Abstract
Employees face an array of moral issues in their everyday decision making. Environmental concerns, employee and community welfare, and the interests of other companies (competitors, customers, and suppliers) are only a few examples. Yet, businesses do not always address the issue of how employees should assess the moral import of their actions and incorporate these considerations into their decisions. As a result, moral considerations are often ignored, leading to unethical practices which may hurt the long-term interests of the company. In this paper, we present a model to help eliminate this problem. Our model uses expectancy theory, a process theory of motivation, to show that teaching employees to engage in moral reasoning, and creating a corporate culture in which ethical behavior is both encouraged and rewarded, can increase the likelihood that a company's employees will act ethically.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Arvey, R.: 1972, 'Task Performance as a Function of Perceived Effort-Performance and Performance-Reward Contingencies', Organizational Behavior and Human Performance 8, 423–433.
Badaracco, J. L. and A. P. Webb: 1995, 'Business Ethics: A View from the Trenches', California Management Review 37(2), 8–28.
Baier, A.: 1985, 'Doing Without Moral Theory?', in A. Baier (ed.), Postures of the Mind: Essays on Mind and Morals (University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis), pp. 228–245.
Bayles, M. (ed.): 1968, Contemporary Utilitarianism (Anchor Books, New York).
Berenbeim, R. E.: 1992, Corporate Ethics Practices (The Conference Board, Report No. 986, New York).
Blodgett, T. B.: 1968, 'Showdown on “Business Bluffing” (Special Report)', Harvard Business Review 46(3), 162–170.
Brayfield, A. H. and W. H. Crockett: 1955, 'Employee Attitudes and Employee Performance', Psychology Bulletin 52, 396–424.
Brothers, T. (ed.): 1991, Corporate Ethics: Developing New Standards of Accountability (The Conference Board, Report No. 980, New York).
Carr, A. Z.: 1968, 'Is Business Bluffing Ethical?', Harvard Business Review 46(1), 143–153.
Fromson, B.: 1990, 'Did Drexel Get What it Deserved?', Fortune (March 12), 81–88.
Georgopoulos, B. S., G. M. Mahoney and N. W. Jones: 1957, 'A Path-Goal Approach to Productivity', Journal of Applied Psychology 41, 345–353.
Harrell, A. M. and M. J. Stahl: 1984, 'Modeling Managers' Effort-Level Decisions for a Within-Persons Examination of Expectancy Theory in a Budget Setting', Decision Sciences 15, 52–73.
Herzberg, F., G. Mausner, R. O. Peterson and D. R. Capwell: 1957, Job Attitudes: Review of Research and Opinion (Psychological Service of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh).
Hope, J. W. and L. E. Pate: 1988, 'A Cognitive-Expectancy Analysis of Compliance Decisions', Human Relations 41, 739–751.
Jorgenson, D. O., M. D. Dunnette and R. D. Pritchard: 1973, 'Effects of the Manipulation of a Performance-Reward Contingency on Behavior in a Simulated Work Setting', Journal of Applied Psychology 57, 271–280.
Kant, I.: 1785, Grounding for the Metaphysics of Morals, tr. James Ellington (Hackett Publishing Co., Indianapolis, 1981).
Klein, H. J.: 1991, 'Further Evidence on the Relationship between Goal Setting and Expectancy Theories', Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 49, 230–257.
Lawler, E. E. and L. W. Porter: 1967, 'Antecedent Attitudes of Effective Managerial Performance', Organizational Behavior and Human Performance 2, 122–142.
Lawler, E. E.: 1970, 'Job Attitudes and Employee Motivation: Theory, Research, and Practice', Personnel Psychology 23, 223–237.
Lewin, K.: 1951, 'Behavior and Development as a Function of the Total Situation', in D. Cartwright (ed.), Field Theory in Social Sciences: Selected Theoretical Papers (Harper & Row, New York), pp. 238–303.
Maremont, M.: 1995, 'Blind Ambition', Business Week (October 23), 79–92.
Nadler, D. and E. E. Lawler: 1977, 'Motivation: A Diagnostic Approach', in J. R. Hackman, E. E. Lawler and L. W. Porter (eds.), Perspectives on Behavior in Organizations (McGraw-Hill, Inc., New York), pp. 26–36.
Nelson, K. A.: 1991, 'The Game: Integrating Corporate Standards Worldwide', in T. Brothers (ed.), Corporate Ethics: Developing New Standards of Accountability (The Conference Board, Report No. 980, New York), pp. 27–28.
Pritchard, R. D. and M. S. Sanders: 1973, 'The Influence of Valence, Instrumentality, and Expectancy on Effort and Performance', Journal of Applied Psychology 57, 55–60.
Schuh, A. J.: 1967, 'The Predictability of Employee Tenure: A Review of the Literature', Personnel Psychology 20, 133–152.
Snead, K. C. and A. M. Harrell: 1994, 'An Application of Expectancy Theory to Explain a Manager' Intention to Use a Decision Support System', Decision Sciences 25, 499–513.
Spagnola, S. S: 1992, 'Human Resources Programs for New and Old Employees', in T. Brothers (ed.), Corporate Ethics: Developing New Standards of Accountability (The Conference Board, Report No. 980, New York), pp. 19–20.
Stocker, M.: 1973, 'Act and Agent Evaluations', Review of Metaphysics 27, 42–61.
Stocker, M.: 1976, 'The Schizophrenia of Modern Ethical Theories', Journal of Philosophy 3, 453–466.
Vroom, V.: 1964, Work and Motivation (John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Fudge, R.S., Schlacter, J.L. Motivating Employees to Act Ethically: An Expectancy Theory Approach. Journal of Business Ethics 18, 295–304 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005801022353
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005801022353