Skip to main content
Log in

Model theory for modal logic part I—The De re/de dicto distinction

  • Article
  • Published:
Journal of Philosophical Logic Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Reference

  1. Bowen, K. A., 1975, ‘Normal Modal Model Theory’, Journal of Philosophical Logic 4, 2, 97–131.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bressan, A., 1972, A General Interpreted Modal Calculus, Yale University Press.

  3. Broido, J., Model-Theoretic Methods and Quantification into Modal Contexts, Ph.D. Thesis, University of Pittsburgh.

  4. Chang, C. C. and Keisler, G., 1973, Model Theory, North-Holland.

  5. Fine, K., ‘Failures of the Interpolation Lemma in Modal Logic’, submitted to Journal of Symbolic Logic.

  6. Fine, K., 1975, ‘On Some Connections Between Elementary and Modal Logic’, in Stig Kanger (ed.), Proceedings of the Third Scandinavian Logic Symposium North-Holland.

  7. Hintikka, J., 1961, ‘Modality and Quantification’, Theoria 27, 119–128. Reprinted in Models for Modalities, Reidel Press, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Kaplan, D., 1975, ‘How to Russell a Frege-Church’, Journal of Philosophy, LXXII, 19, 716–726.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kripke, S., 1963, ‘Semantical Considerations on Modal Logic’, Acta Philosophica, Fennica, 16, 83–94. Reprinted in L. Linsky (ed.), Reference and Modality, Oxford University Press, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Tichy, P., 1975, ‘On de dicto Modalities in Quantified S5’, Journal of Philosophical Logic 2, 387–392.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Thomason, R. H., 1970, ‘Some Completeness Results for Modal Predicate Calculi’, in K. Lambert (ed.), Philosophical Problems in Logic, D. Reidel (1970).

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fine, K. Model theory for modal logic part I—The De re/de dicto distinction. J Philos Logic 7, 125–156 (1978). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00245925

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00245925

Keywords

Navigation