Abstract
What does philosophy have to say about the argument that blasphemous art ought not to be publicly displayed? We examine four concepts of blasphemy: blasphemy as offence, attack on religion, attack on the sacred, attack on the blasphemer himself. We argue all four are needed to grasp this complex concept. We also argue for blasphemy as primarily a moral, not a religious concept. We then criticise four arguments for the public display of blasphemous art: it may be beautiful, provocative, devoutly intended, and is autonomous of religious concerns. Finally, we discuss the notions of blasphemy and blasphemous art as public offences. We conclude that the display of blasphemous art is a public, and not merely a private moral offence, and that there are respectable philosophical arguments for this conclusion.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
ABC Radio National, Serrano Forum, Arts Today, 14 October 1997.
Aquinas, St. Thomas, Summa Theologiæ. Various editions.
Augustine (of Hippo), St., De baptismo contra Donastistas. Various editions.
Augustine (of Hippo), St., Sermons. Various editions.
Boyle, J., Grisez, G. & Finnis, J., Incoherence and consequentialism (or proportionalism)-a rejoinder, American Catholic Philosphical Quarterly 64 (1990).
Boyle, J., Grisez, G. & Tollefsen, O., Free Choice: A Self-Referential Argument. Notre Dame: Notre Dame University Press, 1976.
Cobb, J.B. & Griffin, D.R., Process Theology: An Introductory Exposition. Philadelphia: Westminster Press, 1976.
Chrysostom, St. John, Concerning the Statues. Various editions.
Creel, R.E., Divine Impassibility: An Essay in Philosophical Theology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1986.
Dodds, M.J., The Unchanging God of Love. Fribourg: Editions Universitaires Fribourg Suisse, 1986.
Douglas, M., Natural Symbols. Middlesex: Penguin, 1973.
Dworkin, R., Life's Dominion: An Argument about Abortion, Euthanasia, and Individual Freedom. New York: Knopf, 1993.
Eliade, M., Images and Symbol. London: Sheed and Ward, 1969.
Feinberg, J., Offence To Others. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1985.
Finnis, J., Fundamentals of Ethics. Oxford University Press, 1983.
Finnis, J., Natural Law and Natural Rights. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1980.
Foot, P., Morality As A System of Hypothetical Imperatives, Philosophical Review, 81 (1972).
Gadamer, H-G., The Relevance of the Beautiful and Other Essays. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1986.
Gaita, R., Good and Evil: An Absolute Conception. Macmillan, 1991.
George, R.P., Does the ‘incommensurability thesis’ imperil common sense moral judgments? American Journal Jurisdiction 37 (1992).
George, R., Making Men Moral. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1993.
Gregory of Nyssa, St., Contra Apollinaris. Various editions.
Grisez, G., Against Consequentialism, American Journal Jurisdiction 23 (1978).
Grisez, G., Boyle, J. & Finnis, J.M., Practical principles, moral truth, and ultimate ends, American Journal Jurisdiction 32 (1987).
Kant, trans., Lewis W. Beck, Critique of Practical Reason. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill, 1956.
Kass, L., The Wisdom of Repugnance, The New Republic 216(22), (2 June 1997).
Laeuchli, S., Religion and Art in Conflict. Philadelphia: Fortress Press, 1980.
Landesman, C., On violent reactions to art, The Spectator (4th October, 1997).
Lawton, D., Blasphemy. Pennsylvania: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1993.
Levy, L., Treason Against God. New York: Schocken, 1981.
Levy, L., Blasphemy. New York: Knopf, 1993.
Levy, L., Blasphemy: Verbal Offence Against the Sacred from Moses to Salman Rushdie. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1995.
Mannison, D., McRobbie, M. & Routley, R., Environmental Philosophy. Canberra: Australian National University Monograph, 1980.
McCabe, H., God Matters. London: Chapman, 1987.
McWilliams, W., The Passion of God: Divine Suffering in Contemporary Protestant Theology. Macon, GA: Mercer University Press, 1985.
Mill, J.S., in M. Warnock (ed.), Utilitarianism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1979.
Mozley, J.K., The Impassibility of God: A Survey of Christian Thought. London: Cambridge University Press, 1926.
Nussbaum, M., Love's Knowledge. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1990.
New South Wales Law Reform Commission, Report 74, Blasphemy. Sydney: National Library of Australia, 1994.
Otto, R., The Idea of the Holy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1980.
Ramsay, H., Beyond Virtue. London: Macmillan, 1997.
Rawls, J., Political Liberalism. New York: Columbia University Press, 1993.
Ritoli, B., Letter to the Herald Sun (Melbourne), 10 October 1997, p. 20.
Rollins, A., Crucifix artwork prompts complaint, The Age (Melbourne), 7 October 1997, p. A3.
Scanlon, T., A Theory of Free Expression, Philosophical Public Affairs 1(2) (Winter 1972).
Scheffler, S., The Rejection of Consequentialism. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1982.
Smart, J.C. & Williams, B., Utilitarianism: For and Against. London: Cambridge University Press, 1973.
Sherman, N., Making a Necessity of Virtue. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997.
Smith, F., Blasphemy and the Battle for Faith. London: Hodder and Stoughton, 1990.
Smith, M., The Moral Problem. Oxford: Blackwell, 1994.
Sprigge, T., The Satanic Novel: a philosophical dialogue on blasphemy and censorship, Inquiry 33 (1990).
Stout, J., Ethics After Babel. Boston: Beacon Press, 1988.
Sullivan, R., Immanuel Kant's Moral Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989.
Stith, R., On Death and Dworkin: A Critique of His Theory of Inviolability, Maryland Law Review 56 (1997).
Taylor, P., Respect for Nature: A Theory of Environmental Ethics. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1996.
Turner, V., The Ritual Process. Chicago: Aldine, 1969.
Webster, R., A Brief History of Blasphemy. Southwold: Orwell Press, 1990.
Weinandy, T.G., Does God Change? The Word's Becoming in the Incarnation. Still River, Mass.: St Bede's Publications, 1985.