Abstract
We outline Ladyman's 'metaphysical' or 'ontic' form of structuralrealism and defend it against various objections. Cao, in particular, has questioned theview of ontology presupposed by this approach and we argue that by reconceptualisingobjects in structural terms it offers the best hope for the realist in thecontext of modern physics.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Auyang, S.: 1995, How is Quantum Field Theory Possible?, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Bedard, K.: 1999, 'Material Objects in Bohm's Interpretation', Philosophy of Science 66, 221–242.
Born, M.: 1943, Experiment and Theory in Physics, Dover (rep. 1956).
Born, M.: 1956, Physics in My Generation, Pergamon Press, New York.
Bueno, O.: 1999, 'What is Structural Empiricism? Scientific Change in an Empiricist Setting', Erkenntnis 50, 59–85.
Cao, T.: 1997, Conceptual Development of 20th Century Field Theories, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Cassirer, E.: 1936, Determinism and Indeterminism in Modern Physics, Yale University Press (1956).
Cassirer, E.: 1944, 'Group Concept and Perception Theory', Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 5, 1–35.
Castellani, E. (1998), 'Galilean Particles: An Example of Constitution of Objects' in E.
Castellani (ed.), Interpreting Bodies: Classical and Quantum Objects inModern Physics, Princeton University Press, Princeton, pp. 181–194.
Chakravartty A. (1998), 'Semirealism', Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Science 29, 391–408.
da Costa, N. C. A and S. French: 1990, 'The Model-Theoretic Approach in the Philosophy of Science', Philosophy of Science 57, 248–265.
da Costa, N. C. A. and S. French: 1993, 'Towards an Acceptable Theory of Acceptance: Partial Structures and the General Correspondence Principle', in S. French and H. Kamminga (eds.), Correspondence, Invariance and Heuristics: Essays in Honour of Heinz Post, Reidel, Dordrecht, pp. 137–158.
da Costa, N. C. A. and S. French: 2000, 'Theories, Models and Structures: Thirty Years On', Philosophy of Science; Supp. Proceedings of the 1998 PSA 67, S116–S127.
Demopoulos, W. and M. Friedman: 1985, 'Critical Notice: Bertrand Russell's The Analysis of Matter: Its Historical Context and Contemporary Interest', Philosophy of Science 52, 621–639.
Domski, M.: preprint, 'The Epistemological Foundations of Structural Realism: Poincaré and the Structure of Relations', paper given to the Research Workshop of the Division of History and Philosophy of Science, University of Leeds, Leeds.
Dorato, M.: forthcoming, 'Substantivalism, Relationism and Structural Spacetime Realism', Foundations of Physics.
Dorato, M.: 1999, 'Cao on Substantivalism and the Development of 20th Century Field Theories', Epistemologia 22, 151–166.
Eddington, A.: 1939, The Philosophy of Physical Science, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
English, J.: 1973, 'Underdetermination: Craig and Ramsey', The Journal of Philosophy 70, 453–462.
French, S.: 1989, 'Identity and Individuality in Classical and Quantum Physics', Australasian Journal of Philosophy 67, 432–446.
French, S.: 1997, 'Partiality, Pursuit and Practice', in M. L. Dalla Chiara et al. (eds.), Structures and Norms in Science: Proceedings of the 10th International Congress on Logic, Methodology and Philosophy of Science, Reidel, Dordrecht, pp. 35–52.
French, S.: 1998, 'On theWithering Away of Physical Objects', in E. Castellani (ed.), Interpreting Bodies: Classical and Quantum Objects inModern Physics, Princeton University Press, Princeton, pp. 93–113.
French, S.: 1999, 'Models and Mathematics in Physics: The Role of Group Theory', in J. Butterfield and C. Pagonis (eds.), From Physics to Philosophy, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 187–207.
French, S.: forthcoming, 'The Reasonable Effectiveness ofMathematics: Partial Structures and the Application of Group Theory to Physics', Synthese.
French, S. and J. Ladyman: 1997, 'Superconductivity and Structures: Revisiting the London Account, Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 28, 363–393.
