Notes
All parenthetical page numbers refer to this work.
References
Dietrich M, Skipper RA (forthcoming) Manipulating underdetermination in scientific controversy: The case of the molecular clock. Perspectives on Science
Earman J (1992) Bayes or bust? A critical examination of Bayesian confirmation theory. MIT Press, Cambridge
Godfrey-Smith P (2003) Theory and reality: An introduction to the philosophy of science. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago
Kitcher P (1990) The division of cognitive labor. J Phil 87(1):5–22
Kitcher P (1993) The advancement of science. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Laudan L (1981) A confutation of convergent realism. Phil Sci 48:19–49
Platt JR (1964) Strong inference. Science 146:347–353
Salmon WC (1990) Rationality and objectivity in science or Tom Kuhn meets Tom Bayes. In: Savage W (ed) Scientific theories, vol 14. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, pp 175–204
Stanford PK (2006) Exceeding our grasp: Science, history, and the problem of unconceived alternatives. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Strevens M (2003) The role of the priority rule in science. J Phil 100(2):55–79
Strevens M (2006) The role of the Matthew effect in science. Studies History Phil Sci 37:159–170
Van Fraassen BC (1980) The scientific image. Clarendon, Oxford
Acknowledgements
I would like to thank Kyle Stanford for entertaining my questions about his views.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Forber, P. Forever beyond our grasp?. Biol Philos 23, 135–141 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10539-007-9074-x
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10539-007-9074-x