Skip to main content
Log in

Abstract

In a certain sense, uncertainty andignorance have been recognized in science andphilosophy from the time of the Greeks.However, the mathematical sciences have beendominated by the pursuit of certainty.Therefore, experiments under simplified andidealized conditions have been regarded as themost reliable source of knowledge. Normally,uncertainty could be ignored or controlled byapplying probability theory and statistics.Today, however, the situation is different.Uncertainty and ignorance have moved intofocus. In particular, the global character ofsome environmental problems has shown that theproblems cannot be disregarded. Therefore,scientists and technologists have in many wayscome into a new situation. The Chernobylaccident is a dramatic example, however,problems such as a possible greenhouse effect,a possible reduction of the ozone layer, and soon are all of the same type. These encompasstotally different problems than scientists andtechnologists are traditionally trained to dealwith. In these cases, the standard use ofstatistics has to change, the burden of proofshould be reversed, one should draw ondifferent kinds of expertise, and, in general,science should be ``democratized.''

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Auyang, Sunny Y., Foundations of Complex-System Theories (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1998).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bak, Per, How Nature Works. The Science of Self-Organized Criticality (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1997).

    Google Scholar 

  • Feyerabend, Paul, Science in a Free Society (NLB, London, 1978).

    Google Scholar 

  • Funtowicz, Silvio and Jerome Ravetz, Uncertainty and Quality in Science for Policy (Kluwer, Dordrecht, 1990).

    Google Scholar 

  • Funtowicz, Silvio og Jerome Ravetz, “Science for the Post-Normal Age,” Futures (September, 1993), 739–755.

  • Galilei, Galileo, Dialogue Concerning Two New Sciences (1638), translated by Henry Crew and Alfonso de Salvio (1914) (Dover Publications, New York, 1954).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gigerenzer, Gerd, Zeno Swijtink, Theodore Porter, Lorraine Daston, John Beatty, and Lorenz Krüger, The Empire of Chance. How probability changed science and everyday life (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1989).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hacking, Ian, “The Self-Vindication of the Laboratory Sciences,” in Andrew Pickering (ed.), Science as Practice and Culture (The University of Chicago Press, Chicago and London, 1992), 29–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koyré, Alexandre, “Galileo and Plato,” in A. Koyré (ed.), Metaphysics and Measurement (1943) (Johns Hopkins Press, Baltimore and London, 1968).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, Thomas, “Postscript? 1969,” The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1970).

    Google Scholar 

  • Levine, Adeline Gordon, Love Canal: Science, Politics, and People (Lexington Books, Lexington, MA, 1982).

    Google Scholar 

  • Latour, Bruno, Science in Action (Open University Press, Milton Keynes, 1987).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lorenz, Edward N., “Deterministic Nonperiodic Flow,” Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences 20 (1963), reprinted in Predrag Cvitanovic (ed.), Universality in Chaos (Adam Hilger, 2. ed. Bristol and New York, 1989), 367–378.

  • Nicolis, Grégoire and Ilya Prigogine, Exploring Complexity (Freeman and Company, New York, 1989).

    Google Scholar 

  • Paigen, Beverly, “Controversy at Love Canal,” The Hastings Center Report (June, 1982), 29–37.

  • Peterman, Randall M., “Statistical Power Analysis can Improve Fisheries Research and Management,” Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 47 (1990), 1–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peters, Robert Henry, A Critique for Ecology (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1991).

    Google Scholar 

  • Savan, Beth, Science under Siege: The Myth of Objectivity in Scientific Research (CBC Enterprises, Montreal, 1988).

    Google Scholar 

  • Shrader-Frechette, Kristin, Risk and Rationality (Univ. of California Press, Berkeley, 1991).

    Google Scholar 

  • Toulmin, Stephen, Cosmopolis. The Hidden Agenda of Modernity (The Free Press, New York, 1990).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wynne, Brian, “Uncertainty and Environmental Learning,” Global Environmental Change (June, 1992), 111–127.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fjelland, R. Facing the Problem of Uncertainty. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 15, 155–169 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015001405816

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015001405816

Navigation