Abstract
While the critically oriented writings of Immanuel Kant remain the key theoretical grounds from which universalists challenge reduction of international rights law and protection to the practical particularities of sovereign states, Kant’s theory can be read as also a crucial argument for a human rights regime ordered around sovereign states and citizens. Consequently, universalists may be tempted to push Kant’s thinking to greater critical examination of ‘the human’ and its properties. However, such a move to more theoretical rigour in critique only solidifies the subversive statism of Kant’s apparent universalism, as long as it remains embedded in his prior theory of critical philosophy that privileges a singular form of reason. Universalist theories of human rights can break with this contradiction only insofar as they also displace the right to philosophy from the subject and site of ‘civil’ man to a politics of theory where no such subject or site is guaranteed.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Apel K–O (2007) Discourse Ethics, Democracy, and International Law: Toward a Globalization of Practical Reason. American Journal of Economics and Sociology 66(1):49–70
Beck G (2006) Immanuel Kant’s Theory of Rights. Ratio Juris 19(4):371–401
Beiner R (2011) Paradoxes in Kant’s Account of Citizenship. In: Payne C and Thorpe L (eds) Kant and the Concept of Community, Rochester University Press, Rochester, pp. 209–225
Bohman J (2009) Living Without Freedom: Cosmopolitanism at Home and the Rule of Law. Political Theory 37(4):539–561.
Clarke EO (2011) Kant’s Kiss: Reflections on the Philosophy of Lifestyle. boundary 2 38(2): 189–206
Cohen AA (2009) Kant’s Concept of Freedom and the Human Sciences. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 39(1):113–136
Dean R (2006) The Value of Humanity in Kant’s Moral Theory. Clarendon Press, Oxford
Demenchonok E (2009) The Universal Concept of Human Rights as a Regulative Principle: Freedom Versus Paternalism. American Journal of Economics and Sociology 68(1): 273–301
Feger H (2007) The Chain of Freedom: Moral Autonomy with Cosmopolitan Intent. The Review of Metaphysics 60(4):833–853
Fenves P (2005) Marital, Martial, Maritime Law: Toward Some Contraversial Passages in Kant’s “Doctrine of Right.” Diacritics 35(4):101–120
Flikschuh K (2000) Kant and Modern Political Philosophy. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Franke MFN (2008) The Displacement of the Rights of Displaced Persons: An Irreconciliation of Human Rights Between Place and Movement. Journal of Human Rights 7(3):262–281
Franke MFN (2001) Global Limits: Immanuel Kant, International Relations, and Critique of World Politics. State University of New York Press, Albany
Franke MFN (2011) The Unbearable Rightfulness of Being Human: Citizenship, Displacement, and the Right to Not Have Rights. Citizenship Studies 15(1): 39–56
Geiger I (2010) What is the Use of the Universal Law Formula of the Categorical Imperative? British Journal for the History of Philosophy 18(2):271–295
Grimshaw J (1986) Philosophy and Feminist Thinking. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis
Jackson L (2007) The Individualist? The Autonomy of Reason in Kant’s Philosophy and Educational Views. Studies in Philosophy and Education 26(4):335–344
Kant I (1996a) An Answer to the Question: What is Enlightenment? In: Gregor MJ (ed) Practical Philosophy. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 11–22
Kant I (2007a) Anthropology from a Pragmatic Point of View. In: Zöller G and Louden RB (eds) Anthropology, History, and Education. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 227–429
Kant I (1979) Conflict of the Faculties. University of Nebraska Press, Lincoln and London Kant I (1996b) Critique of Practical Reason. In Gregor MJ (ed) Practical Philosophy. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 133–271
Kant I (1998) Critique of Pure Reason. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Kant I (2007b) Idea for a Universal History With a Cosmopolitan Aim. In: Zöller G and Louden RB (eds) Anthropology, History, and Education. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 108–120
Kant I (2007c) Lectures on Pedagogy. In: Zöller G and Louden RB (eds) Anthropology, History, and Education. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 434 – 485.