French, S. and J. Ladyman.: 1998), 'A Semantic Perspective on Idealisation in Quantum Mechanics', in N. Shanks (ed.), Idealization IX: Idealization in Contemporary Physics:Pozna'n Studies in the Philosophy of the Sciences and the Humanities, Rodopi, pp. 51–73.
French, S. and J. Ladyman: 1999, 'Reinflating the Semantic Approach', International Studies in The Philosophy of Science 13, 103–121.
Huggett, N.: 1997, 'Identity, Quantum Mechanics and Common Sense', The Monist 80, 118–130.
Krause, D.: 1992, 'On a Quasi-Set Theory', Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 33, 402–411.
Ladyman, J.: 1998, 'What is Structural Realism?', Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 29, 409–424.
Ladyman, J.: 2000, 'What's Really Wrong with Constructive Empiricism? van Fraassen and the Metaphysics of Modality', British Journal for tiThe Philosophy of Science 51, 837–856.
Laudan, L.: 1981, 'A Confutation of Convergent Realism, Philosophy of Science 48, 19–49.
Mikenberg, I., N. C. A. da Costa, and R. Chuaqui: 1986, 'Pragmatic Truth and Approximation to Truth', Journal of Symbolic Logic 51, 201–221.
Mittelstaedt, P.: 1998, 'The Constitution of Objects in Kant's Philosophy and in Modern Physics', in E. Castellani (ed.), Interpreting Bodies: Classical and Quantum Objects in Modern Physics, Princeton University Press, Princeton, pp. 168–180.
Morgan, M. and M. Morrison (eds.): 1999, Models as Mediators, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Morganti, M.: preprint, 'Structural Realism and Experimental Realism: A Possible Realist View of Scientific Knowledge'.
Pagonis, C.: 1996, Quantum Mechanics and Scientific Realism, Ph.D. thesis, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Poincaré, H.: 1905, Science and Hypothesis, Dover (1952).
Post., H. R.: 1971, 'Correspondence, Invariance and Heuristics', Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 2, 213–255.
Psillos, S.: 1999, Scientific Realism: How Science Tracks Truth, Routledge, London. Redhead, M. L. G.: 1995, From Physics to Metaphysics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Redhead, M. L. G.: 1999, 'Quantum Field Theory and the Philosopher', in T. Cao (ed.), Conceptual Foundations of Quantum Field Theory, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Russell, B.: 1912, The Problems of Philosophy.
Saunders, S.: 1993, 'ToWhat Physics Corresponds', in S. French and H. Kamminga (eds.), Correspondence, Invariance and Heuristics: Essays in Honour of Heinz Post, Reidel, Dordrecht, pp. 295–325.
Van Fraassen, B.: 1991, Quantum Mechanics: An Empiricist View, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Van Fraassen, B. C.: forthcoming, 'Structure: Its Shadow and Substance', in P. Ehrlich and R. Jones (eds.), Reverberations of the Shaky Game: Essays in Honor of Arthur Fine, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
Werkmeister, W. H.: 1949, 'Cassirer's Advance Beyond Neo-Kantianism', in P. A. Schilpp (ed.), The Philosophy of Ernst Cassirer, The Library of Living Philosophers, pp. 757–798.
Weyl, H.: 1949, Philosophy of Mathematics and Natural Science, Princeton University Press, Princeton (1963).
Worrall, J.: 1996, 'Structural Realism: The Best of Both Worlds?', in D. Papineau (ed.), The Philosophy of Science, Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 139–165 (originally published in tiDialectica(1989), 43, 99-124).
Worrall, J.: 2000, 'Miracles and Models: Saving Structural Realism?', paper given to the Annual Meeting of the British Society for the Philosophy of Science, Sheffield.
Zahar, E.: 1994, 'Poincaré's Structural Realism and his Logic of Discovery', in G. Heinzmann et al. (eds.), Henri Poincaré: Akten des Internationale Kongresses in Nancy.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
French, S., Ladyman, J. Remodelling Structural Realism: Quantum Physics and the Metaphysics of Structure. Synthese 136, 31–56 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024156116636
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024156116636