Skip to main content
Log in

Model theory for modal logic—Part III existence and predication

  • Published:
Journal of Philosophical Logic Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Fine, K., Postscript to Worlds, Times and Selves (with A. N. Prior), Duckworth, England (1977).

  2. FineK., ‘Propositions, Sets and Properties,’ Journal of Philosophical Logic 6 (1977), 135–191.

    Google Scholar 

  3. FineK., ‘Review of [9],’ Philosophical Review 86 (1977), 562–66.

    Google Scholar 

  4. FineK., ‘Model Theory for Modal Logic—Part I,’ Journal of Philosophical Logic 7 (1978), 125–156.

    Google Scholar 

  5. FineK., ‘Model Theory for Modal Logic—Part II,’ Journal of Philosophical Logic 7 (1978), 277–306.

    Google Scholar 

  6. FineK., ‘The Interpolation Lemma Fails for Quantified S5,’ Journal of Symbolic Logic 44 (1979), 201–206.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Fine, K., ‘First-Order Modal Theories — I Sets, II Propositions, III Facts’, in Nous (1981), Studia Logica XXXIX, 2/3 (1980), 159–202, and Synthese (1981), respectively.

  8. KripkeS., ‘Semantical Considerations on Modal Logic,’ Acta Philosophica Fennica 16, 83–94. Reprinted in L. Linsky (ed.), Reference and Modality, Oxford University Press (1971).

    Google Scholar 

  9. PlantingaA., The Nature of Necessity, Clarendon Press, Oxford (1974).

    Google Scholar 

  10. PriorA. N., Time and Modality, Clarendon Press, Oxford (1957).

    Google Scholar 

  11. StalnakerR., ‘Complex Predicates,’ Monist 60 (1977), 327–339.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

This paper is the third and final part of a series (see the references below). It was completed and submitted to the Journal of Philosophical Logic in 1977, at about the same time as the other parts. But because of some mishap in the mail, its publication was delayed. The present part is independent from the other parts in its results, but draws upon the terminology of Section 2 of Part I.

I should like to thank the editor, R. Thomason, for many valuable remarks on the earlier version of the paper.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fine, K. Model theory for modal logic—Part III existence and predication. J Philos Logic 10, 293–307 (1981). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00293421

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00293421

Keywords

Navigation