Kant I (1996c) The Metaphysics of Morals. In: Gregor MJ (ed) Practical Philosophy. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 353–603
Kant I (1960) Observations on the Feeling of the Beautiful and Sublime. University of California Press, Berkeley
Kant I (1996d) On the Common Saying: That May be Correct in Theory, but is of No Use in Practice. In: Gregor MJ (ed) Practical Philosophy. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 273–309
Kant I (1996e) Toward Perpetual Peace, A Philosophical Project. In: Gregor MJ (ed) Practical Philosophy. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 315–351
Kleingeld P (2012) Kant and Cosmopolitanism: The Philosophical Ideal of World Citizenship. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Longuenesse B (2005) Kant on the Human Standpoint. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Louden RB (2011) Kant’s Human Being: Essays on His Theory of Human Nature. Oxford University Press, Oxford
McCarty R (2010) Kant’s Derivation of the Formula of Universal Law. Dialogue: Canadian Philosophical Review/Revue canadienne de philosophie 49(1):113–133
Mendus S (1992) Kant: An Honest But Narrow–Minded Bourgeois? In: Williams H (ed) Essays on Kant’s Political Philosophy. University of Wales Press, Cardiff, pp 166–190
Nancy J–L (1993) The Experience of Freedom. Stanford University Press, Stanford
Okin SM (1982) Women and the Making of the Sentimental Family. Philosophy and Public Affairs 11:65–88
Pfordtend D (2009) On the Dignity of Man in Kant. Philosophy 84(3):371–391
Plumwood V (1993) The Politics of Reason: Towards a Feminist Logic. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 71:436–462
Rumsey JP (1997) Re–visions of Agency in Kant’s Moral Theory. In: Schott RM (ed) Feminist Interpretations of Immanuel Kant. Pennsylvania State University Press, University Park, pp 125–144
Satkunanandan S (2011) The Extraordinary Categorical Imperative. Political Theory 39(2): 234–260
Schott RM (1997) The Gender of Enlightenment. In: Schott RM (ed) Feminist Interpretations of Immanuel Kant. Pennsylvania State University Press, University Park, pp 319–337
Schott RM (1998a) Feminism and Kant: Antipathy or Sympathy? In: Kneller J and Axinn S (eds) Autonomy and Community. State University of New York Press, Albany, pp 87–100
Schott RM (1998b) Kant. In: Jaggar A and Young IM (eds) A Companion to Feminist Philosophy. Blackwell Publishers, Malden, pp 39–48
Shabel L (2004) Kant’s Argument from Geometry. Journal of the History of Philosophy 42(2): 195–215
Sokoloff WW (2001) Kant and the Paradox of Respect. American Journal of Political Science 45(4):768–779
Sussman D (2008) Shame and Punishment in Kant’s Doctrine of Right. The Philosophical Quarterly 58(231):299–317
Szymkowiak A (2009) Kant’s Permissive Law: Critical Rights, Sceptical Politics. British Journal for the History of Philosophy 17(3):567–600
Thorpe L (2011) Kant on the Relationship Between Autonomy and Community. In: Payne C and Thorpe L (eds) Kant and the Concept of Community. University of Rochester Press, Rochester, pp 63–87
Varden H (2006) Kant and Dependency Relations: Kant on the State’s Right to Redistribute Resources to Protect the Rights of Dependents. Dialogue: Canadian Philosophical Review/Revue canadienne de philosophie 45(2):257–284
Verhaegh M (2006) Property by Agreement: Interpreting Kant’s Account of Right. British Journal for the History of Philosophy 14(4):687–717
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Franke, M.F.N. A Critique of the Universalisability of Critical Human Rights Theory: The Displacement of Immanuel Kant. Hum Rights Rev 14, 367–385 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12142-013-0284-0
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12142-013-0284-0