Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Board of Directors and Ethics Codes in Different Corporate Governance Systems

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Business ethics is one of the most significant demands made by institutional and individual investors, who usually require the participation of the board of directors in the planning and implementation of ethical behaviour in corporations. This is done by drawing up an ethics code (EC) and then monitoring its fulfilment. This study has a dual objective: first, to analyse the role played by the composition of the board of directors, and by that we mean its independence and the diversity of its members, on the implementation and scope of an EC, and, second, to detect whether the corporate governance (CG) system moderates the level of involvement of the board in ethical issues. The findings obtained from a data panel sample made up of 760 listed companies from 12 countries for the years 2003–2009 show that the largest companies with large-sized and diverse boards implement the most developed ECs. Nevertheless, the extent of involvement of the independent directors is conditioned by the level of shareholder orientation characteristic of the system of CG in the corporation’s country of origin.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abowd, J. M., & Bognanno, M. (1995). International differences in executive and managerial compensation. In R. Freeman & L. Katz (Eds.), Differences and changes in wage structures (pp. 67–103). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anand, V., Ashforth, B. E., & Dashi, M. (2004). Business as usual: The acceptance and perpetuation of corruption in organizations. The Academy of Management Executive, 18, 39–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Archel, P. (2003). La divulgación de la información social y medioambiental en la gran empresa española en el período 1994–1998: Situación actual y perspectivas. Revista Española de Financiación y Contabilidad, 32, 571–601.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Archel, P., & Lizarraga, F. (2001). Algunos determinantes de la información medioambiental divulgada por las empresas españolas cotizadas. Revista de Contabilidad, 4, 129–153.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arora, P., & Dharwadkar, R. (2011). Corporate governance and corporate social responsibility (CSR): The moderating roles of attainment discrepancy and organization snack. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 19, 136–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beasley, M. S. (1996). An empirical analysis of the relation between the board of director composition and financial statement fraud. The Accounting Review, 71, 443–465.

    Google Scholar 

  • Betz, M., O’Connel, L., & Shepard, J. M. (1989). Gender differences in proclivity for unethical behaviour. Journal of Business Ethics, 8, 321–324.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bonn, I., & Fisher, J. (2005). Corporate Governance and Business Ethics: Insights from the strategic planning experience. Corporate Governance and Business Ethics, 13, 730–738.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chua, F., & Rahman, A. (2011). Institutional pressures and ethical reckoning by business corporations. Journal of Business Ethics, 98, 307–329.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Villiers, C., Naiker, V., & Van Staden, C. J. (2011). The effect of board characteristics on firm environmental performance. Journal of Management, 37, 1636–1663.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diwedi, N., & Jain, A. (2005). Corporate governance and performance of Indian firms: The effect of board size and ownership. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 17, 161–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fombrum, C. J., & Shanley, M. (1990). What’s in a name? Reputation building and corporate strategy. Academy of Management Journal, 33, 233–258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Franks, J. R., & Mayer, C. P. (1990). Capital markets and corporate control: A study of France, Germany and de UK. Economic Policy, 10, 191–230.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frías-Aceituno, J. V., Rodríguez-Ariza, L., & García-Sánchez, I. M. (2013a). The role of the board in the dissemination of integrated corporate social reporting. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 20, 219–233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frías-Aceituno, J. V., Rodríguez-Ariza, L., & García-Sánchez, I. M. (2013b). Is integrated reporting determined by a country’s legal system? An exploratory study. Journal of Cleaner Production, 44, 45–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gandía, J. L. & Pérez, T. A. (2005). E-gobierno corporativo y transparencia informativa en las sociedades cotizadas españolas: un estudio empírico. Monografía no. 8, Dirección de Estudios y Estadísticas. Madrid: Comisión Nacional del Mercado de Valores (Spanish Securities and Exchange Commission).

  • García-Sánchez, I. M., Cuadrado-Ballesteros, B., & Sepulveda, C. (2014). Does media pressures moderate CSR disclosures by external directors? Evidence from listed Spanish companies. Management Decision, 52(6), 1014–1045.

