Skip to main content
Log in

Signed orders in linear and nonlinear utility theory

  • Published:
Theory and Decision Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Self-reflecting signed orders on a set A and its anti-set A * were introduced previously as a way to account for negative as well as positive feelings about the inclusion of items in A in potential subsets of choice. The present paper extends the notion of signed orders to lotteries on AA *, describes reflection axioms for the lottery context, and shows how these axioms simplify utility representations for preference between lotteries. The simplified representations are then used to guide procedures for extending preferences from AA * and its lotteries to preferences between subsets of items.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bossert, W.: 1989, ‘On the Extension of Preferences over a Set to the Power Set: An Axiomatic Characterization of a Quasi-Ordering’, Journal of Economic Theory 49, 84–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bossert, W.: 1993, ‘Preference Extension Rules for Ranking Sets of Alternatives with a Fixed Cardinality’, Preprint, Department of Economics, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chew, S.H.: 1983, ‘A Generalization of the Quasilinear Mean with Applications to the Measurement of Income Inequality and Decision Theory Resolving the Allais Paradox’, Econometrica 51, 1065–1092.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chew, S.H. and MacCrimmon, K.R.: 1979, ‘Alpha-Nu Choice Theory: A Generalization of Expected Utility Theory’, Working Paper No. 669, University of British Columbia, Vancouver.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellingsen, T.: 1994, ‘Cardinal Utility: A History of Hedonimetry’, in: Allais, M. and Hagen, O. (eds.), Cardinalism, Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, pp. 105–165.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fishburn, P.C.: 1970, Utility Theory for Decision Making, Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fishburn, P.C.: 1972, ‘Even-Chance Lotteries in Social Choice Theory’, Theory and Decision 3, 18–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fishburn, P.C.: 1976, ‘Cardinal Utility: An Interpretive Essay’, International Review of Economics and Business 23, 1102–1114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fishburn, P.C.: 1982a, The Foundations of Expected Utility, Reidel, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fishburn, P.C.: 1982b, ‘Nontransitive Measurable Utility’, Journal of Mathematical Psychology 26, 31–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fishburn, P.C.: 1983, ‘Transitive Measurable Utility’, Journal of Economic Theory 31, 293–317.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fishburn, P.C.: 1988, Nonlinear Preference and Utility Theory, Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fishburn, P.C.: 1992a, ‘Signed Orders and Power Set Extensions’, Journal of Economic Theory 56, 1–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fishburn, P.C.: 1992b, ‘Multiattribute Signed Orders’, Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis 1, 3–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fishburn, P.C. and LaValle, I.H.: 1993, ‘Subset Preferences in Linear and Nonlinear Utility Theory’, Journal of Mathematical Psychology 37, 611–623.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gärdenfors, P.: 1976, ‘Manipulation of Social Choice Functions’, Journal of Economic Theory 13, 217–228.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hausner, M.: 1954, ‘Multidimensional Utilities’, in: Thrall, R.M., Coombs, C.H. and Davis, R.L. (eds.), Decision Processes, Wiley, New York, pp. 167–180.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herstein, I.N. and Milnor, J.: 1953, ‘An Axiomatic Approach to Measurable Utility’, Econometrica 21, 291–297.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kannai, Y. and Peleg, B.: 1984, ‘A Note on the Extension of an Order on a Set to the Power Set’, Journal of Economic Theory 32, 172–175.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krantz, D.H., Luce, R.D., Suppes, P. and Tversky, A.: 1971, Foundations of Measurement, Vol. I, Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kreweras, G.: 1961, ‘Sur une possibilité de rationaliser les intransitivités’, La Décision, Colloques Internationaux CNRS, Paris, pp. 27–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pattanaik, P.K. and Peleg, B.: 1984, ‘An Axiomatic Characterization of the Lexicographic Maximin Extension of an Ordering over a Set to the Power Set’, Social Choice and Welfare 1, 113–122.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Neumann, J. and Morgenstern, O.: 1944, Theory of Games and Economic Behavior, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wakker, P.P.: 1989, Additive Representations of Preferences, Kluwer, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fishburn, P.C., La Valle, I.H. Signed orders in linear and nonlinear utility theory. Theor Decis 40, 79–101 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00133161

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00133161

Key words

Navigation