Abstract
The purpose of this paper is to consider the role that values play in priority setting through the use of EBP. It is important to be clear about the role of values at all levels of the decision making process. At one level, society as a whole has to make decisions about the kind of health provision that it wants. As is generally accepted, these priority setting questions cannot be answered by medical science alone but involve important judgements of value. However, as I hope to show values come into priority setting questions at another level, one not often explicitly recognised in much of the literature: that of the very definition of the effectiveness of treatments. This has important consequences for patient care. If we do not recognise that the effectiveness of a treatment involve subjective elements — a patient's own assessment of the value of the treatment — then this could lead to the belief that we can purchase one treatment that is the most effective for all patients. This might result in a detrimental reduction in the range of options that a patient is given with some patients not receiving the treatment that is most effective for them.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Beauchamp, T. and Childress, J. (1994) Principles of Biomedical Ethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Brazier, M. (1992) Medicine, Patients and the Law. Harmonsworth: Penguin.
Cooper, X.Y. et al. (1996) Pulmonary Artery Catheters in the Critically Ill: An Overview of Using the Methodology of EBM. Critical Care Clinician 12(4).
Effective Health Care (1992) The Treatment of Persistent Glue Ear in Children, No. 4. Leeds: University of Leeds.
Health Service Management School of Public Policy (HSMC) (1998) Briefing on Priority Setting, No. 4.
Hopkins, A.B. and Solomon, Z. (1996) Can Contacts Drive Clinical Care? British Medical Journal 313.
Klein, R., Day, P. and Redmayne, S. (1996) Managing Scarcity: Priority setting and rationing in the NHS. Buckingham: Open University Press.
Maynard, A. (1997) Evidence-Based Medicine: An Incomplete Method for Informing Treatment Choices. The Lancet 349, 126–128.
Muir Gray, J. (1997) Evidence-Based Health Care: How to Make Health Policy and Management Decisions. London: Churchill Livingstone.
NHS Executive (1998) Research and Development: Towards an Evidence-Base for Health Services, Public Health and Social Care. Leeds: DoH.
Papineau, D. (1996) The Philosophy of Science. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Peckham, M. and Smith, R. (Eds.) (1996) Scientific Basis of Health Services. London: BMJ Publishing Group.
Rosenberg, Q.R. and Donald, Z.W. (1995) Evidence Based Medicine: An Approach to Clinical Problem Solving. British Medical Journal 310, 1122–1126.
Stocking, B. (1995) Why Research Findings are Not Used by Commissions - and What Can be Done About It. Journal of Public Health Medicine 17(4), 380–382.
Suppes, P. (1979) The Logic of Clinical Judgment: Bayesian and other Approaches. In T. Engelhardt et al. (Eds.), Clinical Judgment: A Critical Appraisal. Dordrecht and Boston: D. Reidel Publishing Company.
Sawka, C., Goel, V.,Mahut, C. et al. (199?) Development of a Patient Decision Aid for Choice of Surgical Treatment for Breast Cancer. Health Expectations 1(1), 23-36.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Frith, L. Priority Setting and Evidence Based Purchasing. Health Care Analysis 7, 139–151 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009497307073
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009497307073