  • García-Sánchez, I. M., Rodríguez-Ariza, L., & Frías-Aceituno, J. V. (2013). The cultural system and integrated reporting. International Business Review, 22, 828–838.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • García-Sanchez, I. M., Rodríguez-Domínguez, L., & Gallego-Álvarez, I. (2011). Corporate governance and strategic information on the internet. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 24(4), 471–501.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • García-Sánchez, I. M., Rodríguez-Dominguez, L., & Gallego-Álvarez, I. (2008). The influence of the board of directors on implementing an ethics code. Revista de Contabilidad-Spanish Accounting Review, 11, 93–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garegnani, G. M., Merlotti, E. P., & Russo, A. (2013). Scoring firms’ codes of ethics: An exploratory study of quality drivers. Journal of Business Ethics,. doi:10.1007/s10551-013-1968-8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gelauff, G. M. M., & Den Broeder, C. (1996). Governance of stakeholder relationships. The German and Dutch experience. Research Memorandum 127. The Hague: Central Planning Bureau.

  • Gellerman, S. W. (2003). Why corporations can’t control chicanery. Business Horizons, May/June, 17–24.

  • Gray, R. H., Javad, M., Power, D., & Sinclair, C. D. (2001). Social and environmental disclosures and corporate characteristics: A research note and extension. Journal of Business, Finance and Accounting, 28, 327–356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hackston, D., & Milne, M. J. (1996). Some determinants of social and environmental disclosures in New Zealand companies. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 9, 77–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (1998). Multivariate data analysis. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrigan, K. R. (1981). Numbers and positions of women elected to corporate boards. Academy of Management Journal, 24, 619–625.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris, J. (1989). Ethical values and decision processes of male and female business students. Journal of Education for Business, 64, 234–238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heidrick, & Struggles. (2004). Assuring ethical and responsible leadership: How to meet the challenge. Lore International Institute, Chicago: Neisendorf and Associates, Inc.

  • Ibrahim, N. A., & Angelidis, J. P. (1994). Effect of board members’ gender on corporate social responsiveness orientation. Journal of Applied Business Research, 10, 35–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ibrahim, N. A., & Angelidis, J. P. (1995). The corporate social responsiveness orientation of board members: Are there differences between inside and outside directors? Journal of Business Ethics, 14, 405–410.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ibrahim, N., Angelidis, J., & Tomic, I. (2009). Managers’ attitudes toward codes of ethics: Are there gender differences? Journal of Business Ethics, 90, 343–353.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, R. A., & Greening, D. W. (1999). The effects of corporate governance and institutional ownership types on corporate social performance. Academy of Management Journal, 42, 564–576.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaptein, M. (2011). Toward effective codes: Testing the relationship with unethical behavior. Journal of Business Ethics, 99, 233–251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaptein, M., & Schwartz, M. S. (2008). The effectiveness of business codes: A critical examination of existing studies and the development of an integrated research model. Journal of Business Ethics, 77, 111–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. (1998). Law and finance. Journal of Political Economy, 106, 1113–1155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lamb, R. B. (1999). Ethics in financial services. Business and Society Review, 104, 13–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Larrán, M., & García-Meca, E. (2004). La relevancia de la información no-financiera en la estrategia empresarial de divulgación unitaria: percepciones empresa-analista sobre su utilidad. RVEH, 12, 127–145.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, J., Pike, R., & Haniffa, R. (2008). Intellectual capital disclosure and corporate governance structure in UK firms. Accounting and Business Research, 38, 137–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lipton, M., & Lorsch, J. W. (1992). A modest proposal for improved corporate governance. Business Lawyer, 48, 59–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lubatkin, M. H., Lane, P. J., Collin, S., & Very, P. (2007). An embeddedness framing of governance and opportunism: Towards a crossnationally accommodating theory of agency. Journal of Organizational Behaviour, 28, 43–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKinney, J. A., Emerson, T. L., & Neubert, M. (2010). The effects of ethical codes on ethical perceptions of actions toward stakeholders. Journal of Business Ethics, 97, 505–516.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moerland, P. W. (1995). Corporate ownership and control structures: An international comparison. Review of International Organization, 10, 443–446.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Neill, H. M., Saunders, C. B., & McCarthy, A. D. (1989). Board members, corporate social responsiveness and profitability: Are tradeoffs necessary? Journal of Business Ethics, 8, 353–357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peng, M. W. (2003). Institutional transitions and strategic choices. Academy of Management Review, 28, 275–296.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prado-Lorenzo, J. M., & García-Sánchez, I. M. (2010). The role of the board of directors in disseminating relevant information on greenhouse gases. Journal of Business Ethics, 97, 391–424.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reaz, M., & Hossain, M. (2007). Corporate governance around the world: An investigation. Journal of American Academy of Business, 11, 169–175.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robertson, C. J. (2008). An analysis of 10 years of business ethics research in Strategic Management Journal: 1996–2005. Journal of Business Ethics, 80, 745–753.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robertson, C., Blevins, D., & Duffy, T. (2013). A five-year review, update, and assessment of ethics and governance in Strategic Management Journal. Journal of Business Ethics, 117, 85–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodríguez Ariza, L., Frías-Aceituno, J. V. & García-Rubio, R. (2014). El consejo de administración y las memorias de sostenibilidad. Revista de Contabilidad-Spanish Accounting Review, 17(1), 5–16.

