Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A Pilot Qualitative Study of “Conflicts of Interests and/or Conflicting Interests” Among Canadian Bioethicists. Part 2: Defining and Managing Conflicts

  • Published:
HEC Forum Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper examines one aspect of professional practice for bioethicists: managing conflicts of interest. Drawing from our qualitative study and descriptive analysis of the experiences of conflicts of interest and/or conflicting interests (COI) of 13 Canadian clinical bioethicists (Frolic and Chidwick 2010), this paper examines how bioethicists define their roles, the nature of COIs in their roles, how their COIs relate to conventional definitions of conflicts of interest, and how COIs can be most effectively managed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • American Society for Bioethics and Humanities. (1998). Core competencies for health care ethics consultation: the report of the American Society for Bioethics and Humanities. Glenview, IL: American Society for Bioethics and Humanities.

  • Baker, R. (2005). A draft model aggregated code of ethics for bioethicists. American Journal of Bioethics, 5(5), 33–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baker, R. (2009) In defense of bioethics. Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics, Spring, 83–92.

  • Baylis, F. (Ed.). (1993). The health care ethics consultant. Totowa, NJ: Humana Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boatright, J. (2001). Financial services. In M. Davis & A. Stark (Eds.), Conflict of interest in the professions (p. 219). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brody, B., Dubler, N., Caplan, A., Kahn, J., Kass, N., Lo, B., et al. (2002). Bioethics consultation in the private sector. Hastings Center Report, 32(3), 14–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cain, D. M., Loewenstein, G., & Moore, D. A. (2005). Coming clean but playing dirtier: the shortcomings of disclosure as a solution to conflicts of interest. In D. A. Moore, et al. (Eds.), Conflicts of interest: challenges and solutions in business, law, medicine, and public policy (pp. 104–125). New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Chambers, T. (2007). The virtue of attacking the bioethicist. In L. Eckenwiler & F. Cohn (Eds.), The ethics of bioethics: mapping the moral landscape (pp. 281–287). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charland, L. (2008). By what authority? Conflicts of interest in professional ethics. Journal of Ethics in Mental Health, 3(2), 1–3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chidwick, P., Bell, J., Connolly, E., Coughlin, M., Frolic, A., Hardingham, L., et al. (2010). Exploring a model role description for ethicists. HEC Forum. doi:10.1007/s10730-010-9126-5.

  • Davis, M. (2001). Introduction. In M. Davis & A. Stark (Eds.), Conflict of interest in the professions (p. 8). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Debruin, D. (2007). Ethics on the inside? In L. Eckenwiler & F. Cohn (Eds.), The ethics of bioethics: Mapping the moral landscape (pp. 161–169). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donalson, T. (2001). The business ethics of bioethics consulting. Hastings Center Report, 31(2), 12–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dubler, N. N., Webber, M. P., Swiderski, D. M., & the Faculty and the National Working Group for the Clinical Ethics Credentialing Project (2009). Charting the future: credentialing, privileging, quality, and evaluation in clinical ethics consultation. Hastings Center Report, 39(6), 23–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freedman, B. (1989). Bringing codes to Newcastle: ethics for clinical ethicists. In B. Hoffmaster & B. Freedman (Eds.), Clinical ethics: theory and practice (pp. 125–139). Clifton, NJ: Humana Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frolic, A., & Chadwick, P. (2010). A qualitative study of "conflicts of interests and/or conflicting interests" among Canadian bioethicists, Part 1: five cases, experiences and lessons learned. HEC Forum. 22(1). doi:10.1007/S10730-010-9124-7.

  • Harrison, C. (2000). Questions to ask about a job as a bioethicist. CBS Newsletter, 5(1), 9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kipnis, K. (1986). Conflict of interest and conflict of obligation. In M. Davis & F. A. Eliston (Eds.), Ethics and the legal profession (p. 291). New York: Prometheus Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kipnis, K., Baker, R., Pearlman R., & Taylor, H. (2007). Report and recommendations on the ASBH Advisory Committee on Ethics Standards (ACES).

  • MacDonald, C. (2003). Draft model code of ethics for bioethics [on-line] www.bioethics.ca/publications-ang.html.

  • MacDonald, C., Coughlin, M., Harrison, C., Lynch, A., Murphy, P., Rowell, M., et al. (2000). Working conditions for bioethics in Canada (v. 8.0). CBS Newsletter, 6(2), 4–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacDonald, C., McDonald, M., & Norman, W. (2002). Charitable conflicts of interest. Journal of Business Ethics, 39, 67–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyers, C. (2007). Clinical ethics consulting and conflict of interest: structurally intertwined. Hastings Center Report, 37(2), 32–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norman, W., & MacDonald, C. (2009). Conflict of interest. In G. Brenkert & T. Beauchamp (Eds.), Oxford handbook of business ethics (pp. 441–470). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Scofield, G. (2008). What is medical ethics consultation? Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics, Spring, 95–118.

  • Sharpe, V. (2007). Strategic disclosure requirements and the ethics of bioethics. In L. Eckenwiler & F. Cohn (Eds.), The ethics of bioethics: Mapping the moral landscape (pp. 170–180). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins UP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stark, A. (2001). Comparing conflicts of interest across the professions. In M. Davis & A. Stark (Eds.), Conflicts of interest in the professions (pp. 335–352). New York: Oxford University Press.

  • Stark, A. (2005). Why are (some) conflicts of interest in medicine so uniquely vexing? In D. A. Moore, et al. (Eds.), Conflicts of interest: Challenges and solutions in business, law, medicine and public policy (pp. 152–180). New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Tyler, T. R. (2005). Managing conflicts of interest within organizations: Does activating social values change the impact of self-interest on behavior? In D. A. Moore, et al. (Eds.), Conflicts of interest: Challenges and solutions in business, law, medicine, and public policy (pp. 13–35). New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Weijer, C. (1999). We’re alright Jack. An argument urging CBS to develop a policy on working conditions for bioethicists. CBS Newsletter, 4(2), 11–12.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andrea Frolic.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Frolic, A., Chidwick, P. A Pilot Qualitative Study of “Conflicts of Interests and/or Conflicting Interests” Among Canadian Bioethicists. Part 2: Defining and Managing Conflicts. HEC Forum 22, 19–29 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10730-010-9125-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10730-010-9125-6

Keywords

Navigation