Abstract
This article tries to make sense of the concept of the highest good (eternal bliss) in Søren Kierkegaard by comparing it to the analysis of the highest good found in Immanuel Kant. The comparison with Kant’s more systematic analysis helps us clarify the meaning and importance of the concept in Kierkegaard as well as to shed new light on the conceptual relation between Kant and Kierkegaard. The article argues that the concept of the highest good is of systematic importance in Kierkegaard, although previous research has tended to overlook this, no doubt due to Kierkegaard’s cryptic use of the concept. It is argued that Kierkegaard’s concept of the highest good is much closer to Kant’s than what previous research has indicated. In particular, Kant and Kierkegaard see the highest good not only as comprising of virtue and happiness (bliss), but also as being the Kingdom of God.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Byrne P. (2007) Kant on God. Ashgate, Hampshire
Davenport J. J. (2001) The meaning of Kierkegaard’s choice between the aesthetic and the ethical: A response to MacIntyre. In: Davenport J. J., Anthony R. (eds) Kierkegaard after MacIntyre. Open Court, Chicago, pp 75–112
Denis L. (2005) Autonomy and the highest good. Kantian Review 10: 33–59
Di Giovanni G. (2005) Freedom and religion in Kant and his immediate successors. The vocation of mankind, 1774–1800. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Evans C. S. (1999) Kierkegaard’s Fragments and Postscript. Humanity, New York
Frierson P. R. (2003) Freedom and anthropology in Kant’s moral philosophy. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Glenn J. D. Jr. (1997) ‘A highest good ... an eternal happiness’: The human telos in Kierkegaard’s concluding unscientific postscript. In: Perkins R. L. (eds) International Kierkegaard commentary. Concluding Unscientific Postscript to “Philosophical Fragments”. Mercer University Press, Macon, GA, pp 247–262
Green R. M. (1989) The leap of faith: Kierkegaard’s dept to Kant. Philosophy & Theology 3: 385–411
Green R. M. (1992) Kierkegaard and Kant: The hidden debt. Albany, New York
Green R. M. (1997) The limits of the ethical in Kierkegaard’s The Concept of Anxiety and Kant’s Religion within the Limits of Reason Alone. In: Perkins R. L. (eds) International Kierkegaard commentary: The Concept of Anxiety. Mercer University Press, Macon, GA, pp 63–87
Green R. M. (2007) Kant: A debt both obscure and enormous. In: Steward J. (eds) Kierkegaard and his contemporaries. Tome I: philosophy. Ashgate, Hampshire, pp 179–210
Guyer P. (2000) Kant on freedom, law, and morality. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Hannay A. (1993) Kierkegaard. Routledge, London
Hare J. E. (2002) The moral gap. Kantian ethics, human limits, and God’s assistance. Clarendon Press, Oxford
Johansen, K. E. (1988). Begrepet Gjentagelse hos Søren Kierkegaard. Oslo: Solum.
Khan, A. H. (1985). Salighed as happiness? Kierkegaard on the concept Salighed. Waterloo, ON: Wilfred Laurier University Press.
Kleingeld, P., et al. (1995). What do the virtuous hope for? Re-reading Kant’s doctrine of the highest good. In H. Robinson (Ed.), Proceedings of the eighth international Kant congress, Memphis (Vol. 1, pp. 91–112). Milwaukee: Marquette University Press.
Knappe U. (2004) Theory and practice in Kant and Kierkegaard. de Gruyter, Berlin
Koch C. H. (2003) Dansk oplysningsfilosofi 1700–1800. Gyldendal, Copenhagen
Kosch M. (2006) Freedom and reason in Kant, Schelling, and Kierkegaard. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Marina J. (1997) Kant on grace: A reply to his critics. Religious Studies 33: 379–400
Marina J. (2000) Making sense of Kant’s highest good. Kant–Studien 19: 329–355
Michalson G. E. Jr. (1999) Kant and the problem of God. Blackwell, Oxford
Rossi, Ph. J. (1995). The social authority of reason: The “true Church” as the locus for moral progress. In H. Robinson, et al. (Ed.), Proceedings of the eighth international Kant congress, Memphis (Vol. 2, pp. 679–785). Milwaukee: Marquette University Press.
Rossi Ph. J. (2005) The social authority of reason. State University of New York Press, Albany, NY
Schulz H. (2009) Germany and Austria: A modest head start: The German reception of Kierkegaard. In: Stewart J. (eds) Kierkegaard’s international reception. Tome I: Northern and Western Europe. Ashgate, Hampshire, pp 307–420
Stewart J. (2003) Kierkegaard’s relations to Hegel reconsidered. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Theunissen M. (1982) Der Begriff ERNST bei Søren Kierkegaard. Alber, Freiburg
Theunissen M. (1993) Der Begriff Verzweiflung. Suhrkamp, Frankfurt/M
Theunissen M. (2005) Kierkegaard’s concept of despair. Princeton University Press, Princeton
Thuborg A. (1951) Den Kantiske periode i dansk filosofi 1790–1800. Gyldendal, Copenhagen
Wood, A. W. (2001). Kant vs. Eudaimonism. Accessed November 23, 2009 from http://www.stanford.edu/~allenw/webpapers/Eudaimonism. Originally published in Predrag Cicovacki (Ed.), Kant’s legacy: Essays in honor of Lewis White Beck (pp. 261–282). Rochester: University of Rochester.
Zammito J. H. (2002) Kant, Herder and the birth of anthropology. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Fremstedal, R. The concept of the highest good in Kierkegaard and Kant. Int J Philos Relig 69, 155–171 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11153-010-9238-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11153-010-9238-5