Abstract
The revival of Aristotelian virtue ethics since the 1980s does not signify that it goes back to its original form; rather, it is generally manifested in three different variations: The first is a variation of what is known as communitarianism, the second is universalism, and the third is phronesis. On the social level of morality, the serious attempt of modern virtue ethics towards improving the moral spirit of society is laudable. However, its method and reasoning deviates greatly from the demands of modern society’s integration of its operating rules and regulations, and concept of values; hence all of its attempts can hardly escape the fate of becoming just a fantasy. Yet, on the level of dealing with ethic conflicts and moral paradox, modern virtue ethics—via interpreting the theory of phronesis by Aristotle—proposes the valuable thought of a balanced morality that principlism should concern itself with and nourish itself from.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bayertz, K. (1994). “Praktische Philosophie als Angewandte Ethik.” In: Bayertz, K. Hg. Praktische Philosophie. Hamburg: Rowohlt
Grunert, F. (1999). “Klugheit.” In: Peter Prechtl und Franz Peter Burkhard Hg. Metzler Philosophie Lexikon. Stuttgart: Metzler
Hare, R. M. (1972). Die Sprache der Moral, Frankfurt a. M.: Suhrkamp. Vgl. Bayertz, K. “Praktische Philosophie als angewandte Ethik.” In: Bayertz, K. Hg. Praktische Philosophie. Hamburg: Rowohlt
Luckner, A. (2006). “Klugheitsethik.” In: Düwell, M., Hübenthal, C., and Werner, M. H. Hg. Handbuch Ethik. Stuttgart: Metzler
Kant, I. (1968). “Grundlegung zur Metaphysik der Sitten.” In: Kants Werk (Akademie Textausgabe), Bd. IV. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter
Pauer-Studer, H. (2003). Einführung in die Ethik. Wien: WUV
Rapp, C. (2006). “Aristoteles.” In: Marcus Düwell, Christoph Hübenthal, Micha H. Werner Hg. Handbuch Ethik. Stuttgart: Metzler
Schäuble, W. (1996). “Bürgertugenden und Gemeinsinn in der Liberalen Gesellschaft.” In: Teufel, E. Hg. Was hält die Moderne Gesellschaft Zusammen? Frankfurt a. M.: Suhrkamp
Waas, L. R. (1983). “MacIntyre und die Moralische Krise der Gegenwart—After Virtue ‘kommunitaristisch’ Betrachtet.” Zeitschrift für Politik, 49. Jg.2/2002. Vgl. Gert, B. (1983). Die Moralischen Regeln: Eine neue Rationale Begründung der Moral. Frankfurt a. M: Suhrkamp
Waas, L. R. (2002). “MacIntyre und die moralische Krise der Gegenwart—After Virtue ‘Kommunitaristisch’ Betrachtet.” Zeitschrift für Politik, 49. Jg. 2
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Translated by ZHANG Lin from Zhongguo Renmin Daxue Xuebao 中国人民大学学报 (Journal of Renmin University of China), 2009, (3): 80–88
About this article
Cite this article
Gan, S. The destiny of modern virtue ethics. Front. Philos. China 5, 432–448 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11466-010-0107-1
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11466-010-0107-1