Correlations and efficiency: Testing the Bell inequalities. Found Phys 19, 453–478 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00734654

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00734654

Keywords

Navigation