Abstract
This paper gives a philosophical outline of the initial foundations of politics as presented in the work of Plato and argues why this traditional philosophical approach can no longer serve as the foundation of politics. The argumentation is mainly based on the work of Latour (1993, 1997, 1999a, 2004, 2005, 2007, 2008) and consists of five parts. In the first section I elaborate on the initial categorization of politics and science as represented by Plato in his Republic. In the second section I discuss the gap between humans and non-humans and how they are tied together in actual real life political topics. In the third section I elaborate on the concepts of political and scientific discourse and how they are thought of as separated fields based on the ancient constitution of human society. In the fourth section I link the concepts of matter of fact and matter of concern. In a final section I present a redefinition of the nature of politics as represented in the work of Bruno Latour as an alternative foundation for the study of political systems.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bloor D.: Knowledge and Social Imagery. Routledge & K. Paul, London (1976)
Bloor D.: Anti-Latour. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 30(1), 81–112 (1999a)
Bloor D.: Discussion: Reply to Bruno Latour. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 30(1), 131–136 (1999b)
de Saussure, F. [1916] (1967). Cours de linguistique générale. Grande Bibliothèque Payot, Paris.
François K., De Sutter L.: When mathematics becomes political. Representing (Non) Humans. Philosophica 74, 23–138 (2004)
Goodin R. E., Klingemann H.-D.: Political science: The discipline. In: Goodin, R. E., Klingemann, H.-D. (eds) A new handbook of political science, pp. 3–49. Oxford University Press, New York (1996)
Haraway, D. J. [1985] (1991). A cyborg manifesto: Science, technology, and socialist-feminism in the late twentieth century. In D. J. Haraway (Ed.), Simians, Cyborgs, and Women. The reinvention of nature (pp. 149–181). London: Free Association Books.
Haraway, D. J. [1987] (1991). Situated knowledges: The science question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspective. In D. J. Haraway (Ed.), Simians, cyborgs, and women. The reinvention of nature (pp. 183–201). London: Free Association Books.
Haraway D. J.: Simians, cyborgs, and women. The reinvention of nature. Routledge, New York (1991)
Haraway, D. J. [1998] (2000). How like a leaf. An interview with Thyrza Nichols goodeve. New York: Routledge.
Husserl, E. (1936). The origin of geometry. In E. Husserl (Ed.), [1935–1937] (1962). Die Krisis der europäischen Wissenschaften und die transzendentale Phänomenologie. Eine Einleitung in die phänomenologische Philosophie. Husserliana, Gesammelte Werke, Band 6, (Hua 6). Herausgegeben von Walter Biemel. 2 Auflage, Martinus Nijhoff, Den Haag.
Kuhn, T. S. [1962] (1970). The structure of scientific revolutions. Second Edition, Enlarged. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Latour, B. (1993). We have never been modern (Translated by Catherine Porter). Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Latour, B. [1991] (1997). Nous n’avons jamais été modernes, Essai d’anthropologie symétrique. La Découverte/Poche 26. Paris: Sciences humaines et sociales.
Latour B.: Politiques de la nature, Comment faire entrer les sciences en démocratie. La Découverte, Paris (1999a)
Latour B.: Discussion: For David Bloor ... and beyond: A reply to David Bloor’s ‘Anti-Latour’. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 30(1), 113–129 (1999b)
Latour, B. (2004). Politics of nature. How to bring the sciences into democracy (Translated by Catherine Porter). Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Latour B.: From Realpolitik to Dingpolitik—or How to Make Things Public. In: Latour, B., Weibel, P. (eds) Making Things Public. Atmospheres of Democracy, ZKM/Center for Art and Media Karlsruhe, pp. 14–41. The MIT Press, Cambridge MA (2005)
Latour B.: Turning around politics. A note on Gerard de Vries’ paper. Social Studies of Science 37(5), 811–820 (2007)
Latour B.: Pour un dialogue entre science politique et science studies. Revue française de science politique 58(4), 657–678 (2008)
Merton, R. K. [1942] (1974). The normative structure of science. In N. W. Storer (Ed.), [1973] (1974). The sociology of science. Theoretical and empirical investigations (pp. 267–278). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Plato (1935). The republic. In Plato in twelve volumes VI the republic, II. The Loeb classical library edition. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Stengers I.: L’Invention des sciences modernes. La Découverte, Paris (1993)
Tickner A. J.: International relations: Post-positivist and feminist perspectives. In: Goodin, R. E., Klingemann, H.-D. (eds) A new handbook of political science, pp. 446–461. Oxford University Press, New York (1996)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
François, K. In-Between Science and Politics. Found Sci 16, 161–171 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10699-010-9195-6
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10699-010-9195-6