Skip to main content
Log in

Remarks on the Theory of Quasi-sets

Studia Logica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Quasi-set theory has been proposed as a means of handling collections of indiscernible objects. Although the most direct application of the theory is quantum physics, it can be seen per se as a non-classical logic (a non-reflexive logic). In this paper we revise and correct some aspects of quasi-set theory as presented in [12], so as to avoid some misunderstandings and possible misinterpretations about the results achieved by the theory. Some further ideas with regard to quantum field theory are also advanced in this paper.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Bain J.: ‘Against particle/field duality: asymptotic particle states and interpolating fields in interacting QFT (or: who’s afraid of Haag’s theorem?)’. Erkenntnis 53, 375–406 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bourbaki, N., Theory of Sets, Hermann and Addison-Wesley.

  3. Castellani, E., ‘Galilean particles: an example of constitution of objects’, in E. Castellani, (ed.), Interpreting Bodies: Classical and Quantum Objects in Modern Physics, Princeton, Princeton Un. Press, 1998, pp. 181–196.

  4. Dalla Chiara, M. L., and G. Toraldo di Francia, Le teorie fisiche: Un’analisi formale, Torino, Boringhieri, 1981.

  5. Domenech G., Holik F.: ‘A discussion on particle number and quantum indistinguishability’. Foundations of Physics 37(6), 855–878 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Domenech G., Holik F., Krause D.: ‘Q-spaces and the foundations of quantum mechanics’. Foundations of Physics 38(11), 969–994 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Domenech, G., F. Holik, L. Kniznik, and D. Krause, ‘No Labeling QuantumMechanics of Indiscernible Particles’, forthcoming in International J. Theoretical Physics.

  8. Falkenburg B.: Particle Metaphysics: A Critical Account of Subatomic Reality. Springer, Berlin (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Fraser D.: ‘The fate of “particles” in quantum field theories with interactions’. Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 39, 841–859 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. French, S., ‘Identity and Individuality in Quantum Theory’, in Edward N. Zalta (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2008 Edition), http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2008/entries/qt-idind/, 2000/2006.

  11. French S., Krause D.: ‘Quantum vagueness’. Erkenntnis 59(1), 97–124 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. French S., Krause D.: Identity in Physics: A Historical, Philosophical, and Formal Analysis. Oxford Un. Press, Oxford (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  13. French S., Krause D.: ‘Quantum sortal predicates’. Synthese 154(3), 417–30 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Halmos P.R.: Naive Set Theory. Springer-Verlag, New-York (1974)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Hodges, W., ‘Elementary predicate logic’, in D. Gabbay and F. Guenthner (eds.), Handbook of Philosophical Logic, Vol.1, Reidel, 1983, pp. 1–133.

  16. Jech, T., ‘About the axiom of choice’, in J. Barwise, (ed.), Handbook of mathematical logic, Amsterdam: North-Holland. (First edition, 1977), 1991, pp. 345–370.

  17. Ketland J.: ‘Structuralism and the identity of indiscernibles’. Analysis 66(4), 303–315 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Krause D.: ‘Structures and structural realism’. Logic Journal of IGPL 13(1), 113–126 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Krause D., Coelho A.M.N.: ‘Identity, indiscernibility, and philosophical claims’. Axiomathes 15, 191–210 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Krause D., Bueno O.: ‘Scientific theories, models, and the semantic approach’. Principia 11(2), 187–201 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Krivine, J. L., Introduction to Axiomatic Set Theory, Springer, 1973.

  22. Mendelson, E., Introduction to Mathematical Logic, 4th ed., Chapman & Hall, 1997.

  23. Muller F.A., Saunders S.: ‘Discerning fermions’. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 59, 499–548 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Quine W.V.: Ontological Relativity and Other Essays. Columbia Un. Press, New York (1977)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Quine, W. V., Philosophy of Logic, Massachusetts and London, 2a. ed: Harvard Un. Press, 1986.

  26. Russell B.: ‘Mr. Strawson on referring’. Mind 66, 385–389 (1957)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Saunders S.: ‘Are quantum particles objects?’. Analysis 66, 52–63 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Schrödinger E.: Science and Humanism. Cambridge Un. Press, Cambridge (1952)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Schrödinger E.: The Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics. Ox Bow Press, Woodbridge (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Simons P.: Parts: A Study in Ontology. Oxford Un. Press, Oxford (1987)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Stachel, J., ‘Structural realism and contextual individuality’, in Y. Ben-Menahem, (ed.), Hilary Putnam, Cambridge, Cambridge Un. Press (Contemporary Philosophy in Focus), 2005, pp. 203–219.

  32. Suppes, P., Representation and Invariance of Scientific Structures, Stanford: CSLI Center for the Study of Language and Information, 2002.

  33. Toraldodi Francia G.: The Investigation of the Physical World. Cambridge Un. Press, Cambridge (1981)

    Google Scholar 

  34. van Fraassen, B., ‘The problem of indistinguishable particles’, in J. T. Cushing, C. F. Delaney, and G.M. Gutting, (eds.), Science and reality: recent works in the philosophy of science, Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press, 1984. (Reprinted in E. Castellani, (ed.), Interpreting Bodies: Classical and Quantum Objects in Modern Physics, Princeton, Princeton Un. Press, 1998, pp. 73–92.)

  35. van Fraassen B.: Quantum Mechanics: An Empiricist View. Clarendon Press, Oxford (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  36. Whitehead, A. N., and B. Russell, Principia Mathematica, Vol. I, Cambridge, Cambridge Un. Press 1910 (reprinted by Mechand Books 2009).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Steven French.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

French, S., Krause, D. Remarks on the Theory of Quasi-sets. Stud Logica 95, 101–124 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11225-010-9249-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11225-010-9249-3

Keywords

Navigation