Skip to main content
Log in

Labelled Resolution for Classical and Non-classical Logics

  • Published:
Studia Logica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Resolution is an effective deduction procedure for classical logic. There is no similar "resolution" system for non-classical logics (though there are various automated deduction systems). The paper presents resolution systems for intuistionistic predicate logic as well as for modal and temporal logics within the framework of labelled deductive systems. Whereas in classical predicate logic resolution is applied to literals, in our system resolution is applied to L(abelled) R(epresentation) S(tructures). Proofs are discovered by a refutation procedure defined on LRSs, that imposes a hierarchy on clause sets of such structures together with an inheritance discipline. This is a form of Theory Resolution. For intuitionistic logic these structures are called I(ntuitionistic) R(epresentation) S(tructures). Their hierarchical structure allows the restriction of unification of individual variables and/or constants without using Skolem functions. This structures must therefore be preserved when we consider other (non-modal) logics. Variations between different logics are captured by fine tuning of the inheritance properties of the hierarchy. For modal and temporal logics IRS's are extended to structures that represent worlds and/or times. This enables us to consider all kinds of combined logics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Fitting, 1983, ‘Proof Methods for Modal and Intuitionistic Logics’, Synthese Library 169

  2. Gabbay, D., U. Reyle, 1984, ‘N-Prolog: An Extension of Prolog with Hypothetical Implications I’ in: Journal of Logic Programming 1, 319–355

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Gabbay, D., U. Reyle, 1993, ‘Computation with Run-Time-Skolemization’, in: Journal of Applied Non-Classical Logic 3, 93–134

    Google Scholar 

  4. Gabbay, D., U. Reyle, 1989, ‘Direct Deductive Computation on Discourse Representation Structures’, in Linguistics and Philosophy 17, 345–390

    Google Scholar 

  5. Gabbay, D., 1990, Labelled Deductive Systems. Principles and Applications. Vol 1: Basic Principles, Oxford University Press, in press.

  6. Gabbay, D., 1996, ‘Fibred Semantics and the Weaving of Logics, Part 1: Modal and Intuitionistic logic’, To appear in Journal of Symbolic Logic.

  7. Gabbay, D., 1996, ‘An Overview of Fibred Semantics and The Combination of Logics’, To appear in Proceedings of Frontiers of Combining Systems FroCoS'96, K. Schulz and F. Baader, Editors.

  8. Kamp, H., U. Reyle, 1993, From Discourse to Logic, Vol I, Kluw

  9. Kripke, S., 1965, ‘Semantic Analysis for Intuitionistic Logic I’, in Crossley, J. A., Dummett, M. A. E. (eds.): Formal Systems and Recursive Functions, North Holland, 92–129.

  10. Simpson, A. K., 1994, The Proof Theory and Semantics of Intuitionistic Modal Logic, PhD Thesis, Department of Computer Science, University of Edinburgh.

  11. Russo, A., 1996, Modal Logics as Labelled Deductive Systems, PhD Thesis, Imperial College, London, 1996

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gabbay, D., Reyle, U. Labelled Resolution for Classical and Non-classical Logics. Studia Logica 59, 179–216 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004952317276

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004952317276

Keywords

Navigation