Necessary and contingent truth in William Whewell's antithetical theory of knowledge

https://doi.org/10.1016/0039-3681(85)90014-7Get rights and content

First page preview

First page preview
Click to open first page preview

References (118)

  • L. Laudan

    William Whewell on the Consilience of Inductions

    The Monist

    (1971)
  • Nicholas Rescher

    Conceptual Idealism

    David B. Wilson

    Herschel and Whewell on Newton

    J. His. Ideas

    (1974)
    David B. Wilson

    Herschel and Whewell on Newton

    J. His. Ideas

    (1974)
  • Second Memoir

    Trans. Camb. Phil. Soc.

    (1848)

    Phil. of Disc.

    (1858)
  • Butts

    Necessary Truth in Whewell's Theory of Science

    American Phil. Quart.

    (1965)
  • On Walsh's Reading of Whewell's view of Necessity

    Phil. of Sci.

    (1965)
  • “Necessary Truth in Whewell's Theory of Science” p....
  • Necessary Truth in Whewell's Theory of Science, p. 172. This I believe is one of the weaker points of Butts' exegesis....
  • “Whewell's Logic of...
  • “Necessary Truth in Whewell's Theory of Science”, p. 179f. This has been accepted by almost all commentators as the...A. Belsey

    Interpreting Whewell

    Stud. Hist. Phil. of Sci.

    (1974)
    Richard Yeo

    William Whewell, Natural Theology and the Philosophy of Science in mid-nineteenth Century Britain

    Annals of Science

    (1979)
  • Philosophy

    (1840)
  • H.L. Mansel

    Prolegomena Logica

    (1851)
    Whewell

    A Letter to the Author of Prolegomena Logica

    History

    (20 September 1852)
  • Philosophy I, p....
  • “The First Memoir”, Philosophy II, p....
  • The Philosophy of Discovery

    (1860)
  • On the Grounds of Mathematical Reasoning

    Philosophy

    (1847)
  • Philosophy II, pp. 616–617. The remarks are repeated in Nov. Org. Rev. p....
  • Darwin's Debt to philosophy: An Examination of the Influences of the Philosophical Ideas of J.F.W. Herschel and William Whewell on the Development of Charles Darwin's Theory of Evolution

    Stud. Hist. Phil. Sci.

    (1975)
  • Nov. Org. Ren p. 70. Whewell differentiates between ‘idea’ and ‘concept(ion)’ as follows: “We have given the...
  • Nov. Org. Ren p....
  • Philosophy II, pp....
  • He was obviously wrong — even on account of the fact that his own paradigmatic examples of consilient and simplifying —...
  • R.E. Butts

    Consilience of Inductions and the problem of Conceptual Change in Science

    M.B. Hesse

    Consilience of Inductions

    M. Fisch. “Whewell's Consilience of Inductions — An Evaluation”, note 4 above, esp. notes...
  • See his debate with Mill on Kepler's ellipse referred to in n. 22. Whewell “Of Induction” pp....J.S. Mill

    A System of Logic Ratiocinative and Inductive

  • Since all knowledge according to Whewell is Antithetical, the distinction between fact and theory is not one between...
  • Nov. Org. Ren. p....
  • An Elementary Treatise on Mechanics

    (1819)

    A Treatise on Dynamics

    (1823)

    An Introduction to Dynamics

    (1823)

    On the Free Motion of Points and on Universal Gravitation

    (1832)

    On the Motion of Points Constrained and Resisted and on the Motion of Rigid Bodies

    (1834)

    The first Principles of Mechanics

    (1832)

    Analytic Statics

    (1837)

    Mechanical Euclid

    (1837)
  • “Experience is requisite to the clearness and distinctness of our ideas not because they are derived from experience,...
  • “Second Memoir”, p. 6 (my...
  • “Remarks on Mathematical Reasoning”, Philosophy II,...
  • Aphorism XXVI, Nov. Org. Ren. p. 9 (my...
  • Nov. Org. Ren., Aphorism...
  • Philosophy I, p....
  • A Preliminary Discourse on the Study of Natural Philosophy

    (1830)
  • Cited by (23)

    • Unwarranted assumptions: Claude Bernard and the growth of the vera causa standard

      2020, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A
    • Whewell on the classification of the sciences

      2016, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A
      Citation Excerpt :

      Thanks to the fundamental work of Fisch (1985, 1991) and Yeo (1979, 1993), along with a renewed interest in William Whewell in recent years (see, for instance, Wettersten, 2005; Snyder, 2006; Cobb, 2011; Wilson, 2011), the significance of Whewell's contributions to the philosophy of science is now widely recognized.

    • Whewell's tidal researches: scientific practice and philosophical methodology

      2010, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A
    • It's all necessarily so: William Whewell on scientific truth

      1994, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science
    • William Whewell's conception of scientific revolutions

      1988, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text