Abstract
Charles Peirce is often credited for being among the first, perhaps even the first, to develop a scientific metaphysics of indeterminism. After rejecting the received view that Peirce developed his views from Darwin and Maxwell, I argue that Peirce's view results from his synthesis of Immanuel Kant's critical philosophy and George Boole's contributions to formal logic. Specifically, I claim that Kant's conception of the laws of logic as the basis for his architectonic, when combined with Boole's view of probability, yields Peirce's metaphysics of probabilistic laws. Indeterminism provides, therefore, an excellent illustration of how Peirce attempted to use logic to clarify metaphysical problems.“Since everyone must have conceptions of things in general, it is most important that they should be carefully constructed. I shall enter into no criticism of the different methods of metaphysical research, but shall merely say that in the opinions of several great thinkers, the only successful mode yet lighted upon is that of adopting our logic as our metaphysics”. (W1: 490, 1866)2
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Almeder, R.: 1980, The Philosophy of Charles Peirce: A Critical Introduction, APQ Library of Philosophy, New Jersey.
Boole, G.: 1854/1958, An Investigation of the Laws of Thought on which are Founded the Mathematical Theories of Logic and Probabilities, Dover Books, New York.
Esposito, J.: 1980, Evolutionary Metaphysics, Ohio University Press, Athens, OH.
Forster, P.: 1997, ‘Logical Foundations of Peirce's Indeterminism', in Forster, P. and Brunning, J. (eds.), The Rule of Reason: The Philosophy of Charles Sanders Peirce, University of Toronto Press, Toronto.
Goudge, T.: 1950, The Thought of Charles Peirce, University of Toronto Press, Toronto.
Hailperin, T.: 1986, Boole's Logic and Probability, Elsevier Science Publishers, North Holland.
Hartshorne, C.: 1941, ‘Charles Sanders Peirce's Metaphysics of Evolution', New England Quarterly XIV, 51.
Hausman, C.: 1993, Charles S. Peirce's Evolutionary Epistemology, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Hookway, C.: 1985, Peirce, Routledge and Keegan Paul, London.
Kant, I.: 1787/1929, Critique of Pure Reason, N. Kemp Smith (trans.), St. Martin's Press, New York.
Kant, I.: 1800/1974, Logic, R. Hartman and W. Schwarz (trans.), Dover Books, New York.
Kant, I.: c 1780/1992, Lectures on Logic, J.M. Young (trans.), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Levi, I.: 1997, ‘Inference and Logic According to Peirce’, in Forster, P. and Brunning, J. (eds.), The Rule of Reason: The Philosophy of Charles Sanders Peirce, University of Toronto Press, Toronto.
Lewis, C. I.: 1960, A Survey of Symbolic Logic: The Classic Algebra of Logic, Dover Books, New York.
Murphey, M.: 1961, The Development of the Philosophy of Charles Peirce, Hackett Publishing Company, Indianapolis.
Peirce, C.: 1931, Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce. vols. 1–8, C. Hartshorne et. al. (eds.), Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
Peirce, C.: 1982, Writings of Charles S. Peirce: A Chronological Edition. vols. 1 and 4, M. Fisch et. al. (eds.), Indiana University Press, Bloomington.
Peirce, C.: 1992, Reasoning and the Logic of Things, K. Ketner (ed.), Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
Reich, K.: 1992, The Completeness of Kant's Table of Judgements, J. Kneller and M. Losonsky (trans.), Stanford University Press, Stanford.
Whately, R.: 1856, Elements of Logic, James Munroe and Company, Cambridge.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Forster, P. Kant, Boole and Peirce's Early Metaphysics. Synthese 113, 43–70 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005012100305
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005012100305