  • Rodríguez Domínguez, L., Gallego Álvarez, I., & García Sánchez, I. M. (2009). Corporate governance and code of ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 90, 187–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott, J. (1985). Corporations, classes and capitalism. London: Hutchinson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh, J. B. (2011). Determinants of the effectiveness of corporate codes of ethics: An empirical study. Journal of Business Ethics, 101, 385–395.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stevens, J. M., Steensma, K., Harrison, D. A., & Cochran, P. L. (2005). Symbolic or substantive document? The influence of ethics codes on financial executives’ decisions. Strategic Management Journal, 26, 181–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stultz, J. E. (1979). Madam director. Directors and Boards, 3, 6–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Urbany, J. E. (2005). Inspiration and cynicism in values statements. Journal of Business Ethics, 62, 169–182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vafeas, N. (1999). Board meeting frequency and firm performance—An empirical analysis. Journal of Financial Economics, 53, 113–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Valentine, S., & Fleischman, G. (2008). Ethics programs, perceived corporate social responsibility and job satisfaction. Journal of Business Ethics, 77, 159–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vethouse, B., & Kandogan, Y. (2007). Ethics in practice: What are managers really doing? Journal of Business Ethics, 70, 151–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weaver, G. R., Treviño, L. K., & Cochran, P. L. (1999). Corporate ethics practices in the mid-1990’s: An empirical study of the Fortune 1000. Journal of Business Ethics, 18, 283–294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weigelt, K., & Camerer, C. (1988). Reputation and corporate strategy: A review of recent theory and applications. Strategic Management Journal, 9, 443–454.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weimer, J., & Pape, J. C. (1999). A taxonomy of systems of corporate governance. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 7, 152–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wotruba, T. R., Chonko, L. B., & Loe, T. W. (2001). The impact of ethics code familiarity on manager behavior. Journal of Business Ethics, 33, 59–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Universidad de Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain

    Isabel-María García-Sánchez & Luis Rodríguez-Domínguez

  2. Universidad de Granada, Granada, Spain

    José-Valeriano Frías-Aceituno

Authors
  1. Isabel-María García-Sánchez
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Luis Rodríguez-Domínguez
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. José-Valeriano Frías-Aceituno
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Isabel-María García-Sánchez.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

García-Sánchez, IM., Rodríguez-Domínguez, L. & Frías-Aceituno, JV. Board of Directors and Ethics Codes in Different Corporate Governance Systems. J Bus Ethics 131, 681–698 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2300-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2300-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation