Abstract
VP ellipsis generally requires a syntactically matching antecedent. However, many documented examples exist where the antecedent is not appropriate. Kehler (2000, Linguistics and philosophy 23(6), 533–575. 2002, Coherence, Reference and the Theory of Grammer, CSLI Publications. Stanford.) proposed an elegant theory which predicts a syntactic antecedent for an elided VP is required only for a certain discourse coherence relation (resemblance), not for cause-effect relations. Most of the data Kehler used to motivate his theory come from corpus studies and thus do not consist of true minimal pairs. We report five experiments testing predictions of the coherence theory, using standard minimal pair materials. The results raise questions about the empirical basis for coherence theory because a syntactically-matching antecedent is preferred for all coherence relations, not just resemblance relations. Further, strict identity readings, which should not be available when a syntactic antecedent is required, are influenced by parallelism per se, holding the discourse coherence relation constant. This draws into question the causal role of coherence relations in processing VP ellipsis.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Arregui, A., Clifton, C., Frazier, L., and Moulton, K. To appear, ‘Processing Elided Verb Phrases with Flawed Antecedents: The Recycling Hypothesis. Journal of Memory and Language.
Carlson, K., C. Clifton Jr., and L. Frazier: In progress, ‘VP-ellipsis Parallelism and Focus Structure’.
C.G. Chambers R. Smyth (1998) ArticleTitle‘Structural Parallelism and Discourse Coherence: A Test of Centering Theory’ Journal of Memory and Language 39 593–608 Occurrence Handle10.1006/jmla.1998.2575
N. Chomsky (1981) Lectures on Government and Binding Foris New York
R.A. Crawley R. J. Stevenson D. Kleinman (1990) ArticleTitle‘The Use of Heuristic Strategies in the Interpretation of Pronouns’ Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 19 245–264 Occurrence Handle10.1007/BF01077259
M. Dalrymple S. Shieber F. Pereira (1991) ArticleTitle‘Ellipsis and Higher-Order Unification’ Linguistics and Philosophy 14 399–452 Occurrence Handle10.1007/BF00630923
R. Fiengo R. May (1994) Indices and Identity MIT Press Cambridge, MA
L. Frazier C. Clifton (2000) ArticleTitle‘On Bound Variable Interpretations: The LF-only Hypothesis’ Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 29 125–139 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1005136826534
L. Frazier A. Munn C. Clifton SuffixJr. (2000) ArticleTitle‘Processing Co-Ordinate Structures’ Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 29 343–370 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1005156427600
L. Frazier L. Taft T. Roeper C. Clifton SuffixJr. K. Ehrlich (1984) ArticleTitle‘Parallel Structure: A Source of Facilitation in Sentence Comprehension’ Memory & Cognition 12 421–430 Occurrence Handle10.3758/BF03198303
P.C. Gordon B. J. Grosz L. A. Gilliom (1993) ArticleTitle‘Pronouns, Names and the Centering of Attention in Discourse’ Cognitive Science 17 311–347 Occurrence Handle10.1207/s15516709cog1703_1
J. Hankamer I. Sag (1976) ArticleTitle‘Deep and Surface Anaphora’ Linguistic Inquiry 7 391–428
Hardt, D. 1993. ‘Verb Phrase Ellipsis: Form, Meaning and Processing’, Ph.D. dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.
D. Hardt (1999) ArticleTitle‘Dynamic Interpretation of Verb Phrase Ellipsis’ Linguistics and Philosophy 22 187–221 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1005427813846
Hendriks, P.: 2003, Ambiguous and: Coreference and Contrast in Coordination, University of Groningen manuscript.
A. Hestvik (1995) ArticleTitle‘Reflexives and Ellipsis’ Natural Language Semantics 3 211–237 Occurrence Handle10.1007/BF01249838
Kehler, A.: 1993, ‘The Effects of Establishing Coherence in Ellipsis and Anaphora resolution’, in Proceedings of the 31st Annual Meeting of the Association of Computational Linguistics, Ohio State University, Columbus.
Kehler, A.: 1995, Interpreting Cohesive Forms in the Context of Discourse Inference, Ph.D. dissertation, Harvard University.
A. Kehler (2000) ArticleTitle‘Coherence and the Resolution of Ellipsis’ Linguistics and Philosophy 23 IssueID6 533–575 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1005677819813
A. Kehler (2002) Coherence, Reference and the Theory of Grammar CSLI Publications Stanford
Sag, I.: 1976, Deletion and Logical Form, Ph.D. dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, MA.
Schwarz, F.: 2005, ‘Presuppositions in processing: A case study of German “auch”, Presented at Sinn und Bedeutung, October 2005.
L. P Shapiro A. Hestvik (1995) ArticleTitle‘On-Line Comprehension of VP-ellipsis: Syntactic Reconstruction and the Semantic Influence’ Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 24 517–532 Occurrence Handle10.1007/BF02143165
L. P. Shapiro A. Hestvik L. Lesan A. R. Garcia (2003) ArticleTitle‘Charting the Time-course of VP-Ellipsis Sentence Comprehension: Evidence for Initial and Independent Structural Analysis’ Journal of Memory and Language 49 1–19 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0749-596X(03)00026-3
Simner, J., M. Pickering, and A. Garnham: 2003, ‘Discourse Cues to Ambiguity Resolution: Evidence from “Do it” Comprehension’, Discourse Processes 36.
R. Smyth (1994) ArticleTitle‘Grammatical Determinants of Ambiguous Pronoun Resolution’ Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 23 197–230 Occurrence Handle10.1007/BF02139085
M. Tanenhaus G. Carlson (1990) ArticleTitle‘Comprehension of Deep and Surface Verb Phrase Anaphors’ Language and Cognitive Processes 5 257–280 Occurrence Handle10.1080/01690969008407064
E. Williams (1977) ArticleTitle‘Discourse and Logical Form’ Linguistic Inquiry 8 101–139
F. Wolf E. Gibson T. Desmet (2004) ArticleTitle‘Discourse Coherence and Pronoun Resolution’ Language and Cognitive Processes 19 665–675 Occurrence Handle10.1080/01690960444000034
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Frazier, L., Clifton, C. Ellipsis and discourse coherence. Linguistics & Philosophy 29, 315–346 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10988-006-0002-3
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10988-006-0